Influence of Tensile Stress on Woven Compression Bandage Structure and Porosity

Open access


Woven compression bandage (CB) is one of the elastic textiles that exert pressure on muscles. With a defined tensile strength, it is possible to create the required compression on the given body parts. This work aims to investigate the relationship between woven fabric deformation, porosity, and tensile stress properties of three main types of woven CBs. All bandage samples are applied on human leg using two- and three-layer bandaging techniques. Bandage porosity is calculated for all frames at different weave angles using NIS software. Woven bandage construction parameters which are given by the preparation of warp and weft yarns, twist, count, and density along with woven fabric weave, type of weaving, and finishing process are the main factors that influence the bandage properties. Several methods considering thread distributions have been developed to determine the woven fabric’s porosity during the tensile stress. Experimental results confirm that bandage porosity is directly proportional to the bandage extension and weave angle that ranges from 44° to 90°. The novelty of candidate study is to introduce practical remarks to the patient for optimizing the required bandage pressure by suitable extension or applied tension or weave angle for two- and three-layer bandaging systems.

[1] Roaldsen, K. S., Elfving, B., Stanghelle, J. K., Mattsson, E. (2012). Effect of multilayer high-compression bandaging on ankle range of motion and oxygen cost of walking. Phlebology, 27(1), 5-12.

[2] Elnashar, E. A. (2005). Volume porosity and permeability in double-layer woven fabrics. AUTEX Research Journal, 5(4), 207-217.

[3] Lawrence, M., Jiang, Y. (2017). Porosity, pore size distribution, micro-structure. In Bio-aggregates Based Building Materials (pp. 39-71). Springer (Dordrecht).

[4] Neckář B., Das, D. (2012). Theory of structure and mechanics of fibrous assemblies (1st ed.). Woodhead Publishing (India).

[5] Nelson E. A., Hillman A., Thomas K. (2014). Intermittent pneumatic compression for treating venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (5). DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD001899.pub4.

[6] Agale, S. V. (2013). Chronic leg ulcers: epidemiology, aetiopathogenesis, and management. Ulcers.

[7] Fletcher, J., et al. (2013). Principles of compression in venous disease: a practitioner’s guide to treatment and prevention of venous leg ulcers. Wounds International. Available:

[8] Halfaoui, R., Chemani, B. (2016). New approach to predict pressure produced by elastic textile in the therapeutic treatment of venous leg. Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, 8(2), 297-312.

[9] Al Khaburi, J., Dehghani-Sanij, A. A., Nelson, E. A., Hutchinson, J. (2012). Effect of bandage thickness on interface pressure applied by compression bandages. Medical Engineering and Physics, 34(3), 378-385.

[10] Cay, A., Atrav, R., Duran, K. (2007). Effects of warp-weft density variation and fabric porosity of the cotton fabrics on their colour in reactive dyeing. Fibres and Textiles in Eastern Europe, 1(60), 91-94.

[11] Rashid, A., Hani, A. (2013). Analysis of woven natural fiber fabrics prepared using self-designed handloom. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering. DOI: 10.15282/ijame.8.2013.10.0098.

[12] Gooijer. H. (1998). Flow resistance of textile materials.

[13] Szosland, J., Babska, A., Gasiorowska, E. (1999). Airpenetrability of woven multi-layer composite textiles. Fibres and Textiles in Eastern Europe, 7(1), 34-37.

[14] Gee, N. C. (1953). Cloth setting and setting theories. Textile Manu, 80, 381-384.

[15] Peirce, F. T., Womersley, J. R. (1978). Cloth Geometry. Textile Institute (Manchester, England).

[16] Love, L. (1954). Graphical relationships in cloth geometry for plain, twill, and sateen weaves. Textile Research Journal, 24(12), 1073-1083.

[17] Kemp A. (1958). An extension of pierce’s cloth geometry to the treatment of non-circular threads. Journal of the Textile Institute Transactions, 49, 44-49.

[18] Hamilton J.B. (1964). A general system of woven-fabric geometry. Journal of the Textile Institute Transactions, 55, 66-82.

[19] Weiner, L. (1971). Textile fabric design tables, Technomic (Stamford, USA).

[20] Seyam, A., El-Shiekh, A. (1993). Mechanics of woven fabrics: Part III: critical review of weaveability limit studies. Textile Research Journal, 63(7), 371-378.

[21] Valencia, I. C., Falabella, A., Kirsner, R. S., Eaglstein, W. H. (2001). Chronic venous insufficiency and venous leg ulceration. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 44(3), 401-424.

[22] Aboalasaad, A. R. R., Sirková, B. K. (2018). Analysis and prediction of woven compression bandages properties. The Journal of The Textile Institute, 1-7.

[23] ISO 13934-1:1999(E): Textiles -Tensile properties of fabrics- Part 1: Determination of maximum force and elongation at maximum force using the strip method.

[24] Schuren, J., Mohr, K. (2008). The efficacy of Laplace’s equation in calculating bandage pressure in venous leg ulcers. Wounds UK, 4(2), 38-47.

[25] Siddique, H. F., et al. (2018). Development of V-shaped compression socks on conventional socks knitting machine. Autex Research Journal. DOI:

[26] Rimaud, D., Convert, R., Calmels, P. (2014). In vivo measurement of compression bandage interface pressures: the first study. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 57(6-7), 394-408. Doi:10.1016/

[27] Sirková, B. K., Mertová, I. (2013). Prediction of woven fabric properties using software ProTkaTex. Autex Research Journal, 13(1), 11-16.

[28] Khaburi, J. A., Dehghani-Sanij, A. A., Nelson, A., Hutchinson, J. (2011). The effect of multi-layer bandage on the interface pressure applied by compression bandages. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 5(6), 1169-1174.

[29] Chassagne, F., Molimard, J., Convert, R., Giraux, P., Badel, P. (2018). Numerical model reduction for the prediction of interface pressure applied by compression bandages on the lower leg. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 65(2), 449-457.

Autex Research Journal

The Journal of Association of Universities for Textiles (AUTEX)

Journal Information

IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.927
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1,016

CiteScore 2018: 1.21

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.395
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 1.044


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 93 93 27
PDF Downloads 54 54 12