Post-Medium Literature? Two Examples of Contemporary Scandinavian

Open access


This article discusses two contemporary Scandinavian literary texts: Ursula Andkjaer Olsen’s Danish book of poetry called Havet er en scene [The Sea Is a Stage], and Abo Rasul’s (pseudonym for Matias Faldbakken) Norwegian novel Unfun. I intend to show that these texts exemplify two very different but nevertheless comparable positions in contemporary Scandinavian literature. Despite the differences, they resemble each other in that they actively mix medial constellations to offer social critique, and the aim of this article is thus to investigate the specific relation between medial mixture and social critique.

Andkjeer Olsen, Ursula. 2008. Havet er en scene. [The sea is a stage] Kobenhavn: Gyldendal.

Bakhtin, M. M. 1981. The Dialogical Imagination. Austin: Texas UP.

-. 1984. Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Minnesota: Minnesota UP.

Bruhn, Jorgen. 2010. Heteromediality. In Media Borders, Multimodality and Intermediality, ed. Lars Elleström, 225-236. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Clover. Carol J. 1992. Men, Women, and Chainsaws: Gender in the Modern Horror Film. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Dahl. Christian. Unpublished ms: “Scandinavian Misanthropy and Transgression: The Poetics of Matias Faldbakken.” Debord, Guy. 1970 [1967]. The Society of the Spectacle. TVans. Fredv Perlman and Jon Supak. New York: Black and Red.

Easton Ellis. Bret. 1991. American Psycho. New York: Vintage Books.

Elleström. Lars. 2010. The Modalities of Media. A Model for Understanding Intermedial Relations. In Media Borders. Multimodality and Intermediality, ed. Lars Elleström, 11-19. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

-. 2011. Visuell ikonicitet i lyrik: en intermedial och semiotisk undersökning med speciellt fokus pă svensksprăkig lyrik frán sent 1900-tal. Hedemora: Gidlunds förlag.

Fangel, Gitte. 2005. “Jeg har slugt for mange svaner og for fá som - interview med Ursula Andkjeer Olsen og Adda Djorup.”

Frye, Northrop. 1957. Anatomy of Criticism. Princeton: Princeton UP.

Helbig, J. 2008. Intermedialitât - eine spezifische Form des Medienkontakts oder globaler Oberbegriff? In Media Encounters and Media Theories, ed. Jürgen E. Müller, 79-87. Münster: Nodus.

Koebner, Thomas, ed. 1989. Laokoon und kein Ende: Der Wettstreit der Kiinste, Litteratur und andere Kiinste. München: Edition Text und Kritik.

Krauss, Rosalind. 1999. A Voyage on the North Sea. Art in the Age of the Post- Medium Condition. London: Thames & Hudson.

-. 2006. Two Moments from the Post-Medium Condition. October vol. 116: 55-62.

Kulish, Nicholas. 2006. “Television you can’t put down.” The New York Times, September 10.

Malvik, Anders Skare. 2010. Naivismus. Nihilismus, Negation - zur Asthetik in Abo Rasuls Unfun. In Figuren des Dazwischen. Naivităt in Kunst, Pop- und Populărkultur, eds. Stefan Krankenhagen und Hans-Otto Hügel, 109-133. Wilhelm Fink Verlag.

Mitchell W. J. T. 1994. Picture Theory: Essays on Visual and Verbal Representation. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

-. 2005. There Are No Visual Media. Journal of Visual Culture vol. 4 no. 2: 257-266.

Pethő Ágnes. 2010. Intermediality in Film. A Historiography of Methodologies. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae. Film and Media Studies vol. 2: 39-72.

-. 2011. Cinema and Intermediality. The Passion for the In-between. Newcastle on Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Rajewsky, Irina. 2002. Intermedialitat. [Intermediality] Tübingen: A. Francke Verlag.

Rasul. Abo. 2001. The Cocka Hola Company. Skandinaidsk misantropi. Oslo: Cappelen.

-. 2002. Macht und Rebel. Skandinavisk misantropi 2. Oslo: Cappelen.

-. 2008. Unfun. Skandinavisk misantropi 3. Oslo: Cappelen.

Relihan. Joel. 1993. Ancient Menippean Satire. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.

Schnitzler. Andreas. 2007. Der Wettstreit der Kiinste. Berlin: Reimer Verlag.

Spielmann, Yvonne. 1997. Intermedialitat. Das System Peter Greenaway. [Intermediality. The Peter Greenaway system] München: W. Fink.

-. 2010. New and Novelty in Contemporary Media Cultures. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Film and Media Studies vol. 3: 7-18. -. 2010. Hybridkultur. Berlin: Suhrkamp Taschenbuch.

Schröter, Jens. 2010. The Politics of Intermediality - New and Novelty in Contemporary Media Cultures. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Film and Media Studies, vol. 2: 107-124.

Stein Larsen, Peter. 2009. Dromme og dialoger. To poetiske traditioner omkring 2000. Odense: Svddansk Universitetsforlag.

Vignes, Jean. 1985. Culture et histoire dans la Satvre Menippee. In Etudes sur la Satyre Mennippée, eds. Frank Lestringant and Daniel Menager. 151-199. Geneva: Droz.

Voigts-Virchow, Eckart. 1991. Metadaptation: Adaptation and Intermediality - Cock and Bull. Journal of Adaptation in Film & Performance, vol. 2, no. 2: 137-152.

Wolf, Werner. 2010. Intermedialitat und mediale Dominanz typologisch, funktionsgeschichtlich und akademisch-institutionell betrachtet. In Der Neue Wettstreit der Kiinste. Legitimation und Dominanz im Zeichen der Intermedialitat, eds. Uta Degner and Norbert Christian Wolf, 241-260. Bielefeld: Transcript.

Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica

The Journal of Sapientia Hungarian University of Transylvania

Journal Information


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 126 120 14
PDF Downloads 55 53 6