Television and Video Screens in Filmic Narratives: Medium Specificity, Noise and Frame-Work

Andrea Virginás 1
  • 1 Sapientia Hungarian University of Transylvania, , Cluj-Napoca, Romania

Abstract

The paper discusses pertinent aspects of the screen as a device of framing and re-ordering. Television and video screens introduced in filmic diegesis are attributed three main functions (spatial, temporal, and topical re-ordering) and are related to the relationships Gerard Genette establishes between first-order narrative and metadiegetic levels (1987), as well as to Lars Elleström’s extracommunicational and intracommunicational actual and virtual spheres (2018). The visibility through noise of the televisual and of the video media is theorized based on Sybille Krämer’s media theory (2015) and three pre-digital arthouse films: Videodrome (David Cronenberg, 1984), Irma Vep (Olivier Assayas, 1996), and Lost Highway (David Lynch, 1997).1

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Bolter, Jay David and Richard Grusin. 2000 [1999]. Remediation. Understanding New Media. Cambridge, MA, London, England: MIT Press.

  • Bruno, Giuliana. 2014. Surface: Matters of Aesthetics, Materiality, and Media. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

  • Chateau, Dominique. 2016. Between Fascination and Denial: The Power of the Screen. In Screens. From Materiality to Spectatorship – A Historical and Theoretical Reassessment, eds. Dominique Chateau and José Moure, 186–199. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

  • Cramer, Florian. Post-Digital Aesthetics. Le Magazine Jeu de Paume, May 1, 2015. http://lemagazine.jeudepaume.org/2013/05/florian-cramer-post-digital-aesthetics/. Last accessed 19. 07. 2019.

  • Derrida, Jacques. 1987. The Truth in Painting. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

  • Enns, Anthony. 2015. Introduction: The Media Philosophy of Sybille Krämer. In Sybille Krämer: Medium, Messenger, Transmission. An Approach to Media Philosophy, 9–18. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

  • Elleström, Lars. 2014. Media Transformation: The Transfer of Media Characteristics among Media. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Elleström, Lars. 2018. Coherence and Truthfulness in Communication: Intracommunicational and Extracommunicational Indexicality. Semiotica 225: 423–446.

  • Elsaesser, Thomas. 2016. Film History as Media Archaeology: Tracking Digital Cinema. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

  • Gaudreault, André and Philippe Marion. 2015. The End of Cinema? A Medium in Crisis in the Digital Age. New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Genette, Gerard. 1983. Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.

  • Grodal, Torben. 2002 [1997]. Moving Pictures. A New Theory of Film Genres, Feelings and Cognition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Johnston, John. 1997. Friedrich Kittler: Media Theory after Poststructuralism. In Friedrich A. Kittler: Literature, Media, Information Systems. Essays, ed. John Johnston, 1–26. Amsterdam: G+B Arts International.

  • Kittler, Friedrich A. 1997. The World of the Symbolic – A World of the Machine. In Literature, Media, Information Systems. Essays, ed. John Johnston, 130–146. Amsterdam: G+B Arts International.

  • Krämer, Sybille. 2015. Medium, Messenger, Transmission. An Approach to Media Philosophy. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

  • Manovich, Lev. 2001. The Language of New Media. Cambridge, Massachusetts – London, England: The MIT Press.

  • Odin, Roger. 2016. The Concept of the Mental Screen: The Internalized Screen, the Dream Screen, and the Constructed Screen. In Screens. From Materiality to Spectatorship – A Historical and Theoretical Reassessment, eds. Dominique Chateau and José Moure, 176–185. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

  • Persson, Per. 1999. Understanding Representations of Space: A Comparison of Visualisation Techniques in Mainstream Cinema and Computer Interfaces. In Social Navigation of Information Space, eds. Alan J. Munro, Kristina Höök and David Benyon, 195–218. Springer PH.

  • Sobchack, Vivian. 2000 [1990]. The Scene of the Screen: Envisioning Cinematic and Electronic “Presence.” In Film and Theory: An Anthology, eds. Robert Stam and Toby Miller, 66–84. Malden: Blackwell Publishers.

  • Strauven, Wanda. 2016. The Screenic Image: Between Verticality and Horizontality, Viewing and Touching, Displaying and Playing. In Screens. From Materiality to Spectatorship – A Historical and Theoretical Reassessment, eds. Dominique Chateau and José Moure, 143–156. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

  • Virginás, Andrea. 2007. A múlt egy képernyő? Az elsőszintű diegézis megnyitása médiumok közbeiktatása révén [The Past is a Screen? Fracturing the Diegesis through Other Media]. In Film, Kép. Nyelv [Film. Image. Language], ed. Pethő Ágnes, 259–275. Cluj-Napoca: Scientia.

  • Virginás, Andrea. 2015. Screens “as Representation” and Screens “as Simulation” in Mainstream Cinema Detection: between Blade Runner (1982) and Splice (2009). The Nordic Journal of Aesthetics vol. 24, no. 47: 76–93.

  • Virginás, Andrea. 2017. Gendered Transmediation of the Digital from S1m0ne to Ex Machina: “Visual Pleasure” Reloaded? European Journal of English Studies vol. 21, no 3: 288–303.

  • Virginás, Andrea. 2018. On the Role of Diegetic Electronic Screens in Contemporary European Cinema. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae: Film and Media Studies vol. 15, no. 1: 87–102.

OPEN ACCESS

Journal + Issues

Search