In this article we analyse professional police and community policing in view of professionalism, strategy and structures. We aim to find ways for synthesizing these models that are usually seen as incompatible. Unlike many earlier studies of police organizations or strategies, we view strategies in the organization at the corporate, functional and operational levels, and argue that by combining them with functional and divisional principles of structuring, it is possible to place professional strategy at the core of policing, while using the community policing strategy mainly as a component part of the strategy in the framework of divisional organization. This way it is possible to avoid the risk of alienating police from the community and to ensure the successful implementation of corporate strategy through providing professional police units that perform the narrow functions, with quick and adequate information from the community.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
1. Allen John. Lost Geographies of Power. Oxford: Blackwell 2003.
2. Bevir Mark. Democratic Governance. Princeton University Press 2010.
3. Bourdieu Pierre. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity 1991.
4. Boutellier Hans. “The Convergence of Social Policy and Criminal Justice.” European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research Vol. 9 (2001): 361-380.
5. Brown Stephen E. “Conceptualizing Police Professionalism.” American Journal of Criminal Justice Vol. 5 No. 2 (1980): 6-17.
6. Brunsson Nils and Johan P. Olsen. The Reforming Organization. New York: Routledge 1993.
7. Carter Lycia and Mark Wilson. “Measuring Professionalism of Police Officers.” Police Chief Vol. 73 No. 8 (2006).
8. Clarke Ronald Victor Gemuseus ed. Situational Crime Prevention. Monsey NY: Criminal Justice Press 1997.
9. Crawford Adam. “Networked Governance and Post-Regulatory State? Steering Rowing and Anchoring the Provision of Policing and Security.” Theoretical Criminology Vol. 10 No. 4 (2006): 449-479.
10. Daft Richard L. Organization Theory and Design. 10th ed. Mason: Cengage Learning 2010.
11. Darke Sacha. “The Enforcement Approach to Crime Prevention.” Critical Social Policy Vol. 31 No. 3 (2011): 410-430.
12. David Fred R. Strategic Management: Concepts and Cases. New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc. 2011.
13. Den Heyer Garth. “Shape or Adapt: The Future of Policing.” Salus Journal Vol. 1 No. 1 (2013): 41-54.
14. Dobrin Adam. “Professional and Community Policing: The Mayberry Model.” Journal of Criminal Justice and Popular Culture Vol. 13 No. 1 (2006): 19-28.
15. Dupont Danica and Frank Pearce. “Foucault contra Foucault: Regarding the ‘Governmentality papers’.” Theoretical Criminology Vol. 5 No. 2 (2001): 123-158.
16. Eck John E. and Edward R. Maguire. “Have Changes in Policing Reduced Violent Crime? An Assessment of the Evidence”: 207-265. In: Alfred Blumstein and Joel Wallman eds. The Crime Drop in America. New York: Cambridge University Press 2006.
17. Edwards Adam and Gordon Hughes. “Public Safety Regimes: Negotiated Orders and Political Analysis in Criminology.” Criminology and Criminal Justice Vol. 12 No. 4 (2012): 433-458.
18. Flynn Norman. Public Sector Management. Los Angeles: SAGE 2012.
19. Foucault Michel. Discipline and Punish. New York: Vintage Books 1995.
20. Foucault Michel. Security Territory Population: Lectures at the College de France 1977-1978. Macmillan 2009.
21. Foucault Michel. The History of Sexuality. Volume 1. London: Penguin 1998.
22. France Alan and Paul Wiles. “Dangerous Futures: Social Exclusion and Youth Work in Late Modernity.” Social Policy and Administration Vol. 31 No. 5 (1997): 59-78.
23. Freidson Eliot. Professionalism the Third Logic: On the Practice of Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 2001.
24. Gorisi Peter. “Community Crime Prevention and the ‘Partnership Approach’: A Safe Community for Everyone?” European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research Vol. 9 No. 4 (2001): 447-457.
25. Greene Jack R. “Community Policing in America: Changing the Nature Structure and Function of the Police.” Criminal Justice Vol. 3 (2000): 299-370.
26. Hall David J. and Maurice A. Saias. “Strategy Follows Structure!” Strategic Management Journal Vol. 1 No. 2 (1980): 149-163.
27. Hargreaves Andy. “Four Ages of Professionalism and Professional Learning.” Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice Vol. 6 No. 2 (2000): 151-182.
28. Herbert Steve. “The Geopolitics of the Police: Foucault Disciplinary Power and the Tactics of the Los Angeles Police Department.” Political Geography Vol. 15 No. 1 (1996): 47-57.
29. Hoftede Geert Gert Jan Hofstede and Michael Minkov. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind: Intercultural Cooperation and its Importance for Survival. New York: McGraw-Hill 2010.
30. Hood Christopher and Michael Jackson Administrative Argument. Aldershot: Dartmouth 1991.
31. Hotho Sabine. “Professional Identity – Product of Structure Product of Choice: Linking Changing Professional Identity and Changing Professions.” Journal of Organizational Change Management Vol. 21 No. 6 (2008): 721-742.
32. Hughes Gordon and Adam Edwards eds. Crime Control and Community: The New Politics of Public Safety. Willan Publishing 2002.
33. Hughes Gordon and Michael Rowe. “Neighbourhood Policing and Community Safety: Researching Instabilities of the Local Governance of Crime Disorder and Security in the Contemporary UK.” Criminology and Criminal Justice Vol. 7 No. 4 (2007): 317-346.
34. Hughes Gordon. Understanding Crime Prevention. McGraw-Hill International 1998.
36. Jauch Lawrence R. and Richard N. Osborn. “Toward an Integrated Theory of Strategy.” The Academy of Management Review (1981): 491-498.
37. Jiao Allan Y. “Factoring Policing Models.” Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management Vol. 20 No. 3 (1997): 454-472.
38. Johnson Gerry Kevan Scholes and Richard Whittington. Fundamentals of Strategy. London: Prentice Hall 2009.
39. Jones Trevor and Ronald van Steden. “Democratic Police Governance in Comparative Perspective: Reflections from England and Wales and the Netherlands.” Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management Vol. 36 No. 3 (2013): 561-576.
40. Jørgensen Torben Beck Hanne Foss Hansen Marianne Antonsen and Preben Melander. “Public Organisations Multiple Constituencies and Governance.” Public Administration Vol. 76 (1998): 499-518.
41. Kelling George L. and Mark Harrison Moore. “The Evolving Strategy of Policing.” US Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs National Institute of Justice (Washington DC 1988).
42. Kerlikowske Gil. “The End of Community Policing: Remembering the Lessons Learned.” FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin Vol. 73 No. 4 (2004): 6-9.
43. Leichtman Ellen C. “Complex Harmony: The Military and Professional Models of Policing.” Critical Criminology: An International Journal (2007): 53-73.
44. Leukfeldt Rutger Sander Veenstra and Wouter Stol. “High Volume Cyber Crime and the Organization of the Police: The Results of Two Empirical Studies in the Netherlands.” International Journal of Cyber Criminology Vol. 7 No. 1 (2013): 1-17.
45. Lipsky Michael. Street-Level Bureaucracy. Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation 2010.
46. Mann Michael. The Sources of Social Power: Volume 1. A History of Power from the Beginning to AD 1760. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1986.
47. Mastrofski Stephen D. “Community Policing; A Sceptical View”: 44-73. In: Anthony Allan Braga and David Weisburd eds. Police Innovation. Contrasting Perspectives. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge 2006.
48. Michaud Claude and Jean-Claude Thoenig. Making Strategy and Organization Compatible. New York: Palgrave Macmillan 2003.
50. Mintzberg Henry. Structure in Fives. Designing Effective Organisations. Prentice Hall 1993.
51. Moore Mark Harrison and Robert C. Trojanowicz. “Corporate Strategies for Policing.” US Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs National Institute of Justice John F. Kennedy School of Government Harvard University No. 6 (1988): 1-15.
52. Morgan Gareth. Images of Organization. SAGE 2007.
53. Morgan James. Safer Communities: The Local Delivery of Crime Prevention through the Partnership Approach. London: Home Office 1991.
54. Murdoch Jon. Post-Structuralist Geography: A Guide to Relational Space. SAGE 2006.
55. Pollitt Christopher and Geert Bouckaert. Public Management Reform A Comparative Analysis - New Public Management Governance and the Neo-Weberian State. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2004.
56. Ponsaers Paul. “Reading about ‘Community (Oriented) Policing’ and Police Models.” Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management (2001): 470-497.
57. Powell Walter W. and Paul J. DiMaggio eds. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1991.
58. PUMA. “Performance Management in Government: Performance Measurement and Results-oriented Management.” Occasional Paper No. 3 (OECD 1995).
59. Quinn Robert E. Sue R. Faerman Michael P. Thompson Michael R. McGrath and Lynda S. St. Clair. Becoming a Master Manager: A Competency Framework. New York: Wiley 2011.
60. Rainey Hal G. Understanding and Managing Public Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass 2009.
61. Scharpf Fritz W. “Games Real Actors Could Play: Positive and Negative Coordination in Embedded Negotiations.” Journal of Theoretical Politics Vol. 6 No. 1 (1994): 27-53.
62. Scheider Matthew C. Robert Chapman and Amy Schapiro. “Towards the Unification of Policing Innovations under Community Policing.” Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management (2009): 694-718.
63. Schneider Jeffrey A. In Pursuit of Police Professionalism: The Development and Assessment of a Conceptual Model of Professionalism in Law Enforcement. PhD Thesis. University of Pittsburgh 2009.
64. Scott W. Richard. “Reactions to Supervision in a Heteronomous Professional Organization.” Administrative Science Quarterly (1965): 65-81.
65. Scott W. Richard. Organizations: Rational Natural and Open Systems. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc. 1992.
66. Shearing Clifford and Monique Marks. “Being a New Police in the Liquid 21st Century.” Policing Vol. 5 No. 3 (2011): 210-218.
67. Sklansky David Alan. “The Persistent Pull of Police Professionalism.” New Perspectives in Policing (March 2011).
68. Skogan Wesley G. “The Promise of Community Policing.” 27-43. In: Weisburd David and Anthony A. Braga eds. Police Innovation: Contrasting Perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press 2006.
69. Skogan Wesley G. and Susan M. Hartnett. Community Policing. Chicago Style. New York: Oxford University Press 1997.
70. Sootla Georg and Kersten Kattai. Siseministeeriumi korrakaitse- ja migratsioonipoliitika asekantsleri haldusala juhtimise korralduse ja toimimise analüüs (An Analysis of the Management Organisation and Performance in the Administrative Field of the Ministry of the Interior’s Vice-Chancellor of the Policy of Law and Order and Migration). Tallinn 2012 [in Estonian].
71. Stone Christopher and Jeremy Travis. “Toward a New Professionalism in Policing.” New Perspectives in Policing (March 2011).
72. Triantafillou Peter. “Addressing Network Governance through the Concepts Of Governmentality and Normalization.” Administrative Theory & Praxis Vol. 26 No. 4 (2004): 489-508.
73. Virta Sirpa. “Governing Urban Security in Finland: Towards the ‘European Model’.” European Journal of Criminology Vol. 10 No. 3 (2013): 341-353.
74. Vollmer August. “Police Progress in the Past Twenty-Five Years.” Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1933): 161-175.
75. Voruz Veronique. “Politics in Foucault's Later Work: A Philosophy of Truth; or Reformism in Question.” Theoretical Criminology Vol. 15 No. 1 (2011): 47-65.
76. Willis James J. “Improving Police: What’s Craft Got to Do with It?” Ideas in American Policing (2013): 1-13.
77. Wilson James Q. Varieties of Police Behaviour. Harvard University Press 1978.
78. Wilson Orlando Winfield and Roy Clinton McLaren. Police Administration. New York: McGraw-Hill 1963.
SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.138 Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.281
researchers and scholars in the fields of law and politics, with an acute interest in the cross-pollinations of disciplines, comparative approaches to regional issues, and active dialogue on pressing contemporary issues of theoretical and practical import.