Comparison of Mechanical and Thermal Comfort Properties of Tencel Blended with Regenerated Fibers and Cotton Woven Fabrics


The demand of cotton is increasing but its low production rate cannot fulfill the world requirements. The increase in cotton demand has augmented the production of regenerated cellulosic fibers. Furthermore, cotton has proved to be unsustainable because of the use of huge amount of fresh water, pesticides and insecticides. The purpose of this work is to find out the suitable blend/blends of regenerated fibers so as to replace 100% cotton fabrics. Therefore, mechanical and comfort properties of Tencel fabrics blended with other regenerated cellulose fibers have been compared with 100% cotton to achieve the equivalent or even better end properties. Hence, cotton, viscose, Tencel, modal, and bamboo fibers were taken. Plain woven blended fabrics of 100% cotton and 50:50 blends of Tencel with other regenerated fibers were prepared from normal yarn count of 20 tex. The mechanical properties (warp-wise and weft-wise tensile and tear strengths, pilling, and abrasion resistance) and the comfort properties including air permeability, moisture management properties, and thermal resistance were evaluated. It is found that Tencel blended fabrics show better results than 100% cotton fabrics. Therefore, it is concluded that Tencel blended with these regenerated fabrics can be used to replace 100% cotton fabrics.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1] Lenzing.The Global Fiber Market in 2016

  • [2] Bellon-Maurel, V., Peters, G.M., Clermidy, S., Frizarin, G., Sinfort, C., et al. (2015). Streamlining life cycle inventory data generation in agriculture using traceability data and information and communication technologies–part II: application to viticulture, Journal of cleaner production, 87(119-129.

  • [3] Kayseri, G.O., Bozdogan, F. and Hes, L. (2010). Performance properties of regenerated cellulose fibers, Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon, 20(3). 208-212.

  • [4] Carrillo, F., Colom, X., Sunol, J. and Saurina, J. (2004). Structural FTIR analysis and thermal characterisation of lyocell and viscose-type fibres, European Polymer Journal, 40(9). 2229-2234.

  • [5] Prakash, C., Ramakrishnan, G. and Koushik, C.V. (2013). A study of the thermal properties of bamboo knitted fabrics, Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 111(1). 101-105.

  • [6] Rana, S., Pichandi, S., Parveen, S. and Fangueiro, R., “Regenerated cellulosic fibers and their implications on sustainability,” in Roadmap to Sustainable Textiles and Clothing, ed: Springer, 2014, pp. 239-276.

  • [7] Kilic, M. and Okur, A. (2011). The properties of cotton-Tencel and cotton-Promodal blended yarns spun in different spinning systems, Textile Research Journal, 81(2). 156-172.

  • [8] Xijun, W.H.Y. (2007). Development of Tencel Fiber Pure Yarn and Tencel Blended yarn [J], Cotton Textile Technology, 10(p020.

  • [9] Firgo, H., Suchomel, F. and Burrow, T. (2006). Tencel® high performance sportswear, Lenzinger Berichte, 85(44-50.

  • [10] Shanmugasundaram, G.K.G.N.O. (2016). Thermal comfort properties of bamboo tencel knitted fabrics, Science and Technology, 28(4). 420-428.

  • [11] Frydrych, I., Dziworska, G. and Bilska, J. (2002). Comparative analysis of the thermal insulation properties of fabrics made of natural and man-made cellulose fibres, Fibres and Textiles in Eastern Europe, 10(4). 40-44.

  • [12] Sakthivel, J.C. and Anbumani, N. (2012). Dimensional Properties of Single Jersey Knitted Fabrics Made with New and Regenerated Cellulosic Fibers, Journal of Textile and Apparel, Technology and Management, 7(3).

  • [13] Kreze, T. and Malej, S. (2003). Structural characteristics of new and conventional regenerated cellulosic fibers, Textile Research Journal, 73(8). 675-684.

  • [14] Stana-Kleinschek, K., Ribitsch, V., Kreže, T., Sfiligoj-Smole, M. and Peršin, Z. (2003). Correlation of regenerated cellulose fibres morphology and surface free energy components, Lenzinger Berichte, 82(1). 83-95.

  • [15] Uchida, Y. (1967). Problems of Polynosic and high wet modulus-fibres, Pure and Applied Chemistry, 14(3-4). 461-474.

  • [16] Erdumlu, N. and Ozipek, B. (2008). Investigation of regenerated bamboo fibre and yarn characteristics, Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe, 16(4), p 69.

  • [17] Permeability, A. Standard Test Method for Air Permeability of Textile Fabrics, ASTM D737-96.

  • [18] Kullman, R.M., Graham JR, C.O. and Ruppenicker, G.F. (1981). Air permeability of Fabrics made from unique and Conventional yarns, Textile Research Journal, 51(12). 781-786.

  • [19] Tascan, M. and Vaughn, E.A. (2008). Effects of fiber denier, fiber cross-sectional shape and fabric density on acoustical behavior of vertically lapped nonwoven fabrics, Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics, 3(2). 32-38.

  • [20] Gun, A.D. (2011). Dimensional, physical and thermal properties of plain knitted fabrics made from 50/50 blend of modal viscose fiber in microfiber form with cotton fiber, Fibers and Polymers, 12(8). 1083-1090.

  • [21] Leading fibre innovation (25 April)Available:

  • [22] Tyagi, G., Krishna, G., Bhattacharya, S. and Kumar, P. (2009). Comfort aspects of finished polyester-cotton and polyester-viscose ring and MJS yarn fabrics.

  • [23] Abu-Rous, M., Ingolic, E. and Schuster, K. (2006). Visualisation of the Nano-Structure of Tencel®(Lyocell) and Other Cellulosics as an Approach to Explaining Functional and Wellness Properties in Textiles, Lenzinger Berichte, 85(31-37.

  • [24] Männer, J., Schuster, K.C., Suchomel, F., Gürtler, A. and Firgo, H. (2004). Higher performance with natural intelligence, Lenzinger Berichte, 83(99-110.


Journal + Issues