Use of classification and regression trees (CART) for analyzing determinants of winter wheat yield variation among fields in Poland

Open access


Wheat is one of the modern world’s staple food sources. Its production requires good environmental conditions, which are not always available. However, agricultural practices may mitigate the effects of unfavorable weather or poor-quality soils. The influence of environmental and crop management variables on yield can be evaluated only based on representative long-term data collected on farms through well-prepared surveys.The authors of this work analyzed variation in winter wheat yield among 3868 fields in western and eastern Poland for 12 years, as dependent on both soil/weather and crop management factors, using the classification and regression tree (CART) method. The most important crop management deficiencies which may cause low wheat yields are insufficient use of fungicides, phosphorus deficiency, non-optimal date of sowing, poor quality of seeds, failure to apply herbicides, lack of crop rotation, and use of cultivars of unknown origin not suitable for the region. Environmental variables of great importance for the obtaining of high yields include large farm size (10 ha or larger) and good-quality soils with stable pH. This study makes it possible to propose strategies supporting more effective winter wheat production based on the identification of characteristics that are crucial for wheat cultivation in a given region.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Bertelsen J.R. de Neergaard E. Smedegaard-Petersen V. (2001): Fungicidal effects of azoxystrobin and epoxiconazole on phylloshere fungi senescence and yield of winter wheat. Plant Pathol. 50: 190-205.

  • Breiman L. Friedman J.H. Olshen R.A. Stone C.J. (1984): Classification and Regression Trees. Chapman and Hall (Wadsworth Inc.) US New York.

  • CSO. Central Statistical Office. Concise Statistical Yearbook of Poland. (2017): Available online: (accessed on 4 January 2018).

  • Dacko M. Zając T. Synowiec A. Oleksy A. Klimek-Kopyra A. Kulig B. (2016): New approach to determine biological and environmental factors influencing mass of a single pea (Pisum sativum L.) seed in Silesia region in Poland using a CART model. Eur. J. Agron. 74: 29-37.

  • Delmotte S. Tittonell P. Mouret J.C. Hammond R. Lopez-Ridaura S. (2011): On farm assessment of rice yield variability and productivity gaps between organic and conventional cropping systems under Mediterranean climate. European Journal of Agronomy 35(4): 223-236.

  • Fallahi H.A. Nasseri A. Siadat A. (2008): Wheat Yield Components are Positively Influenced by Nitrogen Application under Moisture Deficit Environments. International Journal of Agriculture & Biology 10: 673-676.

  • Ferraro D.O. Rivero D.E. Ghersa C.M. (2009): An analysis of the factors that influence sugarcane yield in Northern Argentina using classification and regression trees. Field Crops Research 112(2-3): 149-157.

  • Girma K. Holtz S.L. Arnall D.B. Fultz L.M. Hanks T.L. Lawles K.D. Mack C.J. Owen K.W. Reed S.D. Santillano J. Walsh O. White M.J. Raun W.R. (2007): Weather Fertilizer Previous Year Yield and Fertilizer Levels Affect Ensuing Year Fertilizer Response of Wheat. Agronomy Journal 99:1607-1614.

  • Gornott C. Wechsung F. (2016): Statistical regression models for assessing climate impacts on crop yields: A validation study for winter wheat and silage maize in Germany. Agric. For. Meteorol. 217: 89-100.

  • Krupnik T.J. Ahmed Z.U. Timsina J. Yasmin S. Hossain F. Al Mamun A. Mridha A.I. McDonald A.J. (2015): Untangling crop management and environmental influences on wheat yield variability in Bangladesh: an application of non-parametric approaches. Agricultural Systems 139: 166-179.

  • Lazaro L. Abbate P.E. Cogliatti D.H. Andrade F.H. (2010): Relationship between yield growth and spike weight under phosphorus deficiency and shading. Journal of Agricultural Science 148: 83-93.

  • Lobell D.B. Ortiz-Monasterio J.I. Asner G.P. Naylor R.L. Falcon W.P. (2005): Combining field surveys remote sensing and regression trees to understand yield variations in an irrigated wheat landscape. Agronomy Journal 97(1): 241-249.

  • Lobell D. Ortiz-Monasterio J. Addams C. Asner G. (2002): Soil climate and management impacts on regional wheat productivity in Mexico from remote sensing. Agric. For. Meteorol. 114: 31–43.

  • Loyce C. Meynard J.M. Bouchard C. Rolland B. Lonnet P. Bataillon P. Bernicot M.H. Bonnefoy M. Charrier X. Debote B. Demarquet T. Duperrier B. Félix I. Heddadj D. Leblanc O. Leleu M. Mangin P. Méausoone M. Doussinault G. (2008): Interaction between cultivar and crop management effects on winter wheat diseases lodging and yield. Crop protection 27(7): 1131-1142.

  • Macholdt J. Honermeier B. (2017): Yield Stability in Winter Wheat Production: A Survey on German Farmers’ and Advisors’ Views. Agronomy 7(3): 45.

  • Mercer P.C. Ruddock A. (2005): Disease management of winter wheat with reduced doses of fungicides in Northern Ireland. Crop Prot. 24: 221-228.

  • Montesino-San Martína M. Olesen J.E. Porter J.R. (2014): A genotype environment and management (GxExM) analysis of adaptation in winter wheat to climate change in Denmark. Agric. For. Meterol. 187: 1-13.

  • Reidsma P. Ewert F. Lansink A.O. Leemans R. (2010): Adaptation to climate change and climate variability in European agriculture: The importance of farm level responses. Eur. J. Agron. 32: 91-102.

  • Roel A. Firpo H. Plant R.E. (2007): Why do some farmers get higher yields? Multivariate analysis of a group of Uruguayan rice farmers. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 58(1): 78-92.

  • Rozbicki J. Ceglinska A. Gozdowski D. Jakubczak M. Cacak-Pietrzak G. Mądry W. Golba J. Sobczynski G. Studnicki M. Drzaga T. (2015): Influence of the cultivar environment and management on the grain yield and bread-making quality in winter wheat. J. Cereal Sci. 61: 126-132.

  • Sileshi G. Akinnifesi F.K. Debusho L.K. Beedy T. Ajayi O.C. Mong’omba S. (2010): Variation in maize yield gaps with plant nutrient inputs soil type and climate across sub-Saharan Africa. Field Crops Research 116(1-2): 1-13.

  • Tittonell P. Shepherd K.D. Vanlauwe B. Giller K.E. (2008): Unravelling the effects of soil and crop management on maize productivity in smallholder agricultural systems of western Kenya—an application of classification and regression tree analysis. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 123: 137-150.

  • Topal M. Aksakal V. Bayram B. Yağanoğlu A.M. (2010): An analysis of the factors affecting birth weight and actual milk yield in Swedish red cattle using regression tree analysis. J. Anim. Plant Sci. 20: 63-69.

  • Zhang J. Liu Q. Xu M. Zhao B. (2012): Effects of soil properties and agronomic practices on wheat yield variability in Fengqiu County of North China Plain. African Journal of Agricultural Research 7(11): 1650-1658.

  • Zheng H. Chen L. Han X. Ma Y. Zhao X. (2010): Effectiveness of phosphorus application in improving regional soybean yields under drought stress: A multivariate regression tree analysis. African Journal of Agricultural Research 5(23): 3251-3258.

  • Zheng H. Chen L. Han X. Zhao X. Ma Y. (2009): Classification and regression tree (CART) for analysis of soybean yield variability among fields in Northeast China: the importance of phosphorus application rates under drought conditions. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ 132: 98-105.

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 500 405 9
PDF Downloads 200 128 11