The Politics of Separation and Participation: Autonomous Spaces in Kaunas, Lithuania

Tomas Marcinkevičius 1
  • 1 Vytautas Magnus University, Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy, Lithuania


For the past four years autonomous spaces that vary in nature but are run by virtually the same group of people have been operating in Kaunas, Lithuania. In the Lithuanian context, they are one of the most prominent recent attempts at continuous radical leftist political infrastructure. In the Central and Eastern European context, they are peculiar for not being connected to public housing struggles. This article draws an outline of their modes of operation and paradigmatic shifts by examining their history as well as theoretical and sociological material and using extensive interviews conducted with participants. Awareness of the complicated relation between meaningful separation and broader participation is suggested as a reflexive means of becoming hubs of political involvement.

Falls das inline PDF nicht korrekt dargestellt ist, können Sie das PDF hier herunterladen.

  • 1. Aidukaitė, Jolanta, Anna Lipnevič, Saulius Nefas, Alvita Narkevičiūtė, and Fausta Anulytė. Būsto politika ir visuomenės iniciatyvos mieste (Housing policies and social initiatives in the city). Vilnius: Lietuvos socialinių tyrimų centras, 2014.

  • 2. Cattaneo, Claudio. “Investigating neorurals and squatters’ lifestyles: personal and epistemological insights on participant observation and on the logic of ethnographic investigation.” Athenea digital 10 (2006): 16–40.

  • 3. Croteau, David. “Which Side Are You On? The Tension between Movement Scholarship and Activism”: 20–40. In: David Croteau, William Hoynes, and Carlotte Ryan, eds. Rhyming Hope and History. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2005.

  • 4. Dadusc, Deanna. “Power, Knowledge and Resistances in the Study of Social Movements.” Contention: The Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Protest 1(2) (2014): 47–60.

  • 5. Fernandez, Luis A. “Being there: thoughts on anarchism and participatory observation”: 93–102. In: Randall Amster, Abraham DeLeon, Luis A. Fernandez, Anthony J. Nocella, II, and Deric Shannon, eds. Contemporary Anarchist Studies. London and New York: Routledge, 2009.

  • 6. Gagyi, Ágnes. “The constitution of the ‘political’ in squatting.” Baltic Worlds IX:1–2 (2016): 80-88.

  • 7. Kalb, Don. “Mavericks: Harvey, Graeber, and the reunification of anarchism and Marxism in world anthropology.” Focaal—Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology 69 (2014): 113–134.

  • 8. Katsiaficas, Georgy. The Subversion of Politics. Oakland, Cal.: AK, 2007.

  • 9. “Kauno skvoteriai. ‘Žaliojo Namo’ gyvenimas ir mirtis” (Kaunas squatters. Life and death of ‘Žalias Namas’). Kauno Žinios (July 19, 2015) //

  • 10. Kostka, Joanna, and Katarzyna Czarnotta. “Modes of knowledge production in the study of radical urban movements.” Interface: a journal for and about social movements 9(1) (2017): 368–388.

  • 11. Martín Alcoff, Linda, and José Alcoff. “Autonomism in theory and practice.” Science and Society 79(2) (2015): 221–242.

  • 12. O’Banion, Paul. “Autonomous Antifa: From the Autonomen to Post-Antifa in Germany.” It’s Going Down! (November 20, 2017) //

  • 13. Polanska, Dominika V. “Marginalizing discourses and activists’ strategies in collective identity formation: The case of Polish tenants’ movement”: 176–199. In: Kerstin Jacobsson and Elżbieta Korolczuk, eds. Civil Society Revisited: Lessons from Poland. New York: Berghahn Books, 2017.

  • 14. Robinson, Andrew. “Autonomism: The future of activism?” Ceasefire (October 8, 2010) //

  • 15. Ryan, Micheal. “Introduction II”: xxviii–xxx. In: Antonio Negri. Marx Beyond Marx: Lessons on the Grundrisse. London: Pluto Press, 1991.

  • 16. Valenzuela-Fuentes, Katia, Dominika V. Polanska, and Anne Kaun. “The right to housing in theory and in practice: going beyond the West.” Interface: a journal for and about social movements 9(1) (2017): 359–367.


Zeitschrift + Hefte