The Experiences of Women Professionals in the Film Industry in Turkey: A Gender-Based Study

Open access


The article is based on 20 in-depth interviews with women professionals conducted for a more comprehensive study focusing on gender roles within the film and television industry in Turkey. This study examines the career possibilities for women, the experience of being a woman working in television and cinema, and the working environment, including work-life balance issues, experiences of discrimination and experiences of sexism. The hypothesis of this study is that film industry is male-dominated, and women have to struggle to be able to prove themselves in this industry in the 21st century in Turkey, where the position of women is made even more difficult by the gender role codes and the structure of Turkish society.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Bem Sandra. 1983. Gender Schema Theory and Its Implications for Child Development: Raising Gender-Aschematic Children in a Gender-Schematic Society. Signs vol. 8: 598–616.

  • Blackstone Amy. 2003. Gender Roles and Society. The University of Maine: Digital Commons@UMaine.

  • Boyce Carolyn and Palena Neale. 2006. Conducting In-Depth Interviews: A Guide for Designing and Conducting In-Depth-Interviews for Evaluation Input. Watertown: Pathfinder International.

  • Cleveland Jeanette N. and Melinda E. Kerst. 1993. Sexual Harassment and Perceptions of Power: An Under-Articulated Relationship. Journal of Vocational Behavior vol. 42 no. 1: 49–67.

  • Department of General Directorate on the Status and Problems of Women Republic of Turkey Prime Ministry. 2004. Response of the Republic Of Turkey to the Questionnaire on Implementation of the Beijing Platform for Action. Ankara.

  • Doğramacı Emel. 1992. Türkiye’de Kadının Dünü ve Bugünü [Women’s Past and Present in Turkey]. İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Yayınları.

  • Donovan Josephine. 2000 [1985]. Feminist Teory: The Intellectual Traditions. New York London: Continuum.

  • Dökmen Zehra. 2004. Toplumsal Cinsiyet: Sosyal Psikolojik Açıklamalar [Gender: Socio-Psychological Disclosures]. Ankara: Sistem Yayıncılık.

  • Erus Zeynep Ç. and Hasan Gürkan. 2012. Toplumsal Cinsiyet ve Sinemaya Yansıması: Yeniden Çekimler Aracılığıyla Japon ve Amerikan Sinemalarında Kadının Temsiline Bir Bakış [Gender and its Reflection on Cinema: A Look at the Representation of Women in Japanese and American Cinemas through Reflections]. Selçuk Communication Journal vol. 7 no. 3: 206–217.

  • European Women’s Audiovisual Network Reports 2006–2013. Last accessed 12. 01. 2019.

  • Fausto-Sterling Anne. 1993. Myths of Gender: Biological Theories about Women and Men. New York: Basic Books.

  • Fausto-Sterling Anne. 2012. Sex/Gender: Biology in a Social World. New York: Routledge.

  • Gentile Douglas. 1993. Just What Are Sex and Gender Anyway? A Call for a New Terminological Standard. Psychological Science vol. 4 no. 2: 120–122.

  • Gutek Barbara. A. 1989. Sexuality in the Workplace: Key Issues in Social Research and Organizational Practice. In The Sexuality of Organization eds. J. Hearn D. L. Sheppard P. Tancred-Sheriff and G. Burrell 56–70. London: Sage Ltd.

  • Hausmann Ricardo Laura D. Tyson and Saadia Zahidi. 2010. The Global Gender Gap Report. Geneva: World Economic Forum.

  • Hymowitz Carol and Timothy D. Schellhardt. 1986. The Glass Ceiling: Why Women Can’t Seem to Break the Invisible Barrier that Blocks them from the Top Jobs. The Wall Street Journal 24 March: 1.

  • Inter-Agency Standing Committee. 2009. IASC Policy Statement Gender Equality in Humanitarian Action. Last accessed 17. 10. 2017.

  • Jackson Robert and Meredith Newman. 2004. Sexual Harassment in the Federal Workplace Revisited: Influences on Sexual Harassment. Public Administration Review vol. 64 no. 6: 705–717.

  • Kammeyer Kenneth George Ritzer and Norman Yetman. 1997. Sociology: Experiencing Changing Societies. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

  • Kaypakoğlu Serdar. 2004. Toplumsal Cinsiyet ve Medya: Medyada Cinsiyet Stereotipleri [Gender and Media: Gender Stereotypes in the Media]. İstanbul: Naos Yay.

  • Kazgan Gülten. 1979. Türk Ekonomisinde Kadınların İşgücüne Katılması Mesleki Dağılımı Eğitim Düzeyi [Female Labor Force Participation Professional Distribution Educational Level and Socio-Economic Level]. In Sosyo-Ekonomik Düzeyi. Türkiye’de Kadın [Turkish Economy. Women in Turkey] 155–189. Ankara: Türk Sosyal Bilimler Derneği.

  • Kocacik Faruk and Veda B. Gökkaya. 2005. Türkiye’de Çalışan Kadınlar ve Sorunlar [Working Women and Problems in Turkey]. C.Ü. Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences vol. 6 no. 1: 195–219.

  • Köse Erdoğan 2013. Women Education in Turkey: A Meta Analysis Study. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science vol. 3 (Special Issue April): 98–105.

  • Lips Hilary. 1998. Sex & Gender: An Introduction. California: Mayfield.

  • Marshall Gordon. 1999. Sosyoloji Sözlüğü [Sociology Dictionary]. Ankara: Bilim ve Sanat Yay.

  • Mayers David. 1996. Social Psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • Oakley Ann. 1972. Sex Gender and Society. London: Temple Smith.

  • Öztürk-Akar Ebru. 2012. Motivations of Turkish Pre-service Teachers to Choose Teaching as a Career. Australian Journal of Teacher Education vol. 37 no. 10: 67–84

  • Rice Willy. 1996. Race Gender ‘Redlining’ and the Discriminatory Access to Loans Credit and Insurance: An Historical and Empirical Analysis of Consumers Who Sued Lenders and Insurers in Federal and State Courts 1950–1995. San Diego Law Review vol. 33. Last accessed 12. 01. 2019.

  • Rubin Gayle. 1975. The Traffic in Women: Notes on the Political Economy of Sex. New York: Monthly View Press.

  • Seger Linda 2003. When Women Call the Shots: The Developing Power and Influence of Women in Television and Film. Lincoln NE: iUniverse Publishing.

  • Tanrıöver Hülya T. 2000. Medya sektöründe kadın işgücü. Toplum ve Bilim [Women’s Labor Force in the Media Sector]. Birikim Publishing Güz [Society and Science. Fall]: 86.

  • Turkish Statistical Institute. 2015. Turkey in Statistics. Last accessed 12. 01. 2019.

  • Uggen Christopher and Amy Blackstone. 2004. Sexual Harassment as a Gendered Expression of Power. American Sociological Review no. 69: 64–92.

  • Unger Rhoda and Mary Crawford. 1993. Sex and Gender – the Troubled Relationship between Terms and Concepts. Psychological Science vol. 4 no. 2: 122–124.

  • U.S. Glass Ceiling Commission 1995. Good for Business: Making Full Use of the Nation’s Human Capital. Washington: Government Printing Office. Last accessed 12. 01. 2019.

  • Zanden James. 1990. Sociology. McGraw-Hill.

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 58 58 20
PDF Downloads 34 34 7