A Comparative Study on Fabric Efficiencies for Different Human Body Shapes in the Apparel Industry

Open access

Abstract

In the apparel manufacturing, fabric utilization always remains the significant apprehensions in controlling the production expenditure. Alteration in pattern shapes and marker preparation leads to the enormous utilization of fabric. The purpose of this research is to study fabric efficiency in correspondence with four different human body shapes in both genders. Two clothing styles, fitted trousers and fitted shirts, were processed conventionally in the garment manufacturing company. The comparative study of auto-marker and manual-marker making through Garment Gerber Technology (GGT) software were also accomplished. The evaluation of fabric consumptions, marker efficiency, marker loss, fabric loss, and fabric cost relevant to four different body shapes was analyzed for both women and men. The investigation carried out in this article concludes that there are differences in fabric consumptions, efficiencies, and cost-effectiveness relative to body shapes. The result revealed that the manualmarker of trousers for triangular body shape in women’s wears has the least fabric consumption (most cost-effective), whereas the shirt’s auto-marker for an oval body shape in men’s wears has the most fabric utilization (least costeffective). The manual-virtual-marker making is efficient (significant p-value) than auto-generated-markers. Also, fabric utilization for women’s garments is cost-effective than that for men. Trousers are cost-effective compared to the shirts.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1] Soiinger J. 1988. Apparel Manufacturing Handbook — Analysis Principles and Practice Bobbin Blenheim Columbia. SC USA pp. 3-5.

  • [2] Tung Chun and Hung Solving Cutting Scheduling Problem by Simulated Annealing Search Method IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM). 2016.

  • [3] Wong W.K. and S.Y.S. Leung A Hybrid Planning Process for Improving Fabric Utilization. Textile Research Journal 2009. 79(18): p. 1680-1695.

  • [4] Milenkovic V.J. Rotational polygon overlap minimization and compaction. Computational Geometry 1998. 10(4): p. 305-318.

  • [5] Wong W.K. and S.Y.S. Leung Genetic optimization of fabric utilization in apparel manufacturing. International Journal of Production Economics 2008. 114(1): p. 376-387.

  • [6] Hallah and Bouziri Heuristics for the combined cut order planning two-dimensional layout problem in the apparel industry International Transactions in Operational Research 2016 (23): p. 321-353.

  • [7] Chung M.-J. H.-F. Lin and M.-J.J. Wang The development of sizing systems for Taiwanese elementaryand high-school students. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 2007. 37(8): p. 707-716.

  • [8] Hsu C.-H. Data mining to improve industrial standards and enhance production and marketing: An empirical study in the apparel industry. Expert Systems with Applications 2009. 36(3): p. 4185-4191.

  • [9] Wong W.K. and S.Y.S. Leung A Hybrid Planning Process for Improving Fabric Utilization. Textile Research Journal 2009. 79(18): p. 1680-1695.

  • [10] Nada Y.A. and H. Meshref Analysis Design and Implementation of Intelligent Expert System for Clothes Style Selection. Analysis 2014. 105(4).

  • [11] Choi Y.L. and Y.J. Nam Classification of upper lateral body shapes for the apparel industry. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries 2010. 20(5): p. 378-390.

  • [12] Allen B. B. Curless and Z. Popović. The space of human body shapes: reconstruction and parameterization from range scans. in ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG). 2003. ACM.

  • [13] Alexander M. L. Jo Connell and A. Beth Presley Clothing fit preferences of young female adult consumers. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology 2005. 17(1): p. 52-64

  • [14] Otieno R. G. Pisut and L. Jo Connell Fit preferences of female consumers in the USA. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal 2007. 11(3): p. 366-379.

  • [15] Wong W. Optimisation of apparel manufacturing resource allocation using a generic optimised table-planning model. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2003. 21(12): p. 935-944.

  • [16] Agbo D.A. and V. IGOLI Body Size and Shape Categorization of some Ethnique Groups in Benue State Using Waist Bust and Hip Measurements. International Journal of Scientific Research in Information Systems and Engineering 2015. 1(1): p. 29-36.

  • [17] Simmons K. C. Istook and P. Devarajan Female figure identification technique (FFIT) for apparel. Part I: Describing female shapes. Journal of Textile and Apparel Technology and Management 2004. 4(1): p. 1-16.

  • [18] Simmons K. and C.L. Istook Female Figure Identification Technique (FFIT) for apparel part II: Development of shape sorting software. Journal of Textile & Apparel Technology & Management 2004. 4(1).

  • [19] Arzu V. and B. Ender Identification of female body shapes based on numerical evaluationsnull. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology 2011. 23(1): p. 46-60.

  • [20] Wong W. A fuzzy capacity-allocation model for computerised fabric-cutting systems. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2003. 21(9): p. 699-711.

  • [21] Bilgic and Baykal The effects of width of the fabric and model type on the efficiency of marker plan in terms of apparel. TEKSTİL ve KONFEKSİYON 26(3) 2016.

  • [22] Amaral C. J. Bernardo and J. Jorge Marker-making using automatic placement of irregular shapes for the garment industry. Computers & Graphics 1990. 14(1): p. 41-46.

  • [23] Mok P.Y. C.K. Kwong and W.K. Wong Optimisation of fault-tolerant fabric-cutting schedules using genetic algorithms and fuzzy set theory. European Journal of Operational Research 2007. 177(3): p. 1876-1893.

  • [24] Bennell J.A. and J.F. Oliveira The geometry of nesting problems: A tutorial. European Journal of Operational Research 2008. 184(2): p. 397-415.

  • [25] Wong W.K. A selection of a fabric-cutting system configuration in different shapes of apparel manufacturing environments. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2003. 22(9-10): p. 641-648.

  • [26] Amaral C. J. Bernardo and J. Jorge Marker-making using automatic placement of irregular shapes for the garment industry. Computers & Graphics 1990. 14(1): p. 41-46.

  • [27] Czarnecki C. Integrating the cutting and sewing room of garment manufacture using mechatronic techniques. Mechatronics 1995. 5(2): p. 295-308.

  • [28] Wong W.K. et al. 7 - Optimizing fabric spreading and cutting schedules in apparel production using genetic algorithms and fuzzy set theory in Optimizing Decision Making in the Apparel Supply Chain Using Artificial Intelligence (AI) W.K. Wong Z.X. Guo and S.Y.S. Leung Editors. 2013 Woodhead Publishing. p. 132-152.

  • [29] Wong W.K. C.K. Chan and W.H. Ip Optimization of spreading and cutting sequencing model in garment manufacturing. Computers in Industry 2000. 43(1): p. 1-10.

  • [30] Wong W.K. C.K. Chan and W.H. Ip. Application of fuzzy concept in the apparel industry. in IFSA World Congress and 20th NAFIPS International Conference 2001. Joint 9th. 2001.

  • [31] Rose D.M. and D.R. Shier Cut scheduling in the apparel industry. Computers & operations research 2007. 34(11): p. 3209-3228.

  • [32] Naveed T. A. Hussain and Y. Zhong Reducing fabric wastage through image projected virtual marker (IPVM). Textile Research Journal 2017: p. 0040517517703605.

  • [33] Choudhary A. S. Munjal and R. Rathore Significance of Size and Body Image in Buying Behaviour of Females Clothing. International Journal of Retailing & Rural Business Perspectives 2014. 2(4): p. 629-634.

  • [34] Ng S. et al. Fabric Loss during Spreading: A Comparative Study of the Actual Loss in Manufacturing Men’s Shirts. Journal of the Textile Institute 2001. 92(3): p. 269-279.

  • [35] D. B. Datta and P. Seal Various Approaches in Pattern Making for Garment Sector Journal of Textile Engineering & Fashion Technology 2018. 4(1): p. 29-34.

  • [36] Hsu C.H. Developing accurate industrial standards to facilitate production in apparel manufacturing based on anthropometric data. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries 2009. 19(3): p. 199-211.

  • [37] Glock R.E. and G.I. Kunz Apparel manufacturing: Sewn product analysis. 2005: Prentice Hall.

  • [38] Liu Y.-J. D.-L. Zhang and M.M.-F. Yuen A survey on CAD methods in 3D garment design. Computers in Industry 2010. 61(6): p. 576-593.

  • [39] Kayar M. and Y. Ozel. Using Neural Network Method to Solve Marker Making “Calculation of Fabric Lays Quantities” Efficiency for Optimum Result in the Apparel Industry. in Proceedings of the 8th conference on Simulation modelling and optimization. 2008. World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS).

  • [40] Irenee Riter The science of personal dress complete study: Body shapes. 2015: Amazaon.com.

  • [41] Hutton W.C. J.A. Malko and W.A. Fajman Lumbar disc volume measured by MRI: effects of bed rest horizontal exercise and vertical loading. Aviation space and environmental medicine 2003. 74(1): p. 73-78.

  • [42] Goel S. and R. Tashakkori Correlation Between Body Measurements of Different Genders and Races in Collaborative Mathematics and Statistics Research. 2015 Springer. p. 7-17.

  • [43] AGBO D.D.A. Determination of Body Size and Shape Using Wasit Bust and Hip Measurements for Effective Garment Designing for Adult Females in Benue State. Volume 4 April 2013.: p. 1.

  • [44] Awoh D.K. Body Size and Shape Categorization of Some Ethnic Groups in Benue State Using Waist Bust and Hip Measurements. International Journal of Scientific Research in Information Systems and Engineering (IJSRISE) 2017. 1(1).

  • [45] Bye E. et al. Optimized pattern grading. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology 2008. 20(2): p. 79-92.

  • [46] Li Z and Milenkovic V. Compaction and separation algorithms for non-convex polygons and their applications. European Journal of Operational Research 1995; 84: 539–561.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.927
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.016

CiteScore 2018: 1.21

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.395
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 1.044

Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 211 211 28
PDF Downloads 130 130 10