Study aim: the aim of the study was to compare two methods for measuring punching and kicking force and the reaction time of athletes.
Material and methods: both systems were designed to measure and to analyse the mechanical characteristics of punches and strikes delivered by upper and lower limbs to a punching bag. The main difference between both punching bags was the way in which the delivered force was measured. The first method used strain gauges while the second method used accelerometer technology. Both systems consisted of a punching bag with software, attached signal diodes, and either embedded accelerometers or strain gauges. The bags were of different sizes. Acceleration transducers and gyroscopes or strain gauges were placed inside the punching bags, which allowed for measuring dynamics while the bag was struck. The software calculated strike force, the point of force application and its direction, and reaction time. Both systems were tested.
Results: the results of the accelerometer-based method show that the mean relative error of force calculation amounts to 3%. The measurement error of acceleration is less than 1%. The mean relative measurement error of the striking surface on the punching bag is 2%. However, the measurement error of force recorded with the strain gauge-based method is less than 1%. The results show that both systems are similar.
Conclusions: the punching bag having an embedded accelerometer is equipped with more versatile software, which makes the system a good tool for practical application in combat sport training.
1. Balius X. (1993) Cinemática y Dinámica de las cinco técnicas más frecuentes. Taekwondo, 13. Comité Olımpico Espanol, Madrid.
2. Čepulėnas A., V. Bružas, P. Mockus, V. Subačius (2011) Impact of physical training mesocycle on athletic and specific fitness of elite boxers. Archives of Budo, 7(1): 33-39.
3. Conkel B.S., J. Braucht, W. Wilson, W. Pieter, D. Taaffe, S.J. Fleck (1988) Isokinetic torque, kick velocity and force in Taekwondo. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., 20(2): S5.
4. Falco C., O. Alvarez, I. Castillo, I. Estevan, J. Martos, F. Mugarra, A. Iradi (2009) Influence of the distance in a roundhouse kick’s execution time and impact force in Taekwondo. J. Biomech., 42(3): 242-248.
5. Guidetti L., A. Musulin, C. Baldari (2002) Physiological factors in middleweight boxing performance. J. Sports Phys. Fitness, 42(3): 309-314.
6. Karpiłowski B., Z. Nosarzewski, Z. Staniak (1994) A versatile boxing simulator. Biol. Sport, 11(2): 133-139.
7. Karpiłowski B., Z. Staniak, Z. Nosarzewski, C. Ptak (1997) Kontrola realizacji zadań treningowych przy pomocy trenażera bokserskiego, [Control of training task by means of a boxing simulator]. Trening, 2: 159-164.
8. Li Y., F. Yan, Y. Zeng, G. Wang (2005) Biomechanical analysis on roundhouse kick in taekwondo. In: Proceedings of the 23th International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports. Beijing, China, pp. 391-394.
9. Nien Y.H., L.R. Chuang, P.H. Chung (2004) The design of force and action time measuring device for martial arts. International Sport Engineering Association, 2: 139-144.
10. Pędzich W., A. Mastalerz, C. Urbanik (2006). � � The comparison of the dynamics of selected leg strokes in taekwondo WTF. Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics, 8(1): 83-90.
11. Pieter F., W. Pieter (1995) Speed and force in selected taekwondo techniques. Biol. Sport, 12: 257-266.
12. Ramazanoglu N. (2013) Transmission of impact through the electronic body protector in taekwondo. International Journal of Applied, 3.2.
13. Smith M.S., R.J. Dyson, T. Hale, L. Janaway (2000) Development of a boxing dynamometer and its punch force discrimination efficacy. J. Sports Sci., 18(6): 445-450.
14. Waliko T.J. (2005) Biomechanics of the head for Olympic boxer punches to the face. Br. J. Sports Med., 39: 710-719. DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.2004.014126.