Aggravation of risk and failure to take precautionary measures are focal issues in non-life insurance in terms of potential partial or full release of the insurer from the duty to perform. Not infrequently, it is difficult to draw a line between the aggravation of risk on the one hand, and non-compliance with precautionary measures on the other, since a particular action by a policyholder may present both situations. At the same time, the legal remedies available to the insurer regarding these two situations are different in scope. The aggravation of risk and non-compliance with precautionary measures are precisely the bases on which insurers actually reduce indemnity or refuse to compensate for damages. This article explores the differences between insurance laws in the Baltic states—specifically, the Estonian Law of Obligations Act, the Latvian Insurance Contract Law and Lithuanian rules contained in the Civil Code and Insurance Law. The article explores the differences between the Baltic states’ insurance laws and the Principles of European Insurance Contract Law (PEICL) with regard to a policyholder’s duty in relation to aggravation of risk and precautionary measures, as the rights and obligations of policyholders do change where the optional instrument is applied. The article also includes comparisons to German, Finnish and Russian insurance law.
8. Brand, Oliver. “Contract Terms: Judicial Approaches to the Interpretation of Insurance Contracts”: 93–119. In: Julian Burling and Kevin Lazarus, eds. Research Handbook on International Insurance Law and Regulation. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., 2011.
9. Chirico, Filomena, and Pierre Larouche, eds. Economic Analysis of the DCFR: The Work of the Economic Impact Group Within CoPECL. Berlin, New York: Sellier, De Gruyter, 2010.
10. Chirico, Filomena, Eric Van Damme, and Pierre Larouche. “A Giant with Feet of Clay: A First Law and Economics Analysis of the Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR).” TILEC Discussion Paper No. 2010-025 (June 22, 2010): 1–17 // http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1628558.
11. Clarke, Malcolm. “Aggravation of Risk During the Insurance Period.” Lloyds Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly 1 (2003): 109–124.
12. Clarke, Malcolm. “Late Payment of Insurance Money.” Erasmus Law Review 5 (2) (2012): 115–121.
13. Cousy, Herman. “About Sanctions and the Hybrid Nature of Modern Insurance Contract Law.” Erasmus Law Review 5 (2) (2012): 123–131.
14. Cousy, Herman. “The Principles of European Insurance Contract Law: Duty of Disclosure and the Aggravation of Risk.” ERA Forum 9 (2008): 119–132.
15. Delfos-Roy, Yvonne. “The PEICL and the Duty of Disclosure.” European Review of Private Law 1 (2011): 71–86.
17. Fogel’son, Iurii. “Kommentarii k stat’iam glavy 48 Grazhdanskogo kodeksa RF ‘Strakhovanie’.” Fond Zashchity prav strakhovatelei // http://insurant.ru/law/48-com [in Russian].
18. Fontaine, Marcel. “An Academic View”: 29–44. In: Helmut Heiss and Mandeep Lakhan, eds. Principles of European Insurance Contract Law: A Model Optional Instrument. Munich: Sellier European Law Publishers GmbH, 2011.
19. Gavrilova, V. E. Strakhovanie. Moskva: Izdatelstvo Moskovskogo Universiteta, 2012 [in Russian].
20. Heiss, Helmut, Malcolm Clarke, and Mandeep Lakhnan. “Europe: Toward a Harmonised European Insurance Contract Law—The PEICL”: 603–621. In: Julian Burling and Kevin Lazarus, eds. Research Handbook on International Insurance Law and Regulation. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., 2011.
21. Heiss, Helmut. “Insurance Contract Law Between Business Law and Consumer Protection”: 335–353. In: Karen B. Brown and David V. Snyder, eds. General Reports of the XVIIIth Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law/Rapports Généraux du XVIIIème Congrès de l’Académie Internationale de Droit Comparé. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York: Springer, 2012.
22. Heiss, Helmut. “Proportionality in the New German Insurance Contract Act.” Erasmus Law Review 5 (2) (2012): 105–114.
23. Heiss, Helmut. “The Common Frame of Reference (CFR) of European Insurance Contract Law.” ERA Forum 9 (2008): 95–109.
24. Hinchliffe, Peter. “Review of Principles of European Insurance Law.” ERA Forum 9 (2008): 167–175.
25. Hoppu, Esko, and Mika Hemmo. Vakuutusoikeus. Helsinki: WSOYpro, 2006 [in Finnish].
26. Karapetov, A. “Pravo na otkaz ot vyplaty strakhovogo vozmeshcheniia s tochki zreniia printsipa svobody dogovora.” Zakon 1 (2010): 118–125 [in Russian].
27. Khudiakov, A. I. Teoriia strakhovaniia. Moscow: Statut, 2010 [in Russian].
28. Koch, Robert. “German Reform of Insurance Contract Law.” European Journal of Commercial Contract Law 2 (3) (2010): 163–171.
29. Kramer, Xandra. “The New European Conflict of Law Rules on Insurance Contracts in Rome I: A Complex Compromise.” The Icfai University Journal of Insurance Law VI (4) (2008): 23–42.
30. Lakhan, Mandeep, and Helmut Heiss. “An Optional Instrument for European Insurance Contract Law.” Utrecht Journal of International and European Law 27/71 (2010): 1–11.
31. Lehtipuro, Katriina, et al. Vakuutuslainsäädänto. Sastamala: Finanssi-ja Vakuutuskustannus OY, 2010 [in Finnish].
36. Pynt, Greg, and Kyriaki Noussia. “Report on, and Minutes of, the Consumer Protection and Dispute Resolution Working Party Session on Precautionary Measures.” Consumer Working Party Session, IV AIDA Europe Conference. London (September 13-14, 2012) // http://www.aida.org.uk/pdf/Consumer%20Protection%20London.pdf.
37. Rantala, Jukka, and Teivo Pentikäinen. Vakuutusoppi. Sastamala: Finanssi-ja Vakuutuskustannus OY, 2009 [in Finnish].
38. Rühl, Giesela. “Common Law, Civil Law, and the Single European Market for Insurance.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 55 (2006): 883–884.
5. Commission Decision of 17 January 2013 on Setting up the Commission Expert Group on a European Insurance Contract Law. Official Journal of the European Union, C 16/6 (January 19, 2013).
6. Commission Proposal for a Council Directive on the Coordination of Laws, Regulations and Administrative Provisions Relating to Insurance Contracts. Official Journal of the European Union, C 190/2 (July 6, 1979).
7. Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts. EU Official Journal, L 095 (April 21, 1993): 0029−0034.
SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.102 Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.276
researchers and scholars in the fields of law and politics, with an acute interest in the cross-pollinations of disciplines, comparative approaches to regional issues, and active dialogue on pressing contemporary issues of theoretical and practical import.