German Cinematic Expressionism in Light of Jungian and Post-Jungian Approaches

Open access

Abstract

Prerogative of what Jung calls visionary art, the aesthetics of German Expressionist cinema is “primarily expressive of the collective unconscious,” and – unlike the psychological art, whose goal is “to express the collective consciousness of a society” – they have succeeded not only to “compensate their culture for its biases” by bringing “to the consciousness what is ignored or repressed,” but also to “predict something of the future direction of a culture” (Rowland 2008, italics in the original, 189–90). After a theoretical introduction, the article develops this idea through the example of three visionary works: Arthur Robison’s Warning Shadows (Schatten, 1923), Fritz Lang’s The Weary Death aka Destiny (Der müde Tod, 1921), and Paul Leni’s Waxworks (Wachsfigurenkabinett, 1924).

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Baer Nicholas. 2015. Metaphysics of Finitude: Der müde Tod and the Crisis of Historicism. In A Companion to Fritz Lang ed. Joe McElhaney 141–161. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

  • Braskén Kasper. 2014. The International Workers’ Relief Communism and Transnational Solidarity: Willi Münzenberg in Weimar Germany. London: Palgrave-McMillan.

  • Coates Paul. 1991. The Gorgon’s Gaze: German Cinema Expressionism and the Image of Horror. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Connolly Angela. 2008. Jung in the Twilight Zone: The Psychological Functions of Horror Film. In Psyche and the Arts ed. Susan Rowland 128–38. London New York: Routledge.

  • Demir Ayla Michelle. Transference and Countertransference in Qualitative Research. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/278847954_Transference_and_Countertransference_in_Qualitative_Research. Last accessed 30. 03. 2019.

  • Dr. Mabuse the Gambler. http://www.acinemahistory.com/2015/11/dr-mabuseder-spieler-1922-dr-mabuse.html?q=destiny. Last accessed 30. 03. 2019.

  • Elsaesser Thomas. 2000. Weimar Cinema and after: Germany’s Historical Imaginary. New York: Routledge.

  • Fredericksen Don. 2001. Jung/Sign/Symbol/Film. In Jung & Film: Post-Jungian Takes on the Moving Image eds. Christopher Hauke and Ian Alister 17–55. East Sussex Philadelphia: Brunner-Routledge.

  • Goethe Johann Wolfgang von. 1949. Maximen und Reflexionen [Maxims and Reflections]. Zürich.

  • Guffey Rudolf. 2016. Here among the Dead: The Phantom Carriage and the Cinema of the Occulted Taboo. In Expressionism in the Cinema eds. Olaf Brill and Gary D. Rhodes 169–189. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

  • Huckvale David. 2018. Movie Magick: The Occult in Film. Jefferson North Carolina: McFarland and Co.

  • Jung Carl Gustav. 1968. Aion: Researches into the Phenomenology of the Self. In Collected Works vol. 9ii. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • Jung Carl Gustav. 1989a [1962]. Memories Dreams Reflections. Vintage Books: New York.

  • Jung Carl Gustav. 1989b [1966]. Psychology and Literature. In The Spirit in Man Art LiteratureCollected Works vol. 15 84–105 Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press

  • Kracauer Siegfried. 1974. From Caligari to Hitler: A Psychological History of German Film. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • Monk Ray. 2005. How to Read Wittgenstein. New York: W. W. Norton.

  • Nietzsche Friedrich. 2006. On the Genealogy of Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Rowland Susan. 2008. Glossary. In Psyche and the Arts ed. S. Rowland 183–190. London New York: Routledge.

  • Rowland Susan. 2010. C.G. Jung in the Humanities: Taking the Soul’s Path. New Orleans: Spring Journal Books.

  • Rowland Susan. 2013. Reading Jung for magic: “Active imagination” for/as “close reading.” In How and Why We Still Read Jung eds. Jane Kirsch and Murray Stein 86–106. London New York: Routledge.

  • Rowland Susan. 2018. Jungian Literary Criticism: The Essential Guide. London New York: Routledge.

  • Sharp Daryl. 1991. Jung Lexicon: A Primer of Terms & Concepts. Inner City Books. https://www.psychceu.com/Jung/sharplexicon.html. Last accessed 30. 03. 2019.

  • Sipiora Philip. 2016. Nietzsche’s Fingerprints on The Hands of Orlac. In Expressionism in the Cinema eds. Olaf Brill and Gary D. Rhodes 169–189. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

  • Smythe William. 2012. Archetypal Hermeneutics as an Approach to the Psychology of Religion. Journal of Religious Studies and Theology vol.31 no. 2: 147–163.

  • Telotte J. P. 2005. German Expressionism: A Cinematic/Cultural Problem. In Traditions in World Cinema eds. Linda Badley R. Barton Palmer and Steven Jay Schneider 15–28. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

  • The Hands of Orlac. http://www.acinemahistory.com/2016/06/orlacs-hande-1924-hands-of-orlac.html?q=orlac. Last accessed 30. 03. 2019.

  • Thompson Kristin and David Bordwell. 2003. Film History: An Introduction. New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • Todorov Tzvetan 1975. The Fantastic: A Structural Approach to a Literary Genre. New York: Cornell University Press.

  • van den Berk Tjeu. 2012. Jung on Art: The Autonomy of the Creative Drive. London New York: Routledge.

  • von Franz Marie-Louise. 1993. Psychotherapy. Boston and London: Shambala.

  • Wittgenstein Ludwig. 2015. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. http://people.umass.edu/klement/tlp/. Last accessed 30. 03. 2019.

Search
Journal information
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 66 66 40
PDF Downloads 60 60 41