Regulatory Patterns of the Internet Development: Expanding the Role of Private Stakeholders through Mediatized “Self-regulation”

Open access

Abstract

This article studies the Internet from an evolutionary point of view, based on historic analysis, to confirm institutional change predictions suggested by Utterback’s innovation development theory. It explores the appearance of rules and the consolidation of public and private initiatives that could enhance the capacity of the private sector to coregulate in the digital sphere, which is especially relevant to the field of electronic commerce-related transactions. This institutional review distinguishes between two distinct layers of the Internet. Also, formal and informal regulatory patterns are identified in their evolutionary stages, revealing the prevailing models: unregulated, self-regulated, co-regulated, or regulated. These conceptual associations aim to provide a framework scheme to further study specific topics in the fields of Internet governance, digital economy, and the information society. This primer should also induce interdisciplinary research, for better understanding on how rules influence digital innovation and behaviour, in practice. Implicit in this account is that most of the credit for the efficient development of these technologies, in their two layers, during their first stages, might be attributed to the availability of collective, collaborating, or independent self-regulatory capacity. The most immediate observations show a growing tendency towards over-prescriptive regulatory systems, promoted to control its use and content; incompatible with the needs and interests of the majority of stakeholders. A concluding claim is that the Internet and telecommunication technologies in general, considered as enabling mediums, would benefit from dynamic and mixed regulatory solutions, according to and depending on whether their object is their infrastructure or the surface layer of its applications.

References
  • Abbate, J. (2001), ‘Government, Business, and the Making of the Internet,’ BusinessHistory Review, no. 75, pp. 147-176. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3116559

  • Anttiroiko, A. V. (2001), ‘Toward the European information society,’ Communicationsof the ACM, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 31-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/357489.357501

  • Argyres, N. & Mayer, K. J. (2007), ‘Contract design as a firm capability: An integration of learning and transaction cost perspectives,’ Academy ofManagement Review, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 1060-1077. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.26585739

  • Berkes, F. (2006), ‘From community-based resource management to complex systems: the scale issue and marine commons,’ Ecology and Society, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 45.

  • Berman, F.; Fox, G. & Hey, A. J. G., eds. (2003), Grid Computing: Making the GlobalInfrastructure a Reality, vol. 2, Chichester: Wiley.

  • Boyle, J. (1997), ‘A politics of intellectual property: Environmentalism for the Net?’ Duke Law Journal, vol. 47: 87, pp. 87-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1372861

  • -- (2009), The Public Domain: Enclosing the Commons of the Mind, Ney Haven & London: Yale University Press.

  • Brown, I. (2010), ‘Internet Self-Regulation and Fundamental Rights (January 21, 2010),’ Index on Censorship, vol. 1 (March 2010). Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1539942 [accessed May 2013] Brousseau, E. (2004), ‘Property rights on the internet: is a specific institutional framework needed?’ Economics of Innovation and New Technology, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 489-507. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1043859042000188737

  • -- (2004), ‘Property rights in the digital space,’ in E. Colombatto (ed.) Companion toEconomics of Property Rights, Cheltenham & Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publications, pp. 438-472.

  • Bygrave, L. A. (2002), ‘Online dispute resolution-what it means for consumers.’ Paper presented at the conference ‘Domain Name Systems and Internet Governance’ on 7 May 2002 at the University of New South Wales, Sydney.

  • Canavilhas, J. (2011), ‘El nuevo ecosistema mediático,’ index. comunicación, vol. 1, pp. 13-24.

  • Castells, M. (1996), The Rise of the Network Society. Volume I of The Information Age:Economy, Society and Culture, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing.

  • -- (1997), The Power of Identity. Volume II of The Information Age: Economy,Society and Culture, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing.

  • -- (1998), End of Millennium, Volume III of The Information Age: Economy, Societyand Culture, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

  • Cerf G. V. & Kahn E. R. (1974), ‘A Protocol for Packet Network Intercommunication,’ IEEE Trans on Comms, vol 22, no. 5 May 1974. Retrieved from http://www.cs.princeton.edu/courses/archive/fall06/cos561/papers/cerf74.pdf [accessed May 2013]

  • CERN (2005), A Little History of the World Wide Web: From 1960s to 1995. Retrieved from http://ref.web.cern.ch/ref/CERN/CNL/2001/001/www-history/ [accessed May 2013]

  • Chang, S. B. & Chang, S. M. (2009), ‘A meta-analysis of the innovation issue: Based on the technology management field,’ Industrial Engineering and EngineeringManagement, 2009. IEEM 2009. IEEE International Conference, pp. 1875-1879.

  • Clark, E.; Cho, G. & Hoyle, A. (2003), ‘Online dispute resolution: Present realities, pressing problems and future prospects,’ International Review of Law,Computers & Technology, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 7-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1360086032000063084

  • Cole, S. J. & Underhill, C. I. (2010), ‘Fifteen Years of ODR Experience: The BBB Online Reliability Trust Mark Program,’ UCC Law Journal, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 443-478.

  • Croon F. A. & Jakobsson, M. (2002), ‘Beyond use and design: the dialectics of being in virtual worlds,’ Digital Creativity, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 39-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1076/digc.13.1.39.3207

  • Cybertelecom (n.d.), Timeline: Internet, Federal Govt, and Communications. Retrieved from http://www.cybertelecom.org/notes/timeline.htm [accessed on 30 April 2013]

  • -- (2012), Federal Internet Law & Policy An Educational Project. Retrieved February 20, 2013, from http://www.cybertelecom.org/ [accessed May 2013]

  • Damasio, M. J.; Henriques, S. & Costa, C. Á. O. (2012), ‘Virtual communities and social activities: reframing the online experience,’ International Journal of WebBased Communities, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 159-176.

  • Del Duca, L., Rule, C., & Loebl, Z. (2011), ‘Facilitating Expansion of Cross-Border E-Commerce-Developing a Global Online Dispute Resolution System (Lessons Derived from Existing ODR Systems-Work of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law),’ Penn State Law Legal Studies Research Paper, vol. 1, no. 1.

  • Del Duca, L.; Rule, C. & Rogers, V. (2010), ‘Designing a Global Consumer Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) System for Cross-Border Small Value-High Volume Claims-OAS Developments. UCC Law Journal, vol. 42, p. 221.

  • DeLong, J. B. & Magin, K. (2006), A Short Note on the Size of the Dot-Com Bubble, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper no. 12011.

  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983), ‘The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields,’ AmericanSociological Review, vol. 48 (April), pp. 147-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2095101

  • Drezner, D. W. (2004), ‘The global governance of the Internet: Bringing the state back in,’ Political Science Quarterly, vol. 119, no. 3, pp. 477-498. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/20202392

  • Dunne, R. L. (1994), ‘Deterring Unauthorized Access to Computers: Controlling Behavior in Cyberspace through a Contract Law Paradigm,’ Jurimetrics Journal, vol. 35, no. 1.

  • Dutton, W. H.; Dopatka, A.; Hills, M.; Law, G. & Nash, V. (2010), Freedom ofConnection - Freedom of Expression: The Changing Legal and Regulatory EcologyShaping the Internet or Dutton, W. H. et al. (2011), Freedom of Connection -Freedom of Expression: The Changing Legal and Regulatory Ecology Shapingthe Internet, Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1654464 [accessed May 2013]

  • Dutton, W. H. & Peltu, M. (2007), ‘The emerging Internet governance mosaic: connecting the pieces,’ Journal of Information Polity, vol. 12, nos. 1-2, pp. 63-81.

  • EC (2009), Internet of Things: An Action Plan for Europe, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament,the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM (2009) 278 final. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2009:0278:FIN:EN:PDF [accessed May 2013]

  • EDRI (2013), Copyright: Challenges of the Digital Era, European Digital RightsPapers, No. 7. Retrieved from http://www.edri.org/files/paper07_copyright.pdf [accessed April 2013]

  • Ellison, N. B. (2007), ‘Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship,’ Journalof Computer-Mediated Communication, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 210-230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.10836101.2007.00393.x

  • Eurostat (n.d.), Telecommunication statistics: Eurostat. Retrieved from http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/Telecommunication_statistics [last accessed April 2013]

  • Eveleens, C. (2010), ‘Innovation management; a literature review of innovation process models and their implications,’ Science, 800 (2010), p. 900.

  • Fuchs, C. (2007), ‘Towards a dynamic theory of virtual communities,’ InternationalJournal of Knowledge and Learning, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 372-403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJKL.2007.016701

  • Gibbons, L. J. (1996), ‘No Regulation, Government Regulation, or Self-Regulation: Social Enforcement or Social Contracting for Governance in Cyberspace,’ CornellJL and Pub. Pol’y, vol. 6, pp. 475-529.

  • Goldsmith, J. L. (2000[1998]), ‘Regulation of the Internet: Three Persistent Fallacies,’ Chicago-Kent Law Review, vol. 73, pp. 1119-1131. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=204632 [accessed May 2013]

  • Goldsmith, J. L. & Wu, T. (2006), Who Controls the Internet?: Illusions of a BorderlessWorld, Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Google (n.d.), Our History in Depth. Retrieved from http://www.google.com/intl/en/about/company/history/ [accessed May 2013]

  • Google IPv6 (n.d.), What if the Internet Ran out of Room? In fact it is already happening. Retrieved from https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6 [accessed May 2013]

  • Grier, D. A. & Campbell, M. (2000), ‘A social history of Bitnet and Listserv, 1985-1991,’ Annals of the History of Computing, IEEE, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 32-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/85.841135

  • Griset, P. & Schafer, V. (2011), ‘Hosting the World Wide Web Consortium for Europe: from CERN to INRIA,’ History and Technology, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 353-370. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07341512.2011.604177

  • Gurstein, M. (2003), ‘Effective use: A community informatics strategy beyond the digital divide,’ First Monday, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.5210/fm.v8i12.1107

  • Halpin, E. F. & Simpson, S. (2002), ‘Between self-regulation and intervention in the networked economy: the European Union and Internet policy,’ Journal ofInformation Science, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 285-296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016555150202800403

  • Hervás Soriano, F. & Mulatero, F. (2010), ’Knowledge Policy in the EU: From the Lisbon Strategy to Europe 2020,’ Journal of the Knowledge Economy, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 289-302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13132-010-0020-9

  • Hjarvard, S. (2008), ‘The Mediatization of Society. A Theory of the Media as Agents of Social and Cultural Change,’ Nordicom Review, vol. 29, pp. 105-134.

  • Hodges, C. J.; Benöhr, I. & Creutzfeldt-Banda, N. (2012), Consumer ADR in Europe, Oxford: Hart Publishing.

  • Huded, G. & King, K. F. (2010), ‘Foreword: Maturing Internet Studies,’ Nw. UL Rev., vol. 104, p. 427.

  • IAB (1996), Architectural Principles of the Internet, Memo of Internet Architecture Board from June 1996, ed. by B. E. Carpenter. Retrieved from http://www.rfceditor.org/rfc/rfc1958.txt [accessed May 2013]

  • ICT Statistics (n.d.), ICT Statistics of International Telecommunications Union. Retrieved from http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/stat/default.aspx [accessed May 2013]

  • ICU (n.d.), Official website of International Telecommunications Union. Retrieved from http://www.itu.int/wsis/docs/geneva/official/dop.html [accessed 30 March 2013]

  • IETF (n.d.), The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Retrieved from https://www.ietf.org/ [accessed May 2013]

  • IGF (n.d.), Official website of Internet Governance Forum. Retrieved from http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/ [accessed May 2013]

  • Internet2 (n.d.), Internet2: The First 10 Years. Retrieved from http://www.internet2.edu/about/timeline/ [accessed May 2013]

  • ISOC (n.d.), The Internet Society. Retrieved from http://www.internetsociety.org/ [accessed May 2013]

  • ITU (2005), The Internet of Things: ITU Internet Reports 2005, Executive Summary. Retrieved from http://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-s/opb/pol/S-POL-IR.IT-2005-SUM-PDF-E.pdf [accessed May 2013

  • Jensen, C. (2003), ‘The more things change, the more they stay the same: Copyright, digital technology, and social norms,’ Stanford Law Review, pp. 531-570.

  • Joamets, K. & Solarte-Vasquez, M. C. S. (2004), Legal Environment of Business:Textbook, Tallinn: Tallinn University of Technology Press.

  • Kanter, J. P. (1998), Understanding Thin-Client/Server Computing, Redmond: Microsoft Press.

  • Kaptelinin, V. & Nardi, B. A. (2006), Acting with Technology: Activity Theory andInteraction Design, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Katsh, E. & Rainey, D. (2001), ‘Online dispute resolution: Some lessons from the e-commerce revolution,’ N. Ky. L. Rev., vol. 28, p. 810.

  • Kleinrock, L. (2010), ‘An early history of the Internet [History of Communications],’ Communications Magazine, IEEE, vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 26-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2010.5534584

  • Krcmar, H.; Friesike, S.; Böhm, M. & Schildhauer, T. (2012), ‘Innovation, Society and Business: Internet-Based Business Models and Their Implications,’ HIIGDiscussion Paper Series, No. 2012-07.

  • Kshetri, N. B. (2001), ‘Determinants of the locus of global e-commerce,’ Electronic Markets, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 250-257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/101967801753405535

  • Leaffer, M. (1995), ‘Protecting Author’s Rights in a Digital Age,’ U. Tol. L. Rev., vol. 27, no. 1.

  • Lee, C. S. (2001), ‘An analytical framework for evaluating e-commerce business models and strategies,’ Internet Research, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 349-359. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10662240110402803

  • Lee, E. A. (2000), ‘What’s ahead for embedded software?’ Computer, vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 18-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/2.868693

  • Leiner, B. M.; Cerf, V. G.; Clark, D. D.; Kahn, R. E.; Kleinrock, L.; Lynch,D. C., Postel. J; Roberts, L. G. & Wolff, S. (2009), ‘A brief history of the Internet,’ Computer Communication Review, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 22-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1629607.1629613

  • Lessig, L. (2001), The Future of Ideas: The Fate of the Commons in a Connected World, New York: Vintage Books.

  • -- (2006), Code: And Other Laws of Cyberspace, Version 2.0, New York: Basic Books.

  • Licklider, J. C. R. (1960), ‘Man-computer symbiosis,’ IRE Transactions on HumanFactors in Electronics, vol. HFE-1, pp. 4-11. Retrieved from http://groups.csail.mit.edu/medg/people/psz/Licklider.html [accessed May 2013]

  • Licklider, J. C. & Taylor, R. W. (1968), ‘The computer as a communication device,’ Science and Technology, vol. 76, no. 2, p. 20-41.

  • Li, Y. M. & Yeh, Y. S. (2010), ‘Increasing trust in mobile commerce through design aesthetics,’ Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 673-684. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.01.004

  • McGarty, T. P. (2000), The Evolution of International Internet Telephony, Paper presented at Telecommunciations Policy Research Conference on Sept.23-25, 2000, Washington, DC.

  • Mak, V. & Nemeth, K. (2012), ‘The EU’s Digital Agenda: new proposals for online and offline consumer disputes, e-commerce and card, internet and mobile payments,’ Zeitschrift für Europäisches Unternehmens-und Verbraucherrecht, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 112-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13590-012-0007-9

  • Malerba, F. (2005), ‘Sectoral systems of innovation: a framework for linking innovation to the knowledge base, structure and dynamics of sectors,’ Economics of Innovationand New Technology, vol. 14, no. 1-2, pp. 63-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1043859042000228688

  • Milton L. M. (2010), Networks and States: The Global Politics of Internet Governance, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Maskus, K. E. (2000), Intellectual Property Rights in the Global Economy, Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.

  • May, C. (2000), A Global Political Economy of Intellectual Property Rights: The NewEnclosures? London: Routledge.

  • Microsoft (n.d.), Microsoft Corporation. A history of Windows: Highlights from the first 25 years 1975-1981: Microsoft boots up. Retrieved from http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/history [accessed 2 April 2013]

  • Mowery, D. C. & Simcoe, T. (2002), ‘Is the Internet a US invention?-an economic and technological history of computer networking,’ Research Policy, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 1369-1387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00069-0

  • Mueller, M. (1999), ‘ICANN and Internet governance: sorting through the debris of “self-regulation”,’ info, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 497-520.

  • Norris, P. (2003), Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, And theInternet Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Ottaway, M. & Hamzawy, A. (2011), Protest Movements and Political Change in theArab World, Policy Outlook, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

  • Pearce, G. & Platten, N. (2002), ‘Promoting the Information Society: The EU Directive on Electronic Commerce,’ European Law Journal, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 363-378. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/14680386.00113

  • Pechman, R. J. (1998), ‘Seeking Multilateral Protection for Intellectual Property: The United States “TRIPs” over Special 301,’ Minn. J. Global Trade, vol. 7, p. 179.

  • Perez, C. (2004), ‘Technological revolutions, paradigm shifts and socio-institutional change,’ in E. Reinert (ed.), Globalization, Economic Development and Inequality, Cheltenham & Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, pp. 217-242. Retrieved from http://carlotaperez.org/papers/TRs%20TEP%20shifts%20and%20SIF%20ch.pdf [accessed May 2013]

  • Poblet, M., ed. (2011), Mobile Technologies for Conflict Management: Online DisputeResolution, Governance, Participation, Law, Governance and Technology Series, vol. 2, Dordrecht, London, etc.: Springer.

  • Postel, J. B., Sunshine, C. A., & Cohen, D. (1981), ‘The ARPA internet protocol,’ Computer Networks (1976), vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 261-271.

  • Radin, M. P. & Wagner, R. P. (1999), ‘The myth of private ordering: rediscovering legal realism in cyberspace,’ SSRN Working Paper Series. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=162488 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.162488 [accessed May 2013]

  • Reichman, J. H. (1995), ‘Universal minimum standards of intellectual property protection under the TRIPS component of the WTO agreement,’ In Int’l L., vol. 29, no. 2, p. 345-388.

  • Riley, M. C. (2011), ‘Disruptive Internet Innovation and Communications Law,’ SSRNWorking Paper Series. Retrieved from SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1933611 [accessed May 2013]

  • Rückriem, G. (2009), ‘Digital technology and mediation: A challenge to activity theory,’ in A. Sannino, H. Daniels & K. D. Gutierrez (eds.) Learning and Expanding withActivity Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 88-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809989.007

  • Rustad, M. L. (2009), ‘Internet Law in a Nutshell,’ in M. L. Rustad (ed.) Internet Lawin a Nutshell, Eagan: West Group.

  • Rustad, M. L. & Daftary, C. (2001), E-Business Legal Handbook, New York: Panel Publishers.

  • Rustad, M. L. & D’Angelo, D. (2011), ‘Path of Internet Law: An Annotated Guide to Legal Landmarks,’ The. Duke L. & Tech. Rev., vol. 2011, no. 012.

  • Saldías, O. (2012), ‘Patterns of Legalization in the Internet: Do We Need a Constitutional Theory for Internet Law?’ HIIG Discussion Paper Series, no. 8; Humboldt Universität Zu Berlin, Internet & Society Working Paper No. 2/11. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1942161 [accessed May 2013] Samuelson, P. (1990), ‘Digital media and the changing face of intellectual property law,’ RutgersComputer & Tech. L.J., vol. 16, pp. 323-340.

  • Schultz, T. (2004), ‘Does online dispute resolution need governmental intervention?’ North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology, vol. 6, p. 71.

  • -- (2006), An Essay on the Role of Government for ODR: Theoretical Considerationsabout the Future of ODR. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=896678 [accessed May 2013]

  • SIIA (2008), Software and Information: Driving the Global Knowledge Community, Washington, DC: Software & Information Industry Association.

  • Spencer, L. & Dale, A. (1979), ‘Integration and regulation in organizations: A contextual approach,’ The Sociological Review, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 679-702. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467954X.1979.tb00355.x

  • Swilley, E.; Hofacker, C. F. & Lamont, B. T. (2012), ‘The evolution from e-commerce to m-commerce: pressures, firm capabilities and competitive advantage in strategic decision making,’ International Journal of E-Business Research (IJEBR), vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/jebr.2012010101

  • Utterback, J. M. (1996), Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

  • Utterback, J. M. & Abernathy, W. J. (1975), ‘A dynamic model of process and product innovation,’ Omega, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 639-656. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(75)90068-7

  • Van Dijk, J. & Hacker, K. (2003), ‘The digital divide as a complex and dynamic phenomenon,’ The Information Society, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 315-326. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01972240309487

  • Vermesan, O.; Friess, P.; Guillemin, P.; Gusmeroli, S.; Sundmaeker, H.; Bassi, A.;Jubert, I. S.; Mazura, M.; Harrison, M.; Eisenhauer, M. & Doody, P. (2011), ‘Internet of things strategic research roadmap,’ in Internet of Things-GlobalTechnological and Societal Trends, pp. 10-52.

  • Wahab, M. (2004), ‘Globalisation and ODR: dynamics of change in e-commerce dispute settlement,’ International Journal of Law and Information Technology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 123-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/12.1.123

  • Waz, J. & Weiser, P. (2013), ‘Internet governance: the role of multistakeholder organisations,’ Journal on Telecommunications & High Technology Law, vol.10, no. 2, pp. 331-445.

  • Weber, A. M. (2003), ‘Council of Europe’s Convention on Cybercrime,’ The BerkeleyTech. LJ, vol. 18, p. 425.

  • Wilkinson, I. & Young, L. (2012), ‘Innovation and Evolution of Business Relations and Networks: Theory and Method.’ Retrieved from arXiv preprint arXiv:1203.1332.

  • Whitworth, B. & Ahmad, A. (2013), The Social Design of Technical Systems: Buildingtechnologies for communities. Aarhus, Denmark: The Interaction Design Foundation. Online book retrieved from http://www.interactiondesign.org/books/the_social_design_of_technical_systems.html [accessed May 2013] http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJNVO.2012.047878

  • Whitworth, B. & Sylla, C. (2012), ‘A social environment model of socio-technical performance,’ International Journal for Networking and Virtual Organizations, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1-29.

  • Wu, T. (2006), ‘Network Neutrality: Competition, Innovation, and Non-discriminatory Access.’ Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=903118 [accessed May 2013]

  • Webster, F. (2006), Theories of the Information Society, New York: Routledge.

  • Worldwidewebsize (2013), The Size of the World Wide Web (the Internet). Retrieved from http://www.worldwidewebsize.com/ [accessed May 2013]

  • Yoo, C. S. (2010), ‘Is the Internet a maturing market? If so, what does that imply?’ Communications of the ACM, vol. 53, no. 8, pp. 24-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1787234.1787243

  • Yoo, Y.; Lyytinen, K. J.; Boland, R. J. & Berente, N. (2010), ‘The Next Wave of Digital Innovation: Opportunities and Challenges: A Report on the Research Workshop “Digital Challenges in Innovation Research”.’ Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1622170 [accessed May 2013]

  • Zakon, R. H. (2000), Hobbes’ Internet Timeline. Retrieved from http://courseweb.lt.unt.edu/gjones/spr2011/ltec3530/pdf/www.zakon.org_robert.pdf [accessed May 2013]

  • Zittrain, J. L. (2009), The Future of the Internet: And How to Stop It, New Haven & London: Yale University Press.

Baltic Journal of European Studies

Tallinn Law School, Department of Law, School of Business and Governance, Tallinn University of Technology

Journal Information


CiteScore 2016: 0.21

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.140

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 28 28 21
PDF Downloads 4 4 3