Parameterization of Seersucker Woven Fabrics Using Laser Techniques

Open access

Abstract

Seersucker woven fabrics are increasingly used in the textile industry. Unfortunately, their popularity is limited due to the lack of standards and parameterization of their structure. Thus, the designer of the finished product (clothing, bedding, or decorative items) has problems with ordering a fabric with a specific structure and properties. In this context, it is necessary to parameterize them. This paper presents a method for measuring the surface geometry of seersucker woven fabrics using laser techniques. The surface geometry of the seersucker woven fabric was determined using adapted roughness parameters, such as Wz, Ra, and Rz, as well as by using a hypsometric map.

[1] Badawi, S. S. (2007). Development of the weaving machine and 3D woven spacer fabric structures for lightweight composites materials. PhD Thesis, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.

[2] Unal, P. G. (2012). 3D woven fabrics. In: Jeon, H. Y. (Ed.). Woven fabrics. Rijeka, InTech 91-120.

[3] Matusiak, M., Sikorski, K., Wilk, E. (2012). Innovative woven fabrics for therapeutic clothing. In: Bartkowiak, G., Frydrych, I., Pawłowa, M. (Eds.), Innovations in textile materials & protective clothing. Warsaw, CIOP-PIB,. 89-106.

[4] Gandhi, K. (2012). Woven textiles principles, technologies and applications. (1st ed.). New Delhi, Woodhead Publishing, pp.142-158.

[5] Maqsooda, M., Nawaba, Y., Javaida, M. U., Shakera, K., Umaira, M. (2014). Development of seersucker fabrics using single warp beam and modelling of their stretchrecovery behavior. The Journal of the Textile Institute, 106(11), 1154-1160. DOI: 10.1081/00405000.2014.977542 2014.

[6] Militky, J. (2012). Woven fabrics surface quantification. In: Jeon, H. Y. (Ed.). Woven fabrics, InTech, pp. 121-154. ISBN 978-953-51-0607-4.

[7] Militky, J., Bajzik, V. (2002). Surface roughness and fractal dimension. Journal of Textile Institute, 92, 1-24.

[8] Militký, J., Mazal, M. (2007). Image analysis method of surface roughness evaluation. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, 19, 186-193.

[9] Park, K. H., Kwon, Y. H., Oh, K. W. (2003). The surface roughness measurement for textiles fabrics by a noncontact method for tactile perception. 6th Asian Design International Conference.

[10] Mohri, M., Hosseini Ravandi, S. A., Youssefi, M. (2005). Objective evaluation of wrinkled fabric using radon transform. Journal of Textile Institute, 96(6), 365-370.

[11] Semnani, D., Hasani, H., Behtaj, S., Ghorbani, E. (2011). Surface roughness measurement of weft knitted fabrics using image processing. Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe, 19, 3(86), 55-59.

[12] Modrak, J. (2012). Evaluation of change in structure of nanofibre membrane surface during washing cycles. Degree thesis, Technical University of Liberec.

[13] Vik, M., Vikova, M. (2014). Surface topography of textile braille labelling. Proceedings of the 7th International Textile, Clothing & Design Conference - Magic World of Textiles, Dubrovnik Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270957631_Surface_Topography_of_Textile_Braille_Labelling [accessed Aug 07, 2018].

[14] Mooneghi, S. A., Saharkhiz, S., Varkiani, S. M. H. (2014). Surface roughness evaluation of textile fabrics: A literature review, Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics, 9(2), 1-18.

[15] Matusiak, M., Fracczak, L. (2018). Investigation of 3D woven fabric topography using laser-scanning. Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe, 26, 1(127), 81-88. DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0010.7801.

[16] Matusiak, M., Fracczak, L. (2017). Comfort-related properties of seersucker fabrics in dry and wet state, International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, 29(3), 366-379.

[17] Matusiak, M., Fracczak, L. (2016). Influence of kind of weft yarn on properties of the seersucker woven fabrics. Autex Research Journal, 16(4), 214-221.

Autex Research Journal

The Journal of Association of Universities for Textiles (AUTEX)

Journal Information


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.957
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.027

CiteScore 2017: 1.18

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.448
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 1.465

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 55 55 22
PDF Downloads 38 38 8