The EU’s Difficulty in Translating Interests into Effective Foreign Policy Action: A Look at the Ukraine Crisis

Open access


The EU’s foreign policy response(s) to the unfolding Ukraine crisis has further illustrated its difficulty in making effective foreign policy decisions. Using a neoclassical realist analytical framework, this paper argues that although the EU did have tangible collective interests in pursuing its Ukraine foreign policy, it was unable to adequately filter these through its domestic setting. Three key constraints to the EU’s Ukrainian foreign policy> were identified: decision-makers ’ miscalculations; rigid normative demands; and a reliance on consensus politics. Ultimately, the Ukraine crisis illustrated that the EU, in current incarnation, cannot translate interests into effective foreign policies, even when making policy for their direct neighbourhood.

Averre, D. (2009), “Competing Rationalities: Russia, the EU and the ‘Shared Neighbourhood’,” Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 61, no. 10, pp. 1689–1713.

Bressand, A. (2011), ‘Between Kant and Machiavelli: EU foreign policy priorities in the 2010s,’ International Affairs, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 59–85.

Brooks, S. G. & Wohlforth, W. C. (2010), World Out of Balance: International Relations and the Challenge of American Primacy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Casier, T. (2011), “Russia’s Energy Leverage over the EU: Myth or Reality?” Perspectives on European Politics and Society, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 493–508.

Christou, G. (2010), ‘European Union security logics to the east: the European Neighbourhood Policy and the Eastern Partnership,’ European Security, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 413–430.

Copsey, N. & Pomorska, K. (2013), ‘The Influence of Newer Member States in the European Union: The Case of Poland and the Eastern Partnership,’ Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 421–443.

European Commission (2009), EU-Ukraine Association Agenda, Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.

—— (2013), EU-Ukraine Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area, Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.

European Council (2014), Joint statement on Crimea by President of the European Council Herman Van Rompuy and President of the European Commission José Manuel Barroso, Brussels: Council of the European Union.

Forsberg, T. (2013), “The power of the European Union: What explains the EU’s (lack of) influence on Russia?” Politique européenne, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 22–42.

Hamilton, P. (2014), ‘Professor Stephen Walt on the Crisis in Ukraine,’ Boston Global Forum. Retrieved from on-the-crisis-in-ukraine/ [accessed Apr 2014]

Hyde-Price, A. (2007), European Security in the Twenty-First Century: The Challenge of Multipolarity, New York: Routledge.

Keohane, R. & Nye, J. (1973), ‘Power and interdependence,’ Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 158–165.

Layne, C. (2012), “This Time It’s Real: The End of Unipolarity and the Pax Americana,” International Studies Quarterly, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 203–213.

Leonard, M. & Popescu, N. (2007), A Power Audit of EU-Russia Relations, London: European Council on Foreign Relations.

Petrovic, M. (2013), The Democratic Transition of Post-Communist Europe: In the Shadow of Communist Differences and Uneven EUropeanisation, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Pridham, G. (2005), Designing Democracy: EU Enlargement and Regime Change in Post-Communist Europe, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Rose, G. (1998), ‘Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy,’ World Politics, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 144–172.

Schweller, R. L. (2004), ‘Unanswered Threats: A Neoclassical Realist Theory of Underbalancing,’ International Security, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 159–201.

Sjöstedt, G. (1977), The External Role of the European Community, Farnborough: Saxon House.

Thomas, D. (2012), ‘Still Punching below Its Weight? Coherence and Effectiveness in European Union Foreign Policy,’ JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 457–474.

Toje, A. (2008), “The Consensus—Expectations Gap: Explaining Europe’s Ineffective Foreign Policy,” Security Dialogue, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 121–141.

—— (2011), ‘The European Union as a Small Power,’ JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 43–60.

Toje, A. & Kunz, B. (2012), ‘Introduction: neoclassical realism in Europe,’ in A. Toje and B. Kunz (eds.) Neoclassical Realism in European Politics: Bringing Power Back In, Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Whitman, R. G. (2011), Normative Power Europe: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Wohlforth, W. C. (1999), ‘The Stability of a Unipolar World,’ International Security, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 5–41.

Zielonka, J. (2013), “Europe’s new civilizing missions: the EU’s normative power discourse,” Journal of Political Ideologies, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 35–55.

Baltic Journal of European Studies

Tallinn Law School, Department of Law, School of Business and Governance, Tallinn University of Technology

Journal Information

CiteScore 2017: 0.50

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.199
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.223

Cited By


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 433 402 25
PDF Downloads 203 189 13