Leg stiffness and potential energy in the countermovement phase and the CMJ jump height

Open access


Study aim: The elastic potential energy accumulated in the musculotendinous units during the countermovement phase of a jump adds up to the energy supplied by the contracting muscles used in the take-off phase. Consequently, the total mechanical energy used during the jump may reach higher values. Stiffness represents a quantitative measure of a body’s elastic properties. Therefore, the aim of this study was to establish the relationship between leg stiffness and the countermovement jump height.

Material and methods: 24 basketball players from the II Division participated in the study. The measurements employed a Kistler force plate and a BTS SMART system for the motion analysis. Each study participant performed three countermovement jumps with arm swings. Leg stiffness in the countermovement phase was determined from the slope of the ground reaction forces curve, with respect to the coexisting height of the greater trochanter of the femur. The decline in the gravitational potential energy of the centre of mass during the countermovement phase is partially accumulated in the form of potential elastic energy through the stretched musculotendinous units, and consequently contributes to the jump height.

Results: We found a statistically significant relationship between leg stiffness and a decline in the potential energy during the countermovement phase. The relationship between leg stiffness and the jump height was not statistically significant.

Conclusions: The distribution of measurements may suggest the presence of local maximums, with their locations representing a value of leg stiffness that allows for high values of changes in the potential energy and the jump height to be obtained. Therefore, the presence of a specific value for leg stiffness that would be the most favourable for the accumulation of potential elastic energy is likely. However, this study cannot unequivocally confirm this fact, and the confirmation of the above statement will require further experimentation.

1. Aboodarda S.J., A. Yusof, N.A.A. Osman, M.W. Thompson, A.H. Mokhtar (2013) Enhanced performance with elastic resistance during the eccentric phase of a countermovement jump. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform., 8(2): 181-187.

2. Anderson F.C., M.G. Pandy (1993) Storage and utilization of elastic strain energy during jumping. J. Biomech., 26(12): 1413-1427. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(93)90092-S.

3. Arampatzis A., F. Schade, M. Walsh, G.-P. Brüggemann (2001) Influence of leg stiffness and its effect on myodynamic jumping performance. J. Electromyogr. Kines., 11(5): 355-364. DOI: 10.1016/S1050-6411(01)00009-8.

4. Bobbert M.F., K.G.M Gerritsen, M.C.A Litjens, A.J. van Soest (1996) Why is countermovement jump height greater than squat jump height? Med. Sci. Sport. Exerc., 28(11): 1402-1412.

5. Brughelli M., J. Cronin (2008) A review of research on the mechanical stiffness in running and jumping: methodology and implications. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sport, 18(4): 417-426. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2008.00769.x.

6. Hanson J.P., M.S. Redfern, M. Mazumdar (1999) Predicting slips and falls considering required and available friction. Ergonomics, 42(12): 1619-1633. DOI: 10.1080/001401399184712.

7. Laffaye G., B.G. Bardy, A. Durey (2005) Leg stiffness and expertise in men jumping. Med. Sci. Sport. Exerc., 37(4): 536-543. DOI: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000158991.17211.13.

8. Laffaye G., M.A. Choukou (2010) Gender bias in the effect of dropping height on jumping performance in volleyball players. J. Strength Cond. Res., 24(8): 2143-2148. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181aeb140.

9. Latash M.L., V.M. Zatsiorsky (1993) Joint stiffness: myth or reality? Hum. Movement Sci., 12(6): 653-692. DOI: 10.1016/0167-9457(93)90010-M.

10. Liu Y., C.-H. Peng, S.-H. Wei, J.-C. Chi, F.-R. Tsai, J.-Y. Chen (2006) Active leg stiffness and energy stored in the muscles during maximal counter movement jump in the aged. J. Electromyogr. Kines., 16(4): 342-351. DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2005.08.001.

11. Lloyd R.S., J.L. Oliver, M.G. Hughes, C.A. Williams (2012) The effects of 4-weeks of plyometric training on reactive strength index and leg stiffness in male youths. J. Strength Cond. Res., 26(10): 2812-2819. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318242d2ec.

12. Pearson S.J., J. McMahon (2012) Lower limb mechanical properties: determining factors and implications for performance. Sports Med., 42(11): 929-940. DOI: 10.1007/BF03262304.

13. Rabita G., A. Couturier, D. Lambertz (2008) Influence of training background on the relationships between plantarflexor intrinsic stiffness and overall musculoskeletal stiffness during hopping. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol., 103(2): 163-171. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-008-0679-9.

14. Serpell B.G., N.B. Ball, J.M. Scarvell, P.N. Smith (2012) A review of models of vertical, leg, and knee stiffness in adults for running, jumping or hopping tasks. J. Sport. Sci., 30(13): 1347-1363. DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2012.710755.

15. Struzik A., J. Zawadzki (2013) Leg stiffness during phases of countermovement and take-off in vertical jump. Acta Bioeng. Biomech., 15(2): 113-118. DOI: 10.5277/abb130213.

16. Struzik A., J. Zawadzki (2016) Application of force-length curve for determination of leg stiffness during a vertical jump. Acta Bioeng. Biomech., 18(2). DOI: 10.5277/ABB-00401-2015-02.

17. Taube W., C. Leukel, A. Gollhofer (2012) How neurons make us jump: the neural control of stretch-shortening cycle movements. Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev., 40(2): 106-115. DOI: 10.1097/JES.0b013e31824138da.

18. Wang L. (2008) The kinetics and stiffness characteristics of the lower extremity in older adults during vertical jumping. J. Sport. Sci. Med., 7(3): 379-386.

19. Wilson G.J., B.C. Elliott, G.A. Wood (1991) The effect on performance of imposing a delay during a stretch-shorten cycle movement. Med. Sci. Sport. Exerc., 23(3): 364-370.

Biomedical Human Kinetics

The Journal of University of Physical Education, Warsaw

Journal Information

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.123

Cited By


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 299 280 28
PDF Downloads 103 93 14