The Phenomenology of Trauma. Sound and Haptic Sensuality in Son of Saul

Open access


The winner of many prestigious prizes (Oscar for the best foreign language film, Grand Prize of the Cannes Film Festival, and the Golden Globe among them), the Hungarian film, Son of Saul – according to most critics – represents the Holocaust trauma in a completely new and intriguing way. The filmmakers have invented a special form in order to tackle the heroic task of showing the unwatchable, representing the unthinkable. In this essay I analyse the representational strategy of the film from a phenomenological point of view, and position it in the theoretical framework of haptic sensuality formulated by Vivian Sobchack and Laura U. Marks, among others. I mainly focus on the use of sound, in particular the role of sound design in the creation of haptic space. With the help of the analysis of the representation and artistic invocation of the different bodily senses in the film, I demonstrate how traditional artistic formal elements (characteristic of highly artistic, even experimental productions) are combined with high impact effects often present in popular film forms. I argue that the successful combination of these two factors makes the film an example of artistic immersive cinema.1

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Bonitzer Pascal. 2008 [1976]. A képmezőn kívüli tér. [The Off-Screen Space.] Apertúra vol. 3 no. 3. Last accessed 25. 11. 2016.

  • Branigan Edward. 1997. Sound Epistemology Film. In Film Theory and Philosophy eds. Richard Allen and Murray Smith 95–125. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Branigan Edward. 2010. Soundtrack in Mind. Projections vol. 4 no. 1: 41–67.

  • Chion Michel. 1994. Audio-Vision: Sound on Screen. New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Cytowic Richard E. 2002. Synesthesia: A Union of the Senses. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

  • Doane Mary Ann. 1980. The Voice in the Cinema: The Articulation of Body and Space. Yale French Studies no. 60: 33–50.

  • Dolar Mladen. 2006. A Voice and Nothing More. Cambridge MA–London: The MIT Press.

  • Elsaesser Thomas and Malte Hagener. 2010. Film Theory: An Introduction through the Senses. New York: Routledge.

  • Engelking Barbara. 2001. Holocaust and Memory. London and New York: Leicester University Press.

  • Fahlenbrach Kathrin. 2008. Emotions in Sound: Audiovisual Metaphors in the Sound Design of Narrative Films. Projections vol. 2 no. 2 (Winter): 85–103.

  • Fiske Susan T. and Shelley E. Taylor. 1991. Social Cognition 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • Herschberger Paul J. 1992. Information Loss: The Primary Psychological Trauma of the Loss of Vision. Perceptual and Motor Skills vol. 74 no. 2: 509–510.

  • Kremer S. Lillian. 2001. Women’s Holocaust Writing: Memory and Imagination. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press.

  • Marks Laura U. 2000. The Skin of the Film. Intercultural Cinema Embodiment and the Senses. Durham–London: Duke University Press.

  • Quinlivan Davina. 2012. The Place of Breath in Cinema. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

  • Recuber Tim. 2007. Immersion Cinema: The Rationalization and Reenchantment of Cinematic Space. Space and Culture vol. 10 no. 3: 315–330.

  • Robertson Lynn C. and Noam Sagiv eds. 2004. Synesthesia: Perspectives from Cognitive Neuroscience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Schaub Mirjam. 2005. Bilder aus dem Off: Zum philosophischen Stand der Kinotheorie. [Images from the Off: On the Philosophical State of Film Theory] Weimar: VDG.

  • Sobchack Vivian. 2004. Carnal Thoughts: Embodiment and Moving Image Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • Sobchack Vivian. 1992. The Address of the Eye: A Phenomenology of Film Experience. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • Williams Linda. 1991. Film Bodies: Gender Genre and Excess. Film Quarterly vol. 44 no. 4 (Summer): 2–13.

Journal information
Cited By
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 713 433 14
PDF Downloads 455 271 10