The Role of Judicial Ethics in Court Administration: From Setting the Objectives to Practical Implementation

Open access

Abstract

A court administration striving to guarantee the independence and professionalism of the court and judges requires attention to judicial ethics. Judicial ethics as a system of professional values and as an institutional instrument of judiciary is an integral part of court administration which is based on the principle of self-regulation. The importance of court administration requires a scientific approach to its elements. Therefore, this article begins by providing analysis of the main objectives of judicial ethics and a comparative study on the European practices establishing judicial ethics. It also provides a systematic list of the basic principles of the conduct of judges that are established in different international standards and legal systems of different European countries. By analysing documents of different international institutions and codes of ethics of European countries, the author identifies a systematic structure and the fundamental starting point of modern judicial ethics. The methods of descriptive comparative analysis and observation of recent developments are dominant in this study. Reacting to the scientific problems and current needs of legal communities with regard to the enforcement of judicial ethics, the article presents approaches that could lead to increased effectiveness of ethics in the judiciary, as well as to the development of methods of enforcement of judicial ethics. The purpose of this article is not just to disclose the main international standards and regulations on judicial ethics in Europe, but also to make it practically valuable for developers of judicial ethics, taking into consideration the fact that recently many countries have been trying to reform and improve ethical systems in the judiciary. Given the limited scope of this article, other important elements of court administration and developing a comparative study of the content of judicial ethics and the jurisprudence of its implementation will be presented in future publications.

1. Cárdenas, Emilio J., and Héctor M. Chayer. “Corruption, accountability and the discipline of judges in Latin America.” Global Corruption Report (2007): 44–48 // http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un-dpadm/unpan045153.pdf.

2. Maitrepierre, Eric J. “Ethics, Deontology, Discipline of Judges and Prosecutors in France” // http://www.unafei.or.jp/english/pdf/RS_No80/No80_29VE_Maitrepierre.pdf.

3. Mayne, Greg. “Judicial integrity: the accountability gap and the Bangalore Principles.” Global Corruption Report (2007): 40–44 // http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un-dpadm/unpan045153.pdf.

4. Schultz, Jessica. “The UNCAC and judicial corruption: Requirements and avenues for reform.” Anti-Corruption Resource Centre (2009) // http://www.u4.no/publications/the-uncac-and-judicial-corruption-requirements-and-avenues-for-reform/.

5. Terhechte, Jörg Philipp. “Judicial Ethics for a Global Judiciary – How Judicial Networks create their own codes of conduct.” German Law Journal 10 (2009): 501–514 // http://www.leuphana.de/fileadmin/user_upload/PERSONALPAGES/_st/terhechte_joerg-philipp/files/Judicial_Ethics_for_a_Global_Judiciary_-_How_Judicial_Networks_Create_their_own_-_PDF_Vol_10_No_04_501-514_SI_Articles_Terhechte.pdf.

6. The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press 1995, 1999.

1. Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct (2002) // http://www.unodc.org/pdf/crime/corruption/judicial_group/Bangalore_principles.pdf.

2. Bologna and Milan Global Code of Judicial Ethics (2015) // http://www.jiwp.org/#!global-code-of-judicial-ethics/c1dnr.

3. Code of Ethics for Members of the Judiciary in Malta. The Commission for the administration of Justice (2004) // www.judiciarymalta.gov.mt/code-of-ethics.

4. Code of Ethics of Judges of the Republic of Lithuania. The General meeting of the Lithuanian judges (2006) // http://www.judicial-ethics.umontreal.ca/en/codes%20enonces%20deonto/documents/Code_lituanie.pdf.

5. Code of Judicial Ethics of International Criminal Court. ICC-BD/02-01-05 // https://www.icc-cpi.int/NR/rdonlyres/A62EBC0F-D534-438F-A128-D3AC4CFDD644/140141/ICCBD020105_En.pdf.

6. Code of Judicial Ethics of the Republic of Croatia. The Council of presidents of all councils of Judges of the Republic of Croatia (2006) // http://pak.hr/cke/propisi,%20zakoni/en/CodeofJudicalEthics/EN.pdf.

8. Commentary on the Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct (September 2007) // https://www.unodc.org/documents/corruption/publications_unodc_commentary-e.pdf.

9. Delcourt v. Belgium. European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), January 17, 1970 // http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"appno":["2689/65"],"itemid":["001-57467"]}.

10. Deontological Code for Judges and Prosecutors. Superior Council of Magistracy of Romania (2005) // www.csm1909.ro/csm/linkuri/15_11_2005__2048_en.doc.

11. Estonian Judges’ Code of Ethics. The Court en banc (2004) // http://www.nc.ee/?id=682.

12. Ethical Principles for Judges. The Association of Danish Judges (2014) // http://dommerforeningen.dk/english/ethical-principles-for-judges/.

13. Ethical Principles for Norwegian Judges. The Norwegian Association of Judges (2010) // http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/cooperation/CCJE/cooperation/Ethical%20_principles_Norwegian_judges.pdf.

14. Good Judicial Practice. Principles and Issues. Swedish association of judges and Courts of Sweden (2013) // http://www.domstol.se/Publikationer/Rapporter/god_domarsed-grundsatser_och_fragor_eng.pdf.

15. Guide for Magistrates, Principles, Values and Qualities. Published in 2012 by the Belgian High Council of Justice // http://www.csj.be/sites/default/files/press_publications/o0023f.pdf.

16. Guide to Judicial Conduct. The Judges’ Council of England and Wales (2013) // https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/JCO/Documents/Guidance/judicial_conduct_2013.pdf.

17. Judges Ethics Code. Adopted in 2012 by Association of Georgian Judges // http://www.supremecourt.ge/eng/judges-self-governance/judges-ethics-code/.

18. Judicial Ethics Report 2009-2010. ENCJ Working Group // http://www.encj.eu/images/stories/pdf/ethics/judicialethicsdeontologiefinal.pdf.

19. NVvR Guide to Judicial Conduct of the Dutch Judges Association: 87–125. In: Matters of Principle. Codes on the Independence and Impartiality of the Judiciary. The Dutch Foundation ‘Judges for Judges’ // https://www.rechtspraak.nl/SiteCollectionDocuments/Matters-of-principle.pdf.

20. Opinion no. 3 of the Consultative Council of European Judges (CCJE) to the attention of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on the principles and rules governing judges’ professional conduct, in particular ethics, incompatible behaviour and impartiality. Strasbourg (November 19, 2002) // https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?p=&id=1046405&Site=COE&direct=true.

21. Organic Law of Georgia on Common Courts // https://matsne.gov.ge/en/document/download/90676/13/en/pdf.

22. Resolution on Judicial ethics adopted by the European Court of Human Rights (Plenary Court) (June 23, 2008) // http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Resolution_Judicial_Ethics_ENG.pdf.

23. The Code of Conduct for Judicial Personnel: 81–85. In: Matters of Principle. Codes on the Independence and Impartiality of the Judiciary. The Dutch Foundation ‘Judges for Judges’ // https://www.rechtspraak.nl/SiteCollectionDocuments/Matters-of-principle.pdf.

24. The Code of Judicial Ethics in Italy. Adopted in 1994 by the National Association of Judges // http://www.judicial-ethics.umontreal.ca/en/codes%20enonces%20deonto/documents/CODE_ITALIEN.pdf.

25. The Code of Judicial Ethics of Slovenia. The Association of Judges of the Republic of Slovenia (2001) // http://www.judicial-ethics.umontreal.ca/en/codes%20enonces%20deonto/documents/SLOVENIA-CODEOFJUDICIALETHICS.pdf.

26. The Ethical Code of Judicial Conduct. The Judicial Council of the Slovak Republic (2010) // http://www.sudcovia.sk/sk/dokumenty/legislativa/39-english-categories/documents/archive/401-theet-codeofju-cond.

27. The Statement of Principles of Judicial ethics for the Scottish Judiciary (2010) // http://www.scotland-judiciary.org.uk/Upload/Documents/StatementofPriciplesofJudicialEthicsfortheScottishJudiciary.pdf.

Baltic Journal of Law & Politics

A Journal of Vytautas Magnus University

Journal Information


CiteScore 2018: 0.42

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.138
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.281

Target Group researchers and scholars in the fields of law and politics, with an acute interest in the cross-pollinations of disciplines, comparative approaches to regional issues, and active dialogue on pressing contemporary issues of theoretical and practical import.

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 762 623 66
PDF Downloads 361 325 39