The European Union: Stability Despite Challenges

Open access

Abstract

The European Union has remained stable despite all its past and current challenges. This essay explores the reasons for that. We argue that the secret behind its stability lies in its system of negotiation. Against this backdrop, we analyse two recent challenges of the European Union. First, we show how domestically bound European governments were able to bring about a stable internationally negotiated solution for what became known as euro crisis. By means of game theory we boil down why the European Union remained stable even after havoc struck. Second, we analyze the dynamics behind the failed negotiations with Ukraine that have led to the current conflict. Thereby, the role of vested interest in negotiations for stability is emphasized. We prognosticate that due to the very same vested interests that led to the failure of the negotiations, Ukraine will remain united and return to stability in the mid-term. Finally, we conclude that, despite challenges like these, the European Union never experienced a crisis in terms of system theory since it never fell short to fulfil its purpose which is to allow for peaceful cooperative solutions.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Åslund A. (2010) ‘Crimea and Punishment’ Foreign Policy 4 January 2010. Retrieved from http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2010/01/04/crimea_and_punishment [accessed Sep 2014]

  • Bolle M. & Draeger J. (2013) Eurocrises: Economic and Political Efficiency. EPSA 2013 Annual General Conference Paper 429. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2224866 [accessed Sep 2014]

  • Bolle M. & Kanthak L. (2013) ‘The Eurozone Crisis: An Opportunity or a Setback for Europe?’ in E. Cihelková (ed.) Changes in Governance in the Context of the Global Crisis Praha: Nakladatelství Oeconomica.

  • Coy P.; Matlack C. & Meyer H. (2014) ‘The New Great Game: Why Ukraine Matters to So Many Other Nations’ Bloomberg Businessweek 27 February 2014. Retrieved from http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2014-02-27/the-newgreat-game-why-ukraine-matters-to-so-many-other-nations [accessed Sep 2014]

  • Hallen J. (2014) ‘Break Ukraine in Two’ Forbes 5 March 2014. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/jayhallen/2014/03/05/break-ukraine-in-two/ [accessed Sep 2014]

  • Horn N. (2014) ‘Ukraine im Griff mächtiger Clans’ Geolitico 1 March 2014. Retrieved from http://www.geolitico.de/2014/03/01/ukraine-im-griff-maechtigerclans/ [accessed Sep 2014]

  • Karatnycky A. (2014) ‘The Pushback in the Ukraine’ The New York Times 23 May 2014. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/24/opinion/the-pushbackin-ukraine.html [accessed Sep 2014]

  • Kuzio T. (2008) ‘Oligarchs wield power in Ukrainian Politics’ Eurasia Daily Monitor 1 July 2008. Retrieved from http://www.jamestown.org/single/?no_cache=1&tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=33765#.U_oJc8WwLSk [accessed Sep 2014]

  • Leshchenko S. (2011) ‘Tax Haven of Yanukovych and Kluyev’ Ukrainska Pravda 21 October 2011. Retrieved from http://eastbook.eu/en/2012/01/material-en/newsen/serhyi-leshchenko-tax-haven-of-yanukovych-and-kluyev/ [accessed Sep 2014]

  • Luhmann N. (1995) Social Systems Writing Science series Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  • Moskowitz P. (2014) ‘What does the West want from Ukraine?’ Aljazeera America 6 March 2014. Retrieved from http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2014/3/6/what-does-the-westwantfromukraine.html [accessed Sep 2014]

  • Nash J. (1950) Non-Cooperative Games: Dissertation Princeton: Princeton University.

  • North D. (1991) ‘Institutions’ The Journal of Economic Perspectives vol. 5 no. 1 pp. 97-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.5.1.97

  • Putnam R. (1988) ‘Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games’ International Organization vol. 42 no. 03 pp. 427-460. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027697

  • Ria Novosti (2013) ‘Ukraine-EU Deal to Entail Protective Measures - Putin’ 23 August

  • 2013. Retrieved from http://en.ria.ru/politics/20130823/182920979/Ukraine-EUDeal-to-Entail-Protective-Measures---Putin.html [accessed Sep 2014]

  • Sandford D. (2013) ‘Russia offers Ukraine major economic assistance’ BBC News 12 December 2013. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/worldeurope-25411118 [accessed Sep 2014]

  • Savin K. & Stein A. (2010) Einhundert Tage Präsidentschaft von Wiktor Janukowytsch.Berlin: Heinrich Böll Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.boell.de/de/navigation/europa-nordamerika-regierungszeit-wiktor-janukowytsch-9404.html [accessed Sep 2014]

  • Sommerbauer J. (2013) “Putins ‘Handelskrieg’ gegen Kiew” Die Presse 21 August 2013.

  • Tomz M. (2007) ‘Domestic Audience Costs in International Relations: An Experimental Approach’ International Organization vol. 61 no. 4 pp. 821-840. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0020818307070282.

  • Wilson A. (2005) Virtual Politics: Faking democracy in the post-Soviet world New Haven: Yale University Press.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.65

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.215
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.776

Cited By
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 148 80 5
PDF Downloads 92 55 3