Ancient American Board Games, I: From Teotihuacan to the Great Plains

Open access

Abstract

Besides the ubiquitous patolli—a race game played on a cruciform gameboard—the Aztecs had obviously a few other board games. Unfortunately their names have not been recorded. We owe to Diego Durán, writing in the last quarter of the 16th century from local sources, some hints of what appears to be a “war game” and a second, different race game that he calls ‘fortuna’. A close examination of some Precolumbian codices shows a rectangular design with a chequered border, together with beans and gamepieces, which has correctly been interpreted as a board game. Many similar diagrams can be seen carved on stone in temples and public places, from Teotihuacan (c. 4th-7th century AD) to late Toltec times (9th-12th century AD). Of this game too we do not know the name. It has tentatively been called quauhpatolli (“eagle- or wooden-patolli”) by Christian Duverger (1978)—although this seems to have been the classic post-conquest Nahuatl name for the game of chess—or “proto-patolli”, and more concretely “rectángulo de cintas” (rectangle of bands) by William Swezey and Bente Bittman (1983).

The lack of any representation of this game in all Postcolumbian codices, as painted by Aztec artists commissioned by Spanish scholars interested in the Aztec culture, is clear indication that the game had disappeared before the Spanish conquest, at least in central Mexico. No Aztec site shows any such gameboard. Fortunately this game had survived until the 20th (and 21st!) century but located in the Tarascan country, now the state of Michoacán. It was discovered, unchanged, in a Tarascan (Purepecha) village by Ralph L. Beals and Pedro Carrasco, who published their find in 1944. At that time Beals and Carrasco had no idea the game was attested in early codices and Teotihuacan to Maya and Toltec archaeological sites. In Purepecha the game is called k’uillichi.

There is evidence of an evolution that led to a simplification of the game: less tracks, less gamesmen (in fact only one per player, while k’uillichi has four), and less ‘dice’. From a “complex” race game, the new debased version turned to be a simple single-track race game with no strategy at all. It is possible that this process took place in Michoacán. (A few examples of the simplified game were found in some Tarascan villages.) Also it seems the widespread use of the Nahua language, which the Spanish promoted, led to calling the game, and/or its dice, patol. As it was, patol proved to be very appealing and became very popular in the Mexican West, finally reaching the Noroeste, that is, the present North-West of Mexico and Southwest of the United States.

This seems to have been a recent trend, since its progress was observed with much detail by missionaries living in close contact with the Indians along what was called the ‘Camino Real’, the long highway that led from western Mexico to what is now New Mexico in the U.S. The Spanish themselves seem to have helped the game in its diffusion, unaware of its presence. It is clearly with the Spaniards that the patol game, sometimes also called quince (fifteen), reached the American Southwest and settled in the Pueblo and the Zuñi countries.

It is there that some newcomers, coming from the North or from the Great Plains, and getting in contact with the Pueblos in the 18th century, found the game and took it over. The Kiowas and Kiowa Apaches are noted for their zohn ahl (or tsoñä) game, while the Arapahos call it ne’bäku’thana. A careful examination of zohn ahl shows that it has kept the basic features of an ancient game that came—in Spanish times—from Mexico and may have been popular in Teotihuacan times. Its spread northward—through the Tarascan country—is, hopefully, well documented.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Acuña R. (1987). Relaciones geográficas del siglo xvi. v. 10. Mexico City Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

  • Beals R. L. (1933). The Acaxee: a mountain tribe of Durango and Sinaloa. Ibero-Americana 6. Berkeley University of California Press.

  • Beals R. L. (1943). The aboriginal culture of the Cáhita Indians. Ibero-Americana 19. Berkeley University of California Press.

  • Beals R. L. and P. Carrasco (1944). “Games of the mountain Tarascans”. In: American Anthropologist 46 pp. 516–522.

  • Bennett W. C. and Zingg R. M. (1986). Los Tarahumaras: una tribu india del norte de México. Spanish translation of Bennett and Zingg 1935. Mexico City Instituto Nacional Indigenista.

  • Bennett W. C. and R. M. Zingg (1935). The Tarahumara: an Indian tribe of northern Mexico. Reprint Glorieta NM Rio Grande Press 1976. Chicago University of Chicago Press.

  • Cabrera Torres J. J. and S. Pulido Méndez (2005). “El kuilichi prehispánico y sus reminiscencias actuales. Un juego de destreza entre los indígenas de Michoacán”. In: Arqueología (Mexico City) 35 pp. 138–147.

  • Culin S. (1896). “Chess and Playing-cards”. In: Annual Report of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution … for the year ending June 30 1896 (= Report of the U.S. National Museum) vol. ii 1898 pp. 665–942. Reprint New York 1976.

  • Culin S. (1907). Games of the North American Indians. Washington D.C. (24th Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology 1902–1903). Reprint New York 1975; 1986.

  • de Voogt A. A.-E. Dunn-Vaturi and J. W. Eerkens (2013). “Cultural transmission in the Ancient Near East: twenty squares and fifty-eight holes”. In: Journal of Archaeological Science 40.4 pp. 1715–1730.

  • Duverger C. (1978). L’esprit du jeu chez les Aztèques. Civilisations et sociétés. Paris-La Haye-New York Mouton.

  • Gallegos Gómora M. J. (1994). “Un patolli prehispánico en Calakmul Campeche”. In: Revista española de antropologia americana 24 pp. 9–24.

  • Gilberti M. (2004). Arte de la lengua de Michuacán compilada por el muy reverendo Padre fray Maturino Gilberti. ed. C. Monzón. Zamora El Colegio de Michoacán.

  • Gorenstein S. S. (1996). “Western and Northwestern Mexico”. In: The Cambridge History of the Native Peoples of the Americas II : Mesoamerica Pt. 1. Ed. by Adams R. E. W. and McLeod M. J. Cambridge University Press pp. 318–357.

  • Jerónimo de Alcalá (1970). The Chronicles of Michoacan. English version of Jerónimo de Alcalá 1988. University of Oklahoma Press.

  • Jerónimo de Alcalá (1988). La relación de Michoacán; versión paleográfica estudio preliminar y notas del doctor Francisco Miranda. Zamora El Colegio de Michoacán.

  • Kendall T. (1980). Patolli: A Game of Ancient Mexico. Newton MA Kirk Game.

  • Kirchhoff P. (1954). “Gatherers and farmers in the Greater Southwest: a problem in classification”. In: American Anthropologist (Special Southwest Issue) 56 pp. 529–550.

  • Kroeber A. (1939). Cultural and Natural Areas of Native North America. Berkeley University of California Press.

  • López Batista R. (1992). “Romayá: un juego tarahumara el ‘15’”. In: Nuestra Palabra (suppl. to El Nacional) 3rd year. 1 pp. 11–12.

  • Meadows W. C. (2008). Kiowa Ethnogeography. Austin University of Texas Press.

  • Mountjoy J. (2006). “Algunos patollis abreviados encontrados entre los petrograbados de Jalisco”. In: Los petroglifos del Norte de México : memoria del Primer Seminario de Petrograbados del Norte de México. Ed. by V. J. S. Ramírez and R. V. Valverdú. Mexico City Instituto Nacional de Antropologia e Historia pp. 151–155.

  • Mountjoy J. B. and J. P. Smith (1985). “An archaeological patolli from Tomatlán Jalisco Mexico”. In: Contributions to the archaeology and ethnohistory of Greater Mesoamerica: Essays in honor of Carroll L. Riley. Ed. by W. Folan. 240–262. Reprinted in: M.P. Casado López L. Mirambell Silva (eds.) El arte rupestre en México : ensayos 1990–2004. Mexico City INAH 2005: 395–411.

  • Murray H. (1952). A history of board games other than chess. Oxford Oxford University Press. Reprint New York 1978; Oxford 2002.

  • Olmos Curiel A. G. (2010). “Los petrograbados de Tzintzuntzan Michoacán : un sistema de comunicación gráfica”. 4.5 El K’uilichi ch’anakua en Tzintzuntzan : cosmograma mesoamericano 116–125. MA thesis. El Colegio de Michoacán.

  • Ortega Rangel J. R. (n.d.). Ch’anakua tembini ka iumu: el juego del quince o los palillos. Morelia Mich. Universidad Pedagógica Nacional. (accessed 17/02/2006 no longer online). url: http://redderedes.upn.mx/2areunion/patriciaserna.htm.

  • Pennington C. W. (ed.) (1981). Arte y vocabulario de la lengua dohema heve o eudeva (anónimo siglo xvii). Mexico City Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

  • Pennington C. W. (1963). The Tarahumar of Mexico: Their Environment and Material Culture. Utah University of Utah Press.

  • Pennington C. W. (1969). The Tepehuan of Chihuahua: Their Material Culture. Utah University of Utah Press.

  • Pérez de Ribas A. (1645). Historia de los triumphos de nuestra santa Fe entre gentes las más bárbaras. Triunfos de nuestra santa fe entre gentes las mas barbaras y fierasdel nuevo orbe: Por el padre Andres Perez de Ribas. Madrid.

  • Riley C. L. (1995). Rio Del Norte: People of the Upper Rio Grande from Earliest Times to the Pueblo Revolt. Salt Lake City University of Utah Press.

  • Scholes F. V. (1935). “The first decades of the Inquisition in New Mexico”. In: New Mexico Historical Review x pp. 195–241.

  • Smith A. L. (1977). “Patolli at the ruins of Seibal Petén Guatemala”. In: Social process in Maya prehistory. Studies in honour of Sir Eric Thompson. Ed. by N. Hammond. London-New York-San Francisco Academic Press pp. 349–363.

  • Smith W. N. (1945). “The Papago game of “Gince goot”“. In: The Masterkey xix.6 pp. 194–197.

  • Soto Bravo V. (1992). “K’uilichi : P’urhecheri tua anapu ch’anakua. Juego ancestral purépecha”. In: Nuestra Palabra (suppl. to El Nacional) 3rd year. 1 pp. 3–7.

  • Spier L. (1928). Havasupai Ethnography. xxix pt. iii. New York Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History.

  • Spier L. (1933). Yuman tribes of the Gila River. Chicago University of Chicago Press. Reprint New York 1978.

  • Steffel M. (1791). “Tarahumarisches Wörterbuch”. In: Nachrichten von verschiedenen Ländern des spanischen Amerika. Ed. by C. von Murr. Halle 1809.

  • Swezey W. and B. Bittman (1983). “El rectángulo de cintas y el patolli: nueva evidencia de la antigüedad distribución variedad y formas de practicar este juego precolombino”. In: Mesoamérica iv.6 pp. 373–416.

  • Williamson R. (1996). “Excavations interpretations and implications of the earliest structures beneath structure 10L-26 at Copan Honduras”. In: Eighth Palenque Round Table. Ed. by M. J. Macri and J. McHargue. San Francisco 1993 electronic version 1996 Pre-Columbian Art Research Institute.

Search
Journal information
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 850 417 19
PDF Downloads 737 395 42