Smart Specialization and EU Eastern Innovation Cooperation: A Conceptual Approach

Open access

Abstract

The concept of smart specialization as a policy approach for regional development through increased regional productivity and competitiveness in the European context is actively discussed (European Union, 2009; OECD, 2014). Meanwhile, smart specialization has found its way into EU cohesion policy as well as into the European Commission’s Innovation Union flagship programme.

In Eastern Europe, economic growth came to a sudden halt during the financial crisis in 2008/2009, leading to mass unemployment, economic decline and shrinking public spending. The economic downturn in Russia after 2008 was triggered by the outflow of capital and avoided large-scale social consequences.

The paper highlights the main conceptual aspects of the smart specialization approach in the European Union and its implications on future EU Eastern Innovation cooperation with a special focus on EU’s largest Eastern partner Russia.

Acs, Z. (2002), Innovation and the Growth of Cities, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Anselin, L.; Varga, A. & Acs, Z. (1997), ‘Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations,’ Journal of Urban Economics, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 422–448.

Archibugi, D.; Filippetti, A. & Frenz, M. (2013a), ‘Economic crisis and innovation: Is destruction prevailing over accumulation?’ Research Policy, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 303–314.

—— (2013b), ‘The impact of the economic crisis on innovation: Evidence from Europe,’ Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 80, no. 7, pp. 1247–1260.

Barca, F. (2009), An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy: A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations. Independent report prepared at the request of Danuta Hübner, Commissioner for Regional Policy. Brussels: European Commission.

Belyakov, V.; Izosimova, A.; Koski, A.; Prause, G. & Rudzite, M. (2010), ‘Promoting Dynamic Interaction of Universities and Regional Stakeholders,’ in J. W. Kramer, G. Prause & J. Sepp (eds.) Baltic Business and Socio-Economic Development 2007, Third International Conference Tallinn, Estonia, June 17–19, 2007, Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag, pp. 401–444.

Bluhm, K.; Demmler, P.; Martens, B. & Trappmann, V. (2008), Fach- und Führungskräfte in mittelständischen Unternehmen: Bedarf, Rekrutierung und Bindung. Institut für Soziologie, Working Papers: Economic Sociology Jena, vol. 6.

Bussmann, K. & Werle, M. (2004), ‘Kriminalität – Standortfaktor für betriebliche Entscheidungen?’ Neue Kriminalpolitik, no. 3, pp. 90–95.

Brandt, A. (2010), ‘Branchenspezifische Standortfaktoren,’ RegioVision, vol. 3.

Camagni, R. & Capello, R. (2013), ‘Regional Innovation Patterns and the EU Regional Policy Reform,’ Growth and Change, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 355–389.

Capello, R. & Lenzi C. (2012), ‘Territorial patterns of innovation: A taxonomy of innovative regions in Europe,’ The Annals of Regional Science, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 119–154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00168-012-0539-8

Carlino, G.; Chatterjee, S. & Hunt, R. M. (2007), ‘Urban density and the rate of invention,’ Journal of Urban Economics, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 389–419.

Ciccone, A. & Hall, R. (1996), ‘Productivity and the Density of Economic Activity,’ American Economic Review, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 54–70.

Chinitz, B. (1961), ‘Contrasts in the agglomeration: New York and Pittsburgh,’ American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 279–289.

Clark, B. R. (2001), ‘The Entrepreneurial University: New Foundations for Collegiality, Autonomy, and Achievement,’ Higher Education Management, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 9–24.

Cooke, P. & Morgan, K. (1998), The Associational Economy: Firms, Regions, and Innovation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

David, P.; Foray, D. & Hall, B. (2009), Measuring Smart Specialisation: The Concept and the Need for Indicators. Knowledge for Growth Expert Group. Retrieved from http://cemi.epfl.ch/files/content/sites/cemi/files/users/178044/public/ Measuring%20smart%20specialisation.doc [accessed Apr 2014]

Duranton, G. & Puga, D. (2001), ‘Nursery Cities: Urban Diversity, Process Innovation, and the Life Cycle of Products,’ American Economic Review, vol. 91, no. 5, pp. 1454–1477.

EC (2003), The Role of the Universities in the Europe of Knowledge, Communication from the Commission Brussels, COM(2003)58 final, 05.02.2003.

—— (2010), Regional Policy Contributing to Smart Growth in Europe, Brussels: European Commission.

Etzkowitz, H. (2003), ‘Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University- Industry Government Relations,’ Social Science Information, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 293–337. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/05390184030423002

EU (2009), Guide to Research and Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialisations (RIS 3), Research policy, Luxembourg: European Union.

Filippetti, A. & Archibugi, D. (2011), ‘Innovation in times of crisis: National Systems of Innovation, structure, and demand,’ Research Policy, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 179–192.

Florida, R. (2002), The Rise of the Creative Class: And How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community & Everyday Life, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fujita, M. & Krugman, P. (2004), ‘The new economy geography: Past, present and the future,’ Papers in Regional Science, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 139–164.

GEM (2011), ‘Russia,’ Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2011, GEM 2011 Global Report, London: Global Entrepreneurship Research Association.

—— (2014), ‘GEM Global Report,’ Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2013, London: Global Entrepreneurship Research Association.

Goddard, J. (2000), The Response of HEIs to Regional Needs, Paris: OECD.

Hadjimichalis, C. & Hudson, R. (2007), ‘Rethinking Local and Regional Development: implications for radical political practice in Europe,’ European Urban and Regional Studies, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 99–113.

Hansmann, K. & Höck, M. (2001), Standort Norddeutschland, Hamburg: Universität Hamburg.

Hirsikoski, A.; Koski, A. & Prause, G. (2009), “Promoting Universities’ 3rd Task- Recommendations for University-Business Cooperation,” in G. Prause & T. Muravska (eds.) Baltic Business and Socio-Economic Development 2008, Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag, pp. 351–367.

Iammarino, S. & McCann, P. (2006), ‘The structure and evolution of industrial clusters: transactions, technology and knowledge spillovers,’ Research Policy, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 1018–1036.

Innovation Union Scoreboard (2013), Innovation Union Scoreboard, Brussels: European Union.

Jaffe, A.; Trajtenberg, M. & Henderson, R. (1993), ‘Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations,’ The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 577–598.

Kröhnert, S.; Morgenstern, A. & Klingholz, R. (2007), Talente, Technology und Toleranz – wo Deutschland Zukunft hat, Berlin: Berlin-Institut für Bevölkerung und Entwicklung.

Krugman, P. (1991), ‘Increasing returns and economic geography,’ Journal of Political Economy, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 483–499.

Martens, B.; Michailow, M. & Schmidt, R., eds. (2003), Managementkulturen im Umbruch, Sonderforschungsbereich 580, vol. 10.

McCann, P. (2008), ‘Globalisation and economic geography: the world is curved, not flat,’ Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 351–370.

McCann, P. & Acs, Z. (2011), ‘Globalisation: countries, cities and multinationals,’ Regional Studies, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 17–32.

McCann, P. & Ortega-Argiles, R. (2013), ‘Modern regional innovation policy,’ Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 187–216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rst007

—— (2014, in press), ‘Smart Specialisation, Regional Growth and Applications to European Union Cohesion Policy,’ Regional Studies. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0 0343404.2013.799769

Meier zu Köcker, G. (2008), Clusters in Germany: An Empirical-based Insight View on Emergence, Financing, Management and Competitiveness of the Most Innovative Clusters in Germany, Berlin: Institute for Innovation and Technology & Initiative Competence Networks Germany.

Niebuhr, A. (2006), ‘Migration and Innovation. Does Cultural Diversity Matter for Regional R&D Activity?’ HWWI Research Paper, vol. 3, no. 1, Hamburg: Hamburg Institute for International Economics.

OECD (2010), Typology of regional innovation systems, Paris: OECD.

—— (2011), Territorial Outlook, Paris: OECD.

—— (2014), Innovation-driven Growth in Regions: The Role of Smart Specialisation, Paris: OECD.

van Oort, F. (2004), Urban Growth and Innovation: Spatially Bounded Externalities in the Netherlands, Aldershot: Ashgate.

Porter, M. E. (1990), The Competitive Advantage of Nations, New York: The Free Press.

—— (2000), ‘Location, Competition and Economic Development: Local Networks in a Global Economy,’ Economic Development Quarterly, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 15–34. Prause, G. (2014, in press), ‘University – Business Interaction in Times of Demographic Change,’ Innovations.

Prause, G. & Hunke, K. (2012), ‘University – Business Interaction in the Context of Demographic Change,’ in T. Muravska & G. Prause (eds.) European Integration and Baltic Sea Region Studies: University-Business Partnership through the Triple Helix Approach, Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag, pp. 188–199.

Prause, G. & Winkler, K. (2011), “Universities’ third task: On the way towards the entrepreneurial university – A German Case Study,’ in G. Prause, U. Venesaar (eds.) University-Business Cooperation: Tallinn 2011, Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts- Verlag, pp. 52–63.

Radosevic, S. (2002), ‘Regional innovation systems in Central and Eastern Europe: determinants, organizers and alignments,’ The Journal of Technology Transfer, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 87–96.

Sternberg, R. (2011), ‘Interregional Disparities, Entrepreneurship, and EU Regional Policy,’ in M. Minniti (ed.) The Dynamics of Entrepreneurship. Evidence from the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Data, Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 153–80.

Thurner, T. (2014, in press), “Innovation in turbulent times – Russia’s North-Western Federal District and the financial crisis,” Regional Studies.

Baltic Journal of European Studies

Tallinn Law School, Department of Law, School of Business and Governance, Tallinn University of Technology

Journal Information


CiteScore 2017: 0.22

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.119
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.113

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 69 69 11
PDF Downloads 17 17 4