Sanctions for Attorney Misconduct in Relation to a Client Under Lithuanian and German Law
Legal ethics is important for the daily work of attorneys; yet, it hardly receives enough attention in the training of lawyers. This article seeks to show how legal ethics matters and which consequences seemingly small ethics violations can have for attorneys. One key aspect of the client-attorney relationship is the trust which is placed in the attorney by the client. Both Germany and Lithuania prohibit that attorneys represent both parties in a legal dispute, a prohibition which can be surprisingly far-reaching. In this article the authors, both of whom are practicing attorneys, look at the differences and similarities between the legal frameworks in Lithuania and Germany as well as the impact the globalization and Europeanization of legal ethics has had on the domestic laws in their respective jurisdictions. Particular attention is given to the sanctions which can be imposed on attorneys for misconduct in the form of representation which betrays the trust of a client and which is therefore specifically prohibited by the law. Among other issues, the distinction between professional sanctions and punishments under criminal law will be dealt with, as well as the conditions under which attorneys in either jurisdiction are barred from accepting a specific case to begin with.
Boldizar, Alexander, and Outi Korhonen. "Ethics, Morals and International Law." European Journal of International Law 10 (1999): 279-311.
Boon, Andrew, and John Flood. "Globalization of Professional Ethics? The Significance of Lawyers' International Codes of Conduct." Legal Ethics 2 (1999): 29-57.
Fischer, Thomas. Strafgesetzbuch und Nebengesetze (Criminal Code and Supplementary Laws). 58th ed. Munich: Verlag C. H. Beck, 2011.
Hartung, Wolfgang. "Berufs- und Berufsordnungsrecht (Professional and Professional Order Law)": 1603-1622. In: Hans-Ulrich Büchting and Benno Heussen, eds. Beck'sches Rechtsanwalts-Handbuch (Beck's Handbook for Attorneys). 9th ed. Munich: Verlag C. H. Beck, 2007.
Heine, Günter. "§ 356 Parteiverrat": 2985-2993. In: Adolf Schönke, Horst Schröder, Theodor Lenckner, Peter Cramer, Walter Streer, Albin Eser, Günter Heine, Walter Perron, Detlev Sternberg-Lieben, Jörg Eisele, Nikolaus Bosch, Bernd Hecker, Jörg Kinzig, and Ulrike Schittenhelm. Strafgesetzbuch (Criminal Code). 28th ed. Munich: Verlag C. H. Beck, 2010.
Kühl, Kristian. Strafgesetzbuch - Kommentar (Criminal Code - Commentary). 27th ed. Munich: Verlag C. H. Beck, 2011.
Bundesrechtsanwaltsordnung (Law on the Profession of Attorneys of the Federal Republic of Germany): 565 et seq. In: Bundesgesetzblatt (Federal Publication of Legislation). 1959. Volume I.
Case no. 1 Ss 12/94. Judgment of 27 May 1994. Oberlandesgericht (Court of Appeals) Zweibrücken, 1st Senate for Criminal Law: 35-36. In: Neue Zeitschrift für Strafrecht 14 (1995).
Case no. 1 StR 226/64. Judgment of 6 October 1964. Bundesgerichtshof (Supreme Court), 1st Senate for Criminal Law: 41-44. In: BGHSt (Collection of the Judgments and Decisions of the Supreme Court in Criminal Law Cases). Volume 20.
Case no. 2 Ws 585/84. Judgment of 14 August 1984. Oberlandesgericht (Court of Appeals) Koblenz, 2nd Senate for Criminal Law: 1177. In: Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 39 (1985).
Case no. 3 StR 13/91. Judgment of 13 February 1991. Bundesgerichtshof (Supreme Court), 3rd Senate for Criminal Law: 221-222. In: Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Steuerstrafrecht 10 (1991).
Case no. 34 O 169/98. Judgment of 9 December 1998. Landgericht (District Court) Düsseldorf, 4th Chamber for Business Law.
Case no. 4 StR 344/62. Judgment of 16 November 1962. Bundesgerichtshof (Supreme Court), 4th Senate for Criminal Law: 192-200. In: BGHSt (Collection of the Judgments and Decisions of the Supreme Court in Criminal Law Cases). Volume 18.
Case no. 4 StR 724/53. Judgment of 4 February 1954. Bundesgerichtshof (Supreme Court), 4th Senate for Criminal Law: 301-312. In: BGHSt (Collection of the Judgments and Decisions of the Supreme Court in Criminal Law Cases). Volume 5.
Case no. 5 StR 180/62. Judgment of 26 June 1962. Bundesgerichtshof (Supreme Court), 5th Senate for Criminal Law: 305-307. In: BGHSt (Collection of the Judgments and Decisions of the Supreme Court in Criminal Law Cases). Volume 17.
Case no. 7 O 16794/06. Judgment of 26 October 2006. Landgericht (District Court) München I, 7th Chamber for Private Law.
Case no: 5St RR 60/94. Judgment of 29 September 1994. Bayerisches Oberstes Landesgericht (former Highest Court of Criminal Law in Bavaria, now defunct), 5th Senate for Criminal Law.
Government Resolution No. 1067 "For Approval of Lawyers Professional Liability Insurance Rules". Official Gazette, 2004, no. 133-4796.
Law on State-Guaranteed Legal Aid of the Republic of Lithuania. Official Gazette, 2000, no. 30-827; 2005, no. 18-572.
Law on the Bar of the Republic of Lithuania. Official Gazette, 2004, no. 50-1632.
Lithuanian Code of Ethics for Advocates. Official Gazette, 2005, no. 130-4681.
Order by the Minister of Justice No. 1R-278 "For Publishing the Order of Examination of Bar Disciplinary Actions". Official Gazette, 2007, no. 79-3197.
Rechtsdienstleistungsgesetz (Law on the Provision of Legal Services): 2840 et seq. In: Bundesgesetzblatt (Federal Publication of Legislation). 2007. Volume I.
Strafgesetzbuch (German Criminal Code): 127 et seq; 3322 et seq. In: Reichsgesetzblatt (Imperial Publication of Legislation). 1871. Bundesgesetzblatt (Federal Publication of Legislation). 1998. Volume I.
Strafprozessordnung (Criminal Procedure Law): 1074 et seq. In: Bundesgesetzblatt (Federal Publication of Legislation). 1987. Volume I.
SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.102 Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.276
researchers and scholars in the fields of law and politics, with an acute interest in the cross-pollinations of disciplines, comparative approaches to regional issues, and active dialogue on pressing contemporary issues of theoretical and practical import.