In Belarus the state systematically hinders the development of civil society. NGOs have difficulties registering, functioning and sustaining their organisations. Some individuals related to the civil sector are persecuted, fined, imprisoned. Therefore a number of NGOs are registered abroad and civil society activists move with them to continue their work on Belarusian issues. In this article we aim to define people who left Belarus in order to work for Belarus as Belarusian Political Nomads, using the notion of transnational subjectivity to explore their migration strategies.
The article is based on 15 semi-structured interviews held in London (UK) and Vilnius (LT). Interviews were analysed using the concepts of transnational subjectivities and political nomadism, and combining elements from a critical events narrative analysis approach.
People who left Belarus to work for Belarus are Belarusian Political Nomads, because they create new democratic development visions for Belarus. Their individual political motivation can stem from the critical events that were registered in this research as turning points. Informants, individual conditions, histories and life experiences influence the outcomes of these events in terms of interpretation and induced motivation to engage in civil society activities.
Belarusian Political Nomads form their migration strategies on the basis of their transnational subjectivities, which can be characterised by temporal and symbolic relations to the receiving country, and long-term intensive dissociative relations to the sending countries’ political regime, as well as a strong relationship to the new visions of Belarus.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
1. Amnesty International. “Belarus: What Is Not Permitted Is Prohibited: Silencing Civil Society in Belarus” (May 15 2013): 1–5 // https://www.amnesty.org/download/Documents/12000/eur490062013en.pdf.
2. Appadurai Arjun. Modernity at Large. Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Vol. 1. Public Worlds. Minneapolis-London: University of Minnesota Press 1996.
3. Chulitskaya Tatsiana. “Belarusian NGOs and the West: A Way Forward.” Bell BelarusInfo Letter (2013).
4. Civil Society. Dialogue for Progress. Belarus Civil Society Organisations in Cross-Sectoral Dialogue: Experts Survey. Minsk: Civil Society Dialogue for Progress 2014 // http://www.csdialogue.eu/news/belarus-civil-society-organisations-cross-sectoral-dialogue-experts-survey.
5. Dahinden Janine. “Are We All Transnationals Now? Network Transnationalism and Transnational Subjectivity: The Differing Impacts of Globalization on the Inhabitants of a Small Swiss City.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 32 No. 8 (2009): 1365–1386 // doi:10.1080/01419870802506534.
6. Deleuze Gilles and Félix Guattari. Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Penguin Group (USA) Incorporated 2009.
7. Deleuze Gilles and Félix Guattari. A Thousand Plateus. Capitalism and Schizophrenia. London: University of Minnesota Press 2005.
8. Florini Ann and P. J. Simmons. “What the World Needs Now?”: 1-15. In: Ann Florini ed. The Third Force: The Rise of Transnational Civil Society. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace 2000.
9. Georgiou Myria. “Between Strategic Nostalgia and Banal Nomadism: Explorations of Transnational Subjectivity among Arab Audiences.” International Journal of Cultural Studies 16 No. 1 (2012): 23–39 // doi:10.1177/1367877912441429.
10. Hill Ronald J. “Post-Soviet Belarus: In Search of Direction”: 1–16. In: Stephen White Elena Korosteleva and John Löwenhardt eds. Postcommunist Belarus. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers 2005.
11. Hoad Terry “Definition of Political”: 360 In: The Concise Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology. Paw Prints 2008.
12. Holland Eugene W. Nomad Citizenship: Free-Market Communism and the Slow-Motion General Strike. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press 2011.
13. Human Rights Watch. “World Report 2015: Belarus” (January 29 2015) // https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2015/country-chapters/belarus.
14. ICNL. “Belarus - NGO Law Monitor - Research Center – ICNL” (2015) // http://www.icnl.org/research/monitor/belarus.html.
15. Kaldor Mary. “The Idea of Global Civil Society.” International Affairs 79 No. 3 (2014): 583–593.
16. Keck Margaret E. and Kathryn Sikkink. “Transnational Advocacy Networks in International and Regional Politics.” International Social Science Journal 51 No. 159 (1999): 89–101 // doi:10.1111/1468-2451.00179.
17. Kennedy Paul and Victor Roudometof. “Transnationalism in a Global Age”: 1–23. In: Paul Kennedy and Victor Roudometof eds. Communities Across Borders: New Immigrants and Transnational Culture. Taylor & Francis 2007.
18. Korosteleva Elena. “The Emergence of a Party System”: 35–58. In: Stephen White Elena Korosteleva and John Löwenhardt eds. Postcommunist Belarus. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers 2005.
19. Kvale Steinar. InterViews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. 1st ed. Thousand Oaks Calif: SAGE Publications Inc. 1996.
20. Law John. After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. Routledge 2004.
21. Lincoln Yvonna S. and Norman K. Denzin. Turning Points in Qualitative Research: Tying Knots in a Handkerchief. Rowman Altamira 2003.
22. Lyotard Jean François. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. University of Minnesota Press 1986.
23. Matchanka Anastasiya. “Substitution of Civil Society in Belarus: Government-Organised Non-Governmental Organisations.” Journal of Belarusian Studies 7 No. 2 (2014): 67–94.
24. Mendelson Sarah E. and John K. Glenn. “Introduction: Transnational Networks and NGOs in Postcommunist Societies”: 1–28. In: Sarah E. Mendelson and John K. Glenn eds. The Power and Limits of NGOs. Columbia University Press 2002.
27. Ouyang Jessica and Kathleen McKeown. “Modelling Reportable Events as Turning Points in Narrative”: 2149–2158. In: 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Lisbon Portugal: 2015 Association for Computational Linguistics 2015.
28. Padbiarozkin Maxim. “The Development of NGOs in Belarus.” The BEARR Trust Newsletter No. 58 (2012): 13–14 // http://www.bearr.org/pdfs/bearrnews_no58_WEB.pdf.
29. Papastergiadis Nikos. The Turbulence of Migration: Globalization Deterritorialization and Hybridity. Wiley 2013.
30. Porta Donatella Della and Sidney G. Tarrow. Transnational Protest and Global Activism. Rowman & Littlefield 2005.
31. Purcell Mark. “Rancière and Revolution.” Space and Polity 18 No. 2 (2014): 168–181 // doi:10.1080/13562576.2014.911591.
32. Rancière Jacques. Dis-Agreement. Politics and Philosophy. Minneapolis-London: University of Minnesota Press 1999.
33. Rancière Jacques. Dissensus. On Politics and Aesthetics. Edited by Steven Corcoran. London and New York: Continuum 2010.
34. Rancière Jacques. On the Shores of Politics. Verso 1995.
35. Rancière Jacques David Panagia and Rachel Bowlby. “Ten Theses on Politics.” Theory & Event 5 No. 3 (2001) // doi:10.1353/tae.2001.0028.
36. Rasolka Ihar. “Politisation of Civil Society in an Apolitical Society: Paternalism Deconsolidation and Action Strategies of Social Agents”: 61–66. In: Civil Society in Belarus 2000–2015. Collection of Texts. Warsaw: East European Democratic Centre 2015 // http://issuu.com/eedc_warsaw/docs/final_civil_society_in_belarus_inte_5d21802f640249/3?e=5048453/14443508.
37. Sassen Saskia. “Spatialities and Temporalities of the Global: Elements for a Theorization.” Public Culture 12 No. 1 (2000): 215–232 // doi:10.1215/08992363-12-1-215.
38. Silitski Vitali. “Contagion Deterred: Preemtive Authoritarianism in the Former Soviet Union (the Case of Belarus)”: 275-299. In: Valerie Bunce Michael McFaul and Kathryn Stoner-Weiss eds. Democracy and Authoritarianism in the Postcommunist World. 1st ed. Cambridge University Press 2009.
39. Smith Graham Vivien Law Andrew Wilson Annette Bohr and Edward Allworth. Nation-Building in the Post-Soviet Borderlands: The Politics of National Identities. Cambridge (England) New York: Cambridge University Press 1998.
40. Tonkacheva Elena. “Non-Profit Organisations in the Republic of Belarus. Legislative Regulation and Issues of Law Application”: 90-99. In: Belarus – the third sector. Minsk-Warsaw: Wschodnioeuropejskie Centrum Demokratyczne 2002 // http://bzh.kamunikat.org/download.php?item=1972-16.pdf&pubref=1972.
41. United Nations. Environmental Performance Reviews: Belarus ECE/CEP/129. United Nations Publications 2005.
42. Venice Commission Council of Europe. “Opinion on the Compatibility with Universal Human Rights Standards of Article 193-1 of the Criminal Code on the Rights of Non-Registered Associations of the Republic of Belarus Adopted by the Venice Commission at Its 88th Plenary Session (Venice 14-15 October 2011)” (2011) // http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/?pdf=CDL-AD(2011)036-e.
43. Webster Leonard and Patricie Mertova. Using Narrative Inquiry as a Research Method: An Introduction to Using Critical Event Narrative Analysis in Research on Learning Teaching. 1st ed. London New York: Routledge 2007.
44. White Stephen and Ian McAllister. “Patterns of Political Culture”: 17–34. In: Stephen White Elena Korosteleva and John Lowenhardt eds. Postcommnist Belarus. United States of America: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers 2005.
SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.138 Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.281
researchers and scholars in the fields of law and politics, with an acute interest in the cross-pollinations of disciplines, comparative approaches to regional issues, and active dialogue on pressing contemporary issues of theoretical and practical import.