Analysis of Factors Affecting Thermal Comfort Properties of Woven Compression Bandages

Open access

Abstract

Compression bandage (CB) as a porous material should provide both graduated pressure and thermal comfort properties to enable air permeability, heat transfer, and liquid perspiration out of the human body. The main factors affecting thermal comfort properties are the temperature difference between environment and skin, yarns’ structure and material, fabric thickness, porosity, areal density, number of fabric layers, trapped air, and fabric structure. Thermal resistance (Rct) and water vapor resistance (Ret) are evaluated for four types of woven CBs. All bandage types were applied at the range of extension (10–80%) using both two- and three-layer bandaging on thermal foot model (TFM). Rct values are compared with measured results by the Alambeta instrument, whereas Ret test is performed on the Permetest device. Thermal resistance is significantly decreased when increasing the bandage extension from 10 to 40%, then it is slightly increased by increasing the extension from 40 to 60%, after that it is decreased especially at 80% extension due to lower bandage thickness and higher compression.

[1] Utkun, E. (2015). A research on various comfort properties of interlock knitted fabrics. Industria Textila, 66(1).

[2] Huang, J. (2016). Review of heat and water vapor transfer through multilayer fabrics. Textile Research Journal, 86(3), 325-336

[3] Ghosh, A., Mal, P., Majumdar, A., Banerjee, D. (2017). An investigation on air and thermal transmission through knitted fabric structures using the Taguchi method. Autex Research Journal, 17(2), 152-163. DOI: 10.1515/aut-2016-0009.

[4] Qian, X., Fan, J. (2009). A quasi-physical model for predicting the thermal insulation and moisture vapour resistance of clothing. Applied Ergonomics, 40(4), 577-590.

[5] Salopek, C. I., Skenderi, Z. (2010). Approach to the prediction of thermophysiological comfort, Chapter 09 in DAAAM International Scientific Book 2010, pp. 081-088, B. Katalinic (Ed.). DOI: 10.2507/daaam.scibook.2010.09.

[6] Bizjak M., Gorjanc D. (2014). The influence of increased elasticity on resistance of cotton fabrics. XIIIth International Izmir Textile and Apparel, April 2-5

[7] Çolak, S. M., et al. (2016). Thermophysiological comfort properties of the leathers processed with different tanning agents. Journal of Textile and Apparel/Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon, 26(4), 436-443.

[8] Nelson, E. A., Hillman, A., Thomas, K. (2014). Intermittent pneumatic compression for treating venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (5). Art. No.: CD001899. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001899.pub4.

[9] Agale, S. V. (2013). Chronic leg ulcers: epidemiology, aetiopathogenesis, and management. Ulcers, Hindawi Publishing Corporation, 2013 Ulcers, Article ID 413604. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/413604.

[10] Abdel-Rehim, Z. S., Saad, M. M., El-Shakankery, M., Hanafy, I. (2006). Textile fabrics as thermal insulators. AUTEX Research Journal, 6(3), 148-161.

[11] Bairagi S., et al. (2016). Study on potential application of natural fibre made fabrics as thermal insulation medium, American International Journal of Research in Science, 16-203.

[12] Nilsson, H., Holmér, I. (2000). Proceedings of the Third International Meeting on Thermal Manikin Testing, 3IMM, at the National Institute for Working Life, October 12-13, 1999. www.niwl.se/ah/nr2000:4.

[13] O’Callaghan, P. W., Probert, S. D. (1977). Thermal resistance behaviour of single and multiple layers of clothing fabrics under mechanical load. Applied Energy, 3(1), 3-12.

[14] Karunamoorthy S., Das A. (2014). Study on thermal resistance of multilayered fabrics under different compressional loads. The Journal of The Textile Institute, 105(5), 538-546.

[15] Srdjak, M., Skenderi, Z., Cubric, I. S. (2009). Water vapor resistance of knitted fabrics under different environmental conditions. Fibres and Textiles in Eastern Europe, 17(2), 72-75.

[16] Kotb, N. A., et al. (2011). Quality of summer knitted fabrics produced from microfiber/cotton yarns. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 1(12), 3416-3423.

[17] Ramachandran, T., Manomani, G., Vigneswaran, C., (2010). Thermal behavior of ring – and compact – spun yarn single jersey, rib and interlock knitted fabrics. Indian Journal of Fibre and Textile Research, 35, 250-257.

[18] Oğlakcioğlu, N., Marmarali, A. (2007). Thermal comfort properties of some knitted structures. Fibres and Textiles in Eastern Europe, 15(5-6), 64-65.

[19] Hes, L., (1987). Thermal Properties of Nonwovens. Proceedings of Congress Index 87, Geneva.

[20] Chidambaram, P., Govind, R., Venkataraman, K. C., (2011). The effect of loop length and yarn linear density on the thermal properties of bamboo knitted fabric. AUTEX Research Journal, 11(4), 102-105.

[21] Ogulata, R. T., Mavruz, S. (2010). Investigation of porosity and air permeability values of plain knitted fabrics. Fibres and Textiles in Eastern Europe, 18, 71-75.

[22] Onofrei, E., Rocha, A. M., Catarino, A. (2011). The influence of knitted fabrics’ structure on the thermal and moisture management properties. Journal of Engineered Fibres and Fabrics, 6(4), 10-22.

[23] Ramakrishnan, G., Dhurai, B., Mukhopadhyay, S. (2009). An investigation into the properties of knitted fabrics made from viscose microfibres. Journal of Textile and Apparel, Technology and Management, 6(1), 1-9.

[24] Cubric, I. S., Skenderi, Z., et al. (2012). Experimental study of thermal resistance of knitted fabrics. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 38, 223-228.

[25] Foot Manikin Technical Specification for model FM 005-08, Version 1.0, March 2010, UCS d.o.o., Slovenia.

[26] Mekjavic, I. B., et al. (2005). Static and dynamic evaluation of biophysical properties of footwear: the Jozef Stefan institute sweating thermal foot manikin system. In Prevention of Cold Injuries (pp. 6-1 – 6-8). Meeting Proceedings RTO-MP-HFM-126, Paper 6.

[27] SENSORA INSTRUMENTS & CONSULTING, REG. No. 183 306 81, VAT No. CZ440128092 Na Výbezku 312, 460 15 LIBEREC, Czech Republic. http://www.sensora.eu/PermetestManual09.pdf.

[28] Bogusławska-Bączek, M., Hes, L. (2013). Effective water vapour permeability of wet wool fabric and blended fabrics. Fibres and Textiles in Eastern Europe.

[29] Hes L. (2008). Non-destructive determination of comfort parameters during marketing of functional garments and clothing. Indian Journal of Fibre and Textile Research, 33, 239-245.

[30] Hes L. Catalogues of the ALAMBETA and PERMETEST instruments, SENSORA Co. (Czech Republic).

[31] Havlová M. (2014). Model of vertical porosity occurring in woven fabrics and its effect on air permeability. Fibres and Textiles in Eastern Europe, 22, 58-63.

[32] ASTM D737:96. Standard Test Method for Air Permeability of Textile Fabrics.

[33] Bhattacharjee, D., Kothari, V. K. (2008). Prediction of thermal resistance of woven fabrics. Part II: heat transfer in natural and forced convective environments. Journal of the Textile Institute, 99(5), 433-449.

[34] Mao, N., Russell, S. J. (2007). The thermal insulation properties of spacer fabrics with a mechanically integrated wool fiber surface. Textile Research Journal, 77(12), 914-922.

[35] Gokarneshan, N. (2018). Some significant developments in bandage fabrics. Journal of Nursing and Patient Health Care, 1(1), 105.

[36] Kumar, B., Das, A., Alagirusamy, R. (2014). Effect of material and structure of compression bandage on interface pressure variation over time. Phlebology, 29(6), 376-385.

[37] Ding, D., Tang, T., Song, G., McDonald, A. (2011). Characterizing the performance of a single-layer fabric system through a heat and mass transfer model-Part II: thermal and evaporative resistances. Textile Research Journal, 81(9), 945-958.

[38] Oğlakcioğlu, N., Marmarali, A. (2007). Thermal comfort properties of some knitted structures. Fibres and Textiles in Eastern Europe, 15(5–6), 64-65.

Autex Research Journal

The Journal of Association of Universities for Textiles (AUTEX)

Journal Information


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.927
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1,016

CiteScore 2018: 1.21

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.395
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 1.044

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 89 89 12
PDF Downloads 49 49 6