Optimization of Operational Parameters of Foam Sizing Process for Cotton Yarns Based on Plackett-Burman Experiment Design

Open access


This study was aimed at investigating the process optimization of foam sizing for cotton yarns. In this work, effects of major foam-sizing process factors including size concentration, blowing ratio, stirring speed, pre-wetting temperature, pre-drying temperature, squeezing pressure and drying temperature were studied on the hairiness (more than 3 mm) and abrasion resistance of foam-sized yarns. The combination of Plackett-Burman, steepest ascent path analysis and Box-Behnken design were adopted to optimize the foam-sizing process of cotton yarns. Results revealed that size concentration, blowing ratio and squeezing pressure were significant factors that affected the hairiness and abrasion resistance. Optimum hairiness and abrasion resistance were obtained when the cotton yarns were sized at size concentration of 19.33%, blowing ratio of 4.27 and squeezing pressure of 0.78kN. The theoretical values and the observed values were in reasonably good agreement and the deviation was less than 1%. Verifcation and repeated trial results showed that it has good reproducibility and imparts the foam sizing process of cotton yarns.

[1] Perkins W., Walker R. (1982). Foam Sizing. Textile Research Journal, 9, 547-554.

[2] Lu K., Zhang X. L., Zhao Y.L., Wu Z.L. (2010). Removal of color from textile dyeing wastewater by foam separation. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 182, (1-3), 928-932.

[3] Yu H., Wang Y.L., Zhong Y., Mao Z.P., Tan S. S. (2014). Foam properties and application in dyeing cotton fabrics with reactive dyes. Coloration Technology, 130(4), 266-272.

[4] Julieta S. N., Guilherme C. M., Carlos J. S., Reis C., Reis E. L. (2011). Polyurethane foams for the removal of the Direct Red 80 and Reactive Blue 21 dyes in aqueous medium. Desalination, 281, 55-60.

[5] Li K., Zhang J., Gong J. (2014) Wrinkle-resistant finish of foam technology for cotton fabric. Journal of Industrial Textiles, 43(4), 525-535.

[6] Baker K., Bryant G., Camp J., Kelsey B. (1982). Foam Finishing Technology. Textile Research Journal, 1982, 52(6), 395-403.

[7] Namboodri C., Duke M. (1979). Foam Finishing of Cotton-Containing Textiles. Textile Research Journal, 49(3), 156-162.

[8] Gregorian, Bafford, Namboodri. (1979). The utilization of foams in wet processing of textiles. American Chemical Society, 107, 155-174.

[9] Perkins W., Walker R. (1984). Some Observations on Foam Sizing. Textile Chemist & Colorist, 4, 37-39.

[10] Perkins W., Walker R. (1980). Foam sizing can halve energy costs. Textile World, 130(3), 55-62.

[11] Namboodri C. (1986). Foam Sizing of Cotton and Blend Yarns: Slashing Trials. Textile Research Journal, 2, 87-92.

[12] Trauter, Vialon. (1986). Aspects of Foam Sizing. Textiletrieb, 104(3), 33-41.

[13] Trauter, Vialon. (1987). State of Foam Sizing. Textile Asia, 18(4),97.

[14] Vernkar. (1992). Foam Sizing-Perspectives and Limitaions. Man-made Textiles in India, 35(2), 51-52.

[15] Shah, Gandhi. (1990). Technique of Foam Sizing. Indian Textile Journal, 100(2), 184-185.

[16] Beck. (1989). Foam Technology in Yarn Sizing. Textile Praxis Intertional, 623.

[17] Yan X., Zhao J. (1988). Foam sizing-the performance characteristics of foaming. Journal of China Textile University, 14(4), 1-8.

[18] Zhou X., Zhang S. (1999). The research of foam sizing. Journal of zhejiang college of engineering, 16(3), 166-171.

[19] Gao W. D., Fan X. R., Liu J. L., Zhang J. X., Du L. X. (2014). Technology Study of Foam Sizing. Cotton Textile Technology, 42(9), 1-5.

[20] Lu Y. Z., Zhang J. X., Liu J. L., Gao W. D. (2014). Sizing effects of foam-sizing and yarn pre-wetting combined process. Journal of Textile Research, 12(35), 47-51.

Autex Research Journal

The Journal of Association of Universities for Textiles (AUTEX)

Journal Information

IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.957
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.027

CiteScore 2017: 1.18

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.448
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 1.465


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 279 279 34
PDF Downloads 124 124 14