Implant placement in the esthetic zone is a complex procedure and requires a restoration-driven approach. Proper selection of patients and implant together with individual assessment of the risk of esthetic complications are very important. Correct 3D-implant positioning and sufficient bone volume should provide long-term esthetic and function. Esthetic region is a zone in which expectations and possibilities collide. Clinician should bring the important decision on the appropriate time of implant placement. Immediate implant placement is particularly challenging in the esthetic zone. Patient desire for reduced treatment time should be weighed against the possible risk factors. Protocol of immediate implant placement in conditions of unfavourable gingival biotypes, the lack of bone or soft tissue in patients with a high smile line lead to esthetic failure which is very important in the esthetic region.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
1. Buser D Belser U Wismcijer D. Implant Therapy in the Esthetic Zone - Single Tooth Replacements. Berlin; London: Quintessence 2007.
2. Chen S. Buser D. Implant Placement in Post-Extraction Sites - Treatment Options. Berlin; London: Quintessence 2008.
3. Wismeijer D Chen S Buser D. Extended Edentulous Spaces in the Anterior Zone. Berlin; London: Quintessence 2013.
4. Turri A Rossetti PH Canullo L Grusovin MG Dahlin C. Prevalence of Peri-implantitis in Medically Compromised Patients and Smokers: A Systematic Review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2016;31:111-118.
5. Bornstein MM Cionca N Mombelli A. Systemic conditions and treatments as risks for implant therapy. Int I Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:12-27.
6. Gomez-Moreno G Aguilar-Salvatierra A Pemandez-Cejas E Delgado-Ruiz RA Markovic A Calvo- Guirado JL. Dental implant surgery in patients in treatment with the anticoagulant oral rivaroxaban. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016;27:730-733.
7. Cochran D Schou S Heitz-Mayfield LJ Bornstein MM Salvi GE Martin WC. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding risk factors in implant therapy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:86-89.
8. Zhou Y Gao J Luo L Wang Y. Does Bruxism Contribute to Dental Implant Failure? A Systematic Review and Meta- Analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2016;18:4104-20.
9. Boardman N Darby I Chen S. A retrospective evaluation of aesthetic outcomes for Single-tooth implants in the anterior maxilla. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016;27:443-451.
10. Chen ST Buser D. Clinical and esthetic outcomes of implants placed in postcxtracnon sites. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:186-217.
11. Gehrke SA Perez-Albacete Martinez C Piattelli A Shibli A Markovic A Calvo Guirado L. The influence of three different apical implant designs at stability and osseointegration process: experimental study in rabbits. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016 Mar. DOI: 10.1111/clr.12807.
12. Markovic A Calvo-Guirado L Lazic Z Gomez-Moreno G Calasan D Guardia J et al. Evaluation of primary stability of self-tapping and non-self-tapping dental implants. Atz-week clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2013;15:341-349.
13. Wallkamm B Ciocco M Ettlin D Syfrig B Abbott W Listrom R et al. Three-year outcomes of Straumann Bone Level SL Active dental implants in daily dental practice: a prospective non- interventional study. Quintessence Int 2015;46:591-602.
14. Delgado-Ruiz RA Gomez Moreno G Aguilar-Salvatierra A Markovic A Mate-Sanchez JE Calvo-Guirado JL. Human fetal osteoblast behavior of zirconia dental implants and zirconia disks with microstructured surfaces. An experimental in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015 Mar 25. DOI: 10.1111/clr.12585.
15. Delgado-Ruiz RA Markovic A Calvo-Guirado JL Lazic Z Plattelli A Boticelli D et al. Implant stability and marginal bone level of microgrooved zirconia dental implants: A 3-month experimental study on dogs. Vojnosanit Pregl 2014:451-461.
16. Chen S. Buser D Wismeijer D. Ridge Augmentation Procedures in Implant Patients - A Staged Approach. Berlin; London: Quintessence 2014.