The Efficiency of Non-Flammable Functional Underwear

Open access


This study evaluates the efficiency of non-flammable functional underwear used as a secondary heat barrier in extreme conditions. Five groups of knitted fabrics were analysed for flame resistance and selected physiological properties (water vapour permeability, air permeability, thermal resistance and liquid moisture transport by moisture management transport). The results indicated similar levels of flame resistance for the materials tested but show important differences in terms of physiological characteristics, namely liquid moisture transport, which influences the safety and comfort of protective clothing.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1] Bao-guo Y. et al. (2006). An improved test method for characterizing the dynamic liquid moisture transfer in porous polymeric materials. Polymer Testing 25 (5) pp. 677-689.

  • [2] Bourbigot S. and Flambard X. (2002). Heat Resistance and Flammability of High Performance Fibres: A Review Fire And Materials 26 (4-5) pp. 155-168.

  • [3] Cardoso I. an Gomes J. R. (2009). The application of microcapsules of PCM in flame resistant non-woven materials International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology 21 (2/3) pp. 102-108

  • [4] Havelka A. Kus Z. (2012). Innovations in Textile materials & Protective clothing. Monograph Warsaw Technical university of Lodz press. The importance of moisture transport in the insulating properties of sandwich structures smart clothes. ISBN 978-83-7283-493-5 pp. 137-144.

  • [5] Heffels P. (2006). Protective clothing against rain or low temperatures - overview of European standards 3rd European Conference on Protective Clothing (ECPC) Gdynia Poland

  • [6] House J. R. (2004). Effectiveness of Proban¯ flame retardant in used clothing International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology 16 (4) pp. 361-367

  • [7] Hu J. et al. (2005). Moisture Management tester: A Method to Characterize Fabric Liquid Moisture Management properties Textile Research Journal 75 (1)pp. 57-62

  • [8] Mamalis P. (2001). The effect of a durable flame-retardant finishing on the mechanical properties of cotton knitted fabrics International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology 13 (2) pp. 132-134

  • [9] Mikucioniene D. et al. (2012). Influence of plan Knits Structure on Flammability and Air Permeability Fibres & Textile in Eastern Europe 20 (5) pp.66-69

  • [10] Mikucioniene D. et al. (2011). Influence of the Number of Yarns in a Loop on the Flammability of Knits Fibres & Textile in Eastern Europe 19 (6) pp.71-74

  • [11] Nazir A. et al. (2014) Effect of Knitting Parameters on Moisture Management and Air Permeability of Interlock Fabrics AUTEXResearch Journal 14(1) pp.39-46

  • [12] Oner E. et al. (2013). Evaluation of Moisture Management Properties on knitted fabrics Journal of the Textile Institute 104 (7) pp.699-707

  • [13] Ozcan G. et al. (2004). Impact of Finishing Processes on Flame Resistance of Knitted Fabric Textile Research Journal 74’(6) pp. 490-496.

  • [14] Troynikov O. Wardiningsih W. (2011). Moisture management properties of wool/polyester and wool/ bamboo knitted fabrics for the sportswear base layer Textile Research Journal 2011 81(6) pp. 621-631.

  • [15] Varga K. et al. (2011). Thermal and Sorption Study of Flame-resistant Fibres. LenzingerBerichte 89 pp.50-59

  • [16] Weil E. D. and Levchnik S. V. (2008). Flame retardants in Commercial Use or Development for Textiles Journal of Fire Sciences 26 (3) pp. 243-281.

Journal information
Impact Factor

IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.927
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.016

CiteScore 2018: 1.21

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.395
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 1.044

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 523 300 15
PDF Downloads 152 88 7