The basis of the connection between analytic philosophy and architecture theory was developed in the interwar period. The results of analytic philosophy – especially the neo-positivism of Vienna Circle – and modern, functionalist architecture theory were utilized in an interdisciplinary approach. The comparison was based on language puzzles, science-based building processes, the method of justification and verification, and designing an artificial language in order to express the theoretical (philosophical) and the practical (architectural) approach as well. The functionality was based on the modern way of architectural thinking that relied on the results of Carnapian neo-positivism. Interpreting modern architecture is possible by referring to the keywords of logical positivism: empiricism, logic, verification, unity of language, and science.
In my paper, I first list the bases of the comparison between the philosophy of the Vienna Circle and the architecture theory of the interwar period – the Bauhaus and Le Corbusier. In the 2nd and 3rd sections, I show the dialectical succession between form and function. After that, I discuss the aesthetic verification of the turn of the century and the scientific justification of the interwar period. I focus on the interwar period with the positivist approach and the theory of the ‘new architecture’. I emphasize the importance of the language of science and the machine paradigm – in contrast to historicism.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
BANHAM, Reyner. 1960. Theory and Design in the First Machine Age. London: The Architectural Press.
BOYER, M. Christine. 2011. Le Corbusier, Homme de Lettres. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
CARNAP, Rudolf. 2003. The Logical Structure of the World and Pseudoproblems in Philosophy. Chicago and La Salle, IL: Open Court.
DAHMS, Hans-Joachim. 2004. Neue Sachlichkeit in the Architecture and Philosophy of the 1920s. In: AWODEY, Steve–KLEIN, Carsten (eds), Carnap Brought Home: The View from Jena. Series: Full Circle: Publications of the Archive of Scientific Philosophy Hillman Library, University of Pittsburgh. Chicago and La Salle, IL: Open Court. 357–376.
DÜCHS, Martin. 2013. Truth or Revolution: Scrutinizing the Interaction between Morality and Architecture with the Eyes of a Moral Philosopher. In: Duyan, E.–Öztürken, C. (eds), Interactions in the History of Architecture: Proceedings of the International Conference on History of Architecture (ARCHHIST’12). May 2012, Istanbul, Turkey. 275–284.
FRAMPTON, Kenneth. 1985. Modern Architecture: A Critical History. London: Thames and Hudson.
LOOS, Adolf. 1898. Die Potemkinsche Stadt, Ver Sacrum 7: 153–156.
MALLGRAVE, Harry Francis. 2005. Modern Architectural Theory: A Historical Survey, 1673–1968. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
MOOS, Stanislaus von. 2009. Le Corbusier: Elements of a Synthesis. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers.
RICHARDSON, Alan W. 1988. Carnap’s Construction of the World: The Aufbau and the Emergence of Logical Empiricism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
SCHLICK, Moritz. 1939. Problems of Ethics. New York: Prentice Hall, Incorporated.
Vigato, Jean Claude. 2013. Between Progress and Tradition. The Regionalist Debate in France. In: Meganck, Leen–Van Santvoort, Linda–De Maeyer, Jan (eds), Regionalism and Modernity: Architecture in Western Europe, 1914–1940. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 15–38.
VOSSOUGHIAN, Nader. 2011. Otto Neurath: The Language of the Global Polis. Rotterdam: NAi Publishers.
WATKIN, David. 2001. Morality & Architecture Revisited. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.