The Necessity of Satire in Media Literacy: Stephen Colbert’s Use of Sophistic and Socratic Irony

Open access

Abstract

Media literacy campaigns champion systematic thinking and high elaboration in the fight against fake news. However, they often overlook an ancient tool for discrediting demagogues and destroying disinformation: satire. This essay explores how satirist Stephen Colbert used irony in his 2010 congressional testimony, arguing that Colbert’s shift from Socratic to Sophistic irony encouraged listeners to think for themselves through a more central information-processing route. The essay concludes that irony increases recognition of fake news, but warns that an overreliance on Sophistic irony undermines an appreciation of truth, and requires the reintroduction of Socratic irony as a counter balance.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Aristotle. On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse. Translated by George A. Kennedy. New York: Oxford University Press 2007.

  • 2. Baym Geoffrey. “Representation and the Politics of Play: Stephen Colbert’s Better Know a District.” Political Communication Vol. 24 (2007): 359–376 // https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600701641441.

  • 3. Bennett W. Lance. “Relief in Hard Times: A Defense of Jon Stewart’s Comedy in an Age of Cynicism.” Critical Studies in Media Communication Vol. 24 No. 3 (2007): 278–283 // DOI: 10.1080/07393180701521072.

  • 4. Borden Sandra L. and Chad Tew. “The Role of Journalist and the Performance of Journalism: Ethical Lessons from ‘Fake’ News (Seriously).” Journal of Mass Media Ethics Vol. 22 No. 4 (2007): 300–314.

  • 5. Chaddock Gail Russell. “Bush Tax Cuts: Democrats Punt Until After Midterm Elections.” Christian Science Monitor (Sep. 24 2010).

  • 6. Colbert ReportThe. “Exclusive Better Know a District District of Columbia Eleanor Holmes Norton.” Comedy Central. July 27 2006.

  • 7. Consigny Scott. Gorgias: Sophist and Artist. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press 2001.

  • 8. Gorgias. “Encomium of Helen”: 251-256. In: Aristotle. On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse. Translated by George A. Kennedy. New York: Oxford University Press 2007.

  • 9. IFLA. “How to Spot Fake News” (July 2018) // https://www.ifla.org/publications/node/11174.

  • 10. Krauthammer Charles. “Voters Will Not be Amused by Congress’ Antics.” Houston Chronicle (Oct. 10 2010).

  • 11. O’Keefe Daniel J. “Elaboration Likelihood Model”: 1475–1480. In: Wolfgang Donsbach ed. The International Encyclopedia of Communication: Vol. IV Digital Imagery – Fictional Media Content. Malden MA: Blackwell 2008.

  • 12. Plato. “Socrates’ Defense (Apology).” Translated by Hugh Tredennick: 3–26. In: Edith Hamilton and Huntington Cairns eds. The Collected Dialogues of Plato. Princeton New Jersey: Princeton University Press 2005.

  • 13. Rainey James. “On the Media: Stephen Colbert Heads to Washington and Congress and Media Play the Jokester.” Los Angeles Times (Sep. 25 2010).

  • 14. Thill Scott. “Stephen Colbert’s Testimony Will Further Blur Political Reality.” Underwire. Wired.com (Sep. 24 2010).

  • 15. U.S. Congress. Committee on the Judiciary. House of Representatives. Subcommittee on Immigration Citizenship Refugees Border Security and International Law. Protecting America’s Harvest. 111th Cong. 2d Sess. (2010). Serial No. 111-150.

  • 16. Waisanen Don J. “A Citizen’s Guides to Democracy Inaction: Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert’s Comic Rhetorical Criticism.” Southern Communication Journal Vol. 74 No. 2 (2009): 119–140 // https://doi.org/10.1080/10417940802428212.

  • 17. Young Dannagal G. and Russell M. Tisinger. “Dispelling Late-Night Myths: News Consumption among Late-Night Comedy Viewers and the Predictors of Exposure to Various Late-Night Shows.” Press/Politics Vol. 11 No. 3 (2006): 113–134 // https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X05286042.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.42

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.138
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.281

Target audience: researchers and scholars in the fields of law and politics, with an acute interest in the cross-pollinations of disciplines, comparative approaches to regional issues, and active dialogue on pressing contemporary issues of theoretical and practical import.
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 516 433 20
PDF Downloads 411 343 30