Geometrical Modeling of Woven Fabrics Weavability-Limit New Relationships

Open access


The weavability limit and tightness for 2D and 3D woven fabrics is an important factor and depends on many geometric parameters. Based on a comprehensive review of the literature on textile fabric construction and property, and related research on fabric geometry, a study of the weavability limit and tightness relationships of 2D and 3D woven fabrics was undertaken. Experiments were conducted on a representative number of polyester and cotton woven fabrics which have been woven in our workshop, using three machines endowed with different insertion systems (rapier, projectiles and air jet). Afterwards, these woven fabrics have been analyzed in the laboratory to determine their physical and mechanical characteristics using air permeability-meter and KES-F KAWABATA Evaluation System for Fabrics. In this study, the current Booten’s weavability limit and tightness relationships based on Ashenhurst’s, Peirce’s, Love’s, Russell’s, Galuszynskl’s theory and maximum-weavability is reviewed and modified as new relationships to expand their use to general cases (2D and 3D woven fabrics, all fiber materiel, all yarns etc…). The theoretical relationships were examined and found to agree with experimental results. It was concluded that the weavability limit and tightness relationships are useful tools for weavers in predicting whether a proposed fabric construction was weavable and also in predicting and explaining their physical and mechanical properties.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1] D.P. Adams E.R. Schwarz and S. Backer. The Relationship between the Structural Geometry of a Textile Fabric and its Physical Properties. PartVI: Nomographic Solution or the Geometric Relationships in Clolh Geometry. Text. Res. J. 1956 26 653-665.

  • [2] M.W. Alford. Ratio Comparison of Fabric Structures. J. Text. Inst. 1964 55 T83-98.

  • [3] T.R. Ashenhurst. A treatise on textile calculations and the Structure of Fabrics 1884.1 Broadbent London.

  • [4] N.C. Gee. Cloth Setting and Setting Theories. Text. Mfr 1953 80 381-384.

  • [5] N.C. Gee. Cloth Setting and Setting Theories. Text. Mfr 1953 80 399-401.

  • [6] H.C. Haller. Maximum Construction Tables tor Fabrics of Creslan Acrylic Fiber and Other Fibers. Paper presented at National Meeting of AATCC Philadelphia PA USA 1960.

  • [7] J.B. Hamilton. A Direct Method tor Measuring Yam Diameters and Bulk Densities under Conditions of Thread Flattening. J. Text. lnst. 1959 50 T655-T672.

  • [8] H.W. Russell. Help for Designers. Construction Factor - An Aid to FabJic Evaluation and Design. Text. Industr 1965 129 No. 6 51-53.

  • [9] S. Brierley. Theory and Practice of Cloth Setting. Text. Mfr 1931 58 3-4.

  • [10] S. Brierley. Theory and Practice of Cloth Setting. Text. Mfr 1931 58 47-49.

  • [11] S. Brierley. Cloth Setting Reconsidered. Part I. Tex. Mfr 152 79 349-351.

  • [12] S. Brierley. CIOUl Setting Reconsidered. Part ll. Text. Mfr. 1952. 79 431-433.

  • [13] S. Brierley. Cloth Setting Reconsidered. Part III. Text. Mfr. L952 79 449-453.

  • [14] S. Brierley. Cloth Setting Reconsidered. Part IV. Text. Mfr L952 79 533-537.

  • [15] H. Bogaty G.H. Lourigan and H.E. Hanis. Structural Compactness of Woven Wool Fabrics and their Behavior in Modern Washing Machines. Text. Res. J. 195.8. 28 733-737.

  • [16] J.J. Brown and R.A. Rusca. the Effect of Fabric Structure on Fabric Properties. Text. Res. J. 1955.5 25 472-476.

  • [17] K.J. Butler and W.T. Cowhig. Yam In’egularity Picture Recorder. Skinner ‘s Silk & Rayol1 Rec. L954 28 1178-1181.

  • [18] H. Catling. Some Effects of Sinusoidal Periodic Yam Thickness Variation on the Appearance of Woven Cloth. J. Text. Insl. 1958 49 T232-T246.

  • [19] N.H. Chamberlain and D.C. Snowden. Loom Study by Means of the Cathode Ray Oscillograph. Part I: Variation in Individual Warp Thread Tension during the Weaving Cycle. J. Text. Inst. l.2.48 39 T23-T43.

  • [20] J.B Dickson. Practical Loom Experience on Weavability Limits. Text. Res. J. 1948. 24. 1083-1093.

  • [21] P. Ellis and D.L. Munden. ATheoretical Analysis and Experimental Study of the Plain Square Weave. Part I: The Effect of Seu and Degree of Relaxation on the Measured Cross-sectional Dimensions of Yarns.J. Text.inst. 1973 64 279-294.

  • [22] R. Foster. Weaving Investigations Periodic Patteming in Fabrics. J. Text. lnst. L952 43 P742-P754.

  • [23] S. Galuszynski. Fabric Tightness: A Coefficient to Indicate Fabric structure. J. Text. lnst. 981 72 44-49.

  • [24] J.B. Hamihon. A General System of Woven Fabric Geometry. J. Text. lnst. 1964 55 T66-T82.

  • [25] J. W.S. Hearle P. Grosberg and S. Backer. Structural Mechanics of Fibers. Yarns and Fabrics Vol. l Wiley Interscience New York NY USA 1969.

  • [26] E.R. Kaswell. Textile Fibers Ya/’l1s. and Fabrics: A Comparative Survey of Their Behavior with Special Reference to Wool Reinhold New York NY USA 1953.

  • [27] Kemp. An Extension of Peirce’s Cloth Geometry to the Treatment of Non-circular Threads. J. Text. lnst. 1958 49 T44-T47.

  • [28] W. Law. A Practical Treatise on Cloth Building. Wool Rec. 1922 21 968 et seq. (series concluding on 1486).

  • [29] L. Love. Graphical Relationships in Cloth Geomelty for Plain Twill and Sateen Weaves. Text. Res. J. 1954 24 1073-1083.

  • [30] Newton. The comparison of Woven Fabrics by Reference to their Tightness. J. Text. lnst. 1995 86 232-240.

  • [31] Newton. Tightness Comparison of Woven fabrics. lndian Text. J. 1991 101 Feb. 38-40.

  • [32] E. V. Painter. Mechanics of Elastic Performance of Textile Materials. Part VIII: Graphical Analysis of Fabric Geometry. Text. Res. J.. 1952 22 153-169

  • [33] F.T. Peirce. The Geometry of Cloth Structure. J. Text. Inst. 1937 28 T45-112.

  • [34] D.E.A. Plate and K. Hepworth. Beat-up Forces in Weaving. Part II. J. Text. Inst. 1973 64 233-249.

  • [35] E.B. Sehuler. Analysis of Loom Stoppages. M.S. Thesis North Carolina State University 1993.

  • [36] A.M. Seyam. On the Mechanics of Woven Fabrics. Doctoral Thesis North Carolina State University 1985.

  • [37] A.M. Seyam. Weavability Limit of Yarns with Thickness Variation in Shuttleless Weaving: The Single Weft Yarn Feeder Case. Text. Res. J. 2000 70 129-134.

  • [38] A.M. Seyam and A. EI-Shiekh. Mechanics of Woven Fabrics. Part 1: Theoretical lnvestigation of Weavability Limit of Yarns with Thickness Variation. Tex. Res. J. 1990 60 389-404.

Journal information
Impact Factor

IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.927
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.016

CiteScore 2018: 1.21

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.395
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 1.044

Cited By
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 416 168 6
PDF Downloads 177 99 4