This study analyses China’s One Belt, One Road (OBOR) initiative for the Baltic and South Caucasus countries. Trade, Foreign Direct Investments and transit potential are taken as main factors for the cooperation. A clash of China and the West in pursuing economic leadership is taken into account. The study suggests a new, alternative route for the OBOR initiative through the Caucasus, which has all the needed infrastructure and readiness for being started. Moreover, Georgia is not new to the EU preferences, it has experience of GSP+ and now the unique achievement of free trade regimes with the EU and China is also taken as an alternative route and an advantage for the Caucasus and the Baltic States.
Charaia, V. (2016), ‘Economics of conflict: Core economic dimensions of the Georgian-South Ossetian context,’ International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, vol. 3, no. 10.
Charaia, V. (2017a), ‘The role of multinational enterprises’ investments in emerging country’s economic development: Case of Georgia,’ World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 721–724. Retrieved from http://www.waset.org/publications/10006953 [accessed Nov 2018]
Chochia, A. & Popjanevski, J. (2016), ‘Change of power and its influence on country’s Europeanization process. Case study: Georgia,’ in T. Kerikmäe & A. Chochia (eds.) Political and Legal Perspectives of the EU Eastern Partnership Policy, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 197−210. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27383-9_13
Dobrin, S. & Chochia, A. (2016), ‘The concepts of trademark exhaustion and parallel imports: A comparative analysis between the EU and the USA,’ Baltic Journal of European Studies, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 28−57. https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2016-0011
Éltető, A. & Antalóczy, K. (2017), ‘Export promotion aims and reality: A comparison of the Iberian, Baltic and Central European region,’ Baltic Journal of European Studies, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2017-0004
Ferraro, S.; Dutt, K. P. & Kerikmäe, T. (2017), ‘Using patent development, education policy and research and development expenditure policy to increase technological competitiveness of small European Union Member States,’ Croatian International Relations Review, vol. 23, no. 78, pp. 97−126. https://doi.org/10.1515/cirr-2017-0009
Lashkhi, M. & Charaia, V. (2017), ‘Investment development path and motivations for Foreign Direct Investment in Georgia,’ World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Economics and Management Engineering, vol. 11, no. 11, p. 3213.
Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications (2014), Made in Estonia 3.0.: The Estonian foreign investments and export action plan for the years 2014–2017 for increasing the export capacity of Estonian companies and involving foreign investments, p. 8. Retrieved from https://www.mkm.ee/sites/default/files/mie_3.0_english_version.pdf [accessed Nov 2018]
Papava, V. & Charaia, V. (2017b), ‘The role of inflation and its targeting for low-income countries (Lessons from post-Communist Georgia),’ European Journal of Economic Studies, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 96–103. Retrieved from http://ejournal2.com/journals_n/1504096069.pdf [accessed Nov 2018]
Šteinbuka, I.; Muravska, T. & Kuznieks, A. (2017), ‘Cooperation formats of China and Europe: Synergies and divergences,’ Baltic Journal of European Studies, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 98–118. https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2017-0007
Zhang, L.; Grešš, M. & Brocková, K. (2017), ‘Current and potential Chinese Foreign Direct Investment in the Slovak Republic,’ Baltic Journal of European Studies, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2017-0006