A Comparative Study on Fabric Efficiencies for Different Human Body Shapes in the Apparel Industry

Open access

Abstract

In the apparel manufacturing, fabric utilization always remains the significant apprehensions in controlling the production expenditure. Alteration in pattern shapes and marker preparation leads to the enormous utilization of fabric. The purpose of this research is to study fabric efficiency in correspondence with four different human body shapes in both genders. Two clothing styles, fitted trousers and fitted shirts, were processed conventionally in the garment manufacturing company. The comparative study of auto-marker and manual-marker making through Garment Gerber Technology (GGT) software were also accomplished. The evaluation of fabric consumptions, marker efficiency, marker loss, fabric loss, and fabric cost relevant to four different body shapes was analyzed for both women and men. The investigation carried out in this article concludes that there are differences in fabric consumptions, efficiencies, and cost-effectiveness relative to body shapes. The result revealed that the manualmarker of trousers for triangular body shape in women’s wears has the least fabric consumption (most cost-effective), whereas the shirt’s auto-marker for an oval body shape in men’s wears has the most fabric utilization (least costeffective). The manual-virtual-marker making is efficient (significant p-value) than auto-generated-markers. Also, fabric utilization for women’s garments is cost-effective than that for men. Trousers are cost-effective compared to the shirts.

[1] Soiinger, J., 1988. Apparel Manufacturing Handbook— Analysis, Principles and Practice, Bobbin Blenheim, Columbia. SC, USA, pp. 3-5.

[2] Tung, Chun and Hung, Solving Cutting Scheduling Problem by Simulated Annealing Search Method, IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM). 2016.

[3] Wong, W.K. and S.Y.S. Leung, A Hybrid Planning Process for Improving Fabric Utilization. Textile Research Journal, 2009. 79(18): p. 1680-1695.

[4] Milenkovic, V.J., Rotational polygon overlap minimization and compaction. Computational Geometry, 1998. 10(4): p. 305-318.

[5] Wong, W.K. and S.Y.S. Leung, Genetic optimization of fabric utilization in apparel manufacturing. International Journal of Production Economics, 2008. 114(1): p. 376-387.

[6] Hallah and Bouziri, Heuristics for the combined cut order planning two-dimensional layout problem in the apparel industry, International Transactions in Operational Research, 2016 (23): p. 321-353.

[7] Chung, M.-J., H.-F. Lin, and M.-J.J. Wang, The development of sizing systems for Taiwanese elementaryand high-school students. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2007. 37(8): p. 707-716.

[8] Hsu, C.-H., Data mining to improve industrial standards and enhance production and marketing: An empirical study in the apparel industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009. 36(3): p. 4185-4191.

[9] Wong, W.K. and S.Y.S. Leung, A Hybrid Planning Process for Improving Fabric Utilization. Textile Research Journal, 2009. 79(18): p. 1680-1695.

[10] Nada, Y.A. and H. Meshref, Analysis, Design, and Implementation of Intelligent Expert System for Clothes Style Selection. Analysis, 2014. 105(4).

[11] Choi, Y.L. and Y.J. Nam, Classification of upper lateral body shapes for the apparel industry. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 2010. 20(5): p. 378-390.

[12] Allen, B., B. Curless, and Z. Popović. The space of human body shapes: reconstruction and parameterization from range scans. in ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG). 2003. ACM.

[13] Alexander, M., L. Jo Connell, and A. Beth Presley, Clothing fit preferences of young female adult consumers. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, 2005. 17(1): p. 52-64

[14] Otieno, R., G. Pisut, and L. Jo Connell, Fit preferences of female consumers in the USA. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 2007. 11(3): p. 366-379.

[15] Wong, W., Optimisation of apparel manufacturing resource allocation using a generic optimised table-planning model. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2003. 21(12): p. 935-944.

[16] Agbo, D.A. and V. IGOLI, Body Size and Shape Categorization of some Ethnique Groups in Benue State Using Waist, Bust, and Hip Measurements. International Journal of Scientific Research in Information Systems and Engineering, 2015. 1(1): p. 29-36.

[17] Simmons, K., C. Istook, and P. Devarajan, Female figure identification technique (FFIT) for apparel. Part I: Describing female shapes. Journal of Textile and Apparel, Technology and Management, 2004. 4(1): p. 1-16.

[18] Simmons, K. and C.L. Istook, Female Figure Identification Technique (FFIT) for apparel part II: Development of shape sorting software. Journal of Textile & Apparel Technology & Management, 2004. 4(1).

[19] Arzu, V. and B. Ender, Identification of female body shapes based on numerical evaluationsnull. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, 2011. 23(1): p. 46-60.

[20] Wong, W., A fuzzy capacity-allocation model for computerised fabric-cutting systems. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2003. 21(9): p. 699-711.

[21] Bilgic and Baykal, The effects of width of the fabric and model type on the efficiency of marker plan in terms of apparel. TEKSTİL ve KONFEKSİYON 26(3), 2016.

[22] Amaral, C., J. Bernardo, and J. Jorge, Marker-making using automatic placement of irregular shapes for the garment industry. Computers & Graphics, 1990. 14(1): p. 41-46.

[23] Mok, P.Y., C.K. Kwong, and W.K. Wong, Optimisation of fault-tolerant fabric-cutting schedules using genetic algorithms and fuzzy set theory. European Journal of Operational Research, 2007. 177(3): p. 1876-1893.

[24] Bennell, J.A. and J.F. Oliveira, The geometry of nesting problems: A tutorial. European Journal of Operational Research, 2008. 184(2): p. 397-415.

[25] Wong, W.K., A selection of a fabric-cutting system configuration in different shapes of apparel manufacturing environments. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2003. 22(9-10): p. 641-648.

[26] Amaral, C., J. Bernardo, and J. Jorge, Marker-making using automatic placement of irregular shapes for the garment industry. Computers & Graphics, 1990. 14(1): p. 41-46.

[27] Czarnecki, C., Integrating the cutting and sewing room of garment manufacture using mechatronic techniques. Mechatronics, 1995. 5(2): p. 295-308.

[28] Wong, W.K., et al., 7 - Optimizing fabric spreading and cutting schedules in apparel production using genetic algorithms and fuzzy set theory, in Optimizing Decision Making in the Apparel Supply Chain Using Artificial Intelligence (AI), W.K. Wong, Z.X. Guo, and S.Y.S. Leung, Editors. 2013, Woodhead Publishing. p. 132-152.

[29] Wong, W.K., C.K. Chan, and W.H. Ip, Optimization of spreading and cutting sequencing model in garment manufacturing. Computers in Industry, 2000. 43(1): p. 1-10.

[30] Wong, W.K., C.K. Chan, and W.H. Ip. Application of fuzzy concept in the apparel industry. in IFSA World Congress and 20th NAFIPS International Conference, 2001. Joint 9th. 2001.

[31] Rose, D.M. and D.R. Shier, Cut scheduling in the apparel industry. Computers & operations research, 2007. 34(11): p. 3209-3228.

[32] Naveed, T., A. Hussain, and Y. Zhong, Reducing fabric wastage through image projected virtual marker (IPVM). Textile Research Journal, 2017: p. 0040517517703605.

[33] Choudhary, A., S. Munjal, and R. Rathore, Significance of Size and Body Image in Buying Behaviour of Females Clothing. International Journal of Retailing & Rural Business Perspectives, 2014. 2(4): p. 629-634.

[34] Ng, S., et al., Fabric Loss during Spreading: A Comparative Study of the Actual Loss in Manufacturing Men’s Shirts. Journal of the Textile Institute, 2001. 92(3): p. 269-279.

[35] D. B. Datta and P. Seal, Various Approaches in Pattern Making for Garment Sector, Journal of Textile Engineering & Fashion Technology, 2018. 4(1): p. 29-34.

[36] Hsu, C.H., Developing accurate industrial standards to facilitate production in apparel manufacturing based on anthropometric data. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 2009. 19(3): p. 199-211.

[37] Glock, R.E. and G.I. Kunz, Apparel manufacturing: Sewn product analysis. 2005: Prentice Hall.

[38] Liu, Y.-J., D.-L. Zhang, and M.M.-F. Yuen, A survey on CAD methods in 3D garment design. Computers in Industry, 2010. 61(6): p. 576-593.

[39] Kayar, M. and Y. Ozel. Using Neural Network Method to Solve Marker Making “Calculation of Fabric Lays Quantities” Efficiency for Optimum Result in the Apparel Industry. in Proceedings of the 8th conference on Simulation, modelling and optimization. 2008. World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS).

[40] Irenee Riter, The science of personal dress complete study: Body shapes. 2015: Amazaon.com.

[41] Hutton, W.C., J.A. Malko, and W.A. Fajman, Lumbar disc volume measured by MRI: effects of bed rest, horizontal exercise, and vertical loading. Aviation, space, and environmental medicine, 2003. 74(1): p. 73-78.

[42] Goel, S. and R. Tashakkori, Correlation Between Body Measurements of Different Genders and Races, in Collaborative Mathematics and Statistics Research. 2015, Springer. p. 7-17.

[43] AGBO, D.D.A., Determination of Body Size and Shape Using Wasit, Bust, and Hip Measurements for Effective Garment Designing for Adult Females in Benue State. Volume 4 April, 2013.: p. 1.

[44] Awoh, D.K., Body Size and Shape Categorization of Some Ethnic Groups in Benue State Using Waist, Bust and Hip Measurements. International Journal of Scientific Research in Information Systems and Engineering (IJSRISE), 2017. 1(1).

[45] Bye, E., et al., Optimized pattern grading. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, 2008. 20(2): p. 79-92.

[46] Li Z and Milenkovic V. Compaction and separation algorithms for non-convex polygons and their applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 1995; 84: 539–561.

Autex Research Journal

The Journal of Association of Universities for Textiles (AUTEX)

Journal Information


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.957
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.027

CiteScore 2017: 1.18

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.448
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 1.465

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 80 80 15
PDF Downloads 72 72 9