Concepts of Citizenship in Eastern and Western Europe

Open access


The classical meaning of citizenship evokes a nation-state with a well-defined territory for its nationals, where national identity and sovereignty play a key role. Global developments are challenging the traditional nation-state and open a new stage in the history of citizenship. Transnational citizenship involving dual and multiple citizenships has become more and more accepted in Europe. Numerous scholars envisaged a post-national development where the nation-state no longer plays a key role. While scholarly research tended to focus on developments in Western Europe, a dynamic development also took place in Eastern Europe following the collapse of communism. Dual citizenship was introduced in most Eastern European countries, but its purpose was to strengthen the nation by giving the ethnic kin abroad citizenship and non-resident voting rights. In Western Europe, the right of migrants to citizenship has been expanded throughout the years in the hope that this would result in their better integration into society. Eastern Europe and Western Europe operate with different concepts of citizenship because of their diverging historical traditions and current concerns. The concept of nation and who belong to the national community play a key role in the type of citizenship that they advocate.


  • ALBERT, Mathias–JACOBSON, David–LAPID, Yosef (eds). 2001. Identities, Borders, Orders. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

  • ANDERSON, Benedict. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Verso, London.

  • ARENDT, Hannah. 1973. The Origins of Totalitarianism. Harvest/HBJ Book, San Diego–New York–London.

  • BAUBÖCK, Rainer. 2003. Towards a Political Theory of Migrant Transnationalism. International Migration Review 37: 700–723.

  • BAUBÖCK, Rainer.2005. Expansive Citizenship: Voting beyond Territory and Membership. Political Science and Politics 38(4): 683–687.

  • BAUBÖCK, Rainer.2007. Stakeholder Citizenship and Transnational Political Participation: a Normative Evaluation of External Voting. 75 Fordham L. Rev. 2393. Available at:

  • BÁRDI, Nándor. 2004. Tény és való [Fact and Reality]. Kalligram, Pozsony [Bratislava].

  • BÁRDI, Nándor. 2013. Nemzetstratégiáról, külhoni magyarságról, „táposokról” [About National Strategy, Hungarians Abroad, ‘Feeders’]. Source: September 1 2013. Accessed on: 13 January 2015.

  • BENHABIB, Seyla. 2004. The Rights of Others: Aliens, Residents and Citizens. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  • BLATTER, Joachim. 2010. Dual Citizenship for Ethnic Minorities with Neighbouring Kin States. In: BAUBÖCK, Rainer (ed.), Dual Citizenship for Transborder Minorities? How to Respond to the Hungarian-Slovak Tit-For-Tat. European University Institute Working Paper, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, RSCAS 2010/75.

  • BLOKKER, Paul–KOVÁCS, Krisztina. 2015. Hungarian Citizenship and Franchise Politics and Their Effects on the Hungarian-Romanian Relations. In: BASHESKA, Elena–KOCHENOV, Dimitry (eds), The Principle of Good Neighbourly Relations in Europe: Theory and Practice. Brill/Nijhoff, Leiden.

  • BODEMANN, Y. Michal–YURDAKUL, Gökçe (eds). 2006. Migration, Citizenship, Ethnos. Palgrave Macmillan, New York.

  • BLOEMRAAD, Irene–KORTEWEG, Anna–YURDAKUL, Gökçe. 2008. Citizenship and Immigration: Multiculturalism, Assimilation, and Challenges to the Nation-State. The Annual Review of Sociology 34: 153–179.

  • BOSNIAK, Linda. 2003. Multiple Nationality and the Postnational Transformation of Citizenship. In: MARTIN, David–HAILBRONNER, Kay (eds), Rights and Duties of Dual Nationals. Evolution and Prospects. Kluwer Law International, The Hague–London–New York, 27–48.

  • BRUBAKER, Rogers. 1992a. Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

  • BRUBAKER, Rogers. 1992b. Citizenship Struggles in Soviet Successor States. International Migration Review 26(2): 269–291.

  • BRUBAKER, Rogers. 1996. Nationalism Reframed. Nationhood and the National Question in the New Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  • BÚR-BAKY, Miklós. 2005. Az alkotmány őre [The Guard of the Constitution]. Magyar Narancs 35: 172–173.

  • CULIC, Irina. 2003. State Building and Constitution Writing in Central and Eastern Europe after 1989. Regio 1(3): 38–58.

  • CULIC, Irina. 2006. Dilemmas of Belonging: Hungarians from Romania. Nationalities Papers 2(34): 175–200.

  • CULIC, Irina. 2009. Dual Citizenship Policies in Central and Eastern Europe. Working Papers in Romanian Minority Studies 15: 5–32.

  • CSERGŐ, Zsuzsa. Hungary’s Trans-Sovereign Project (Ten Years After). 7 July 2011. Accessed on: 14 January 2016.

  • CSERGŐ, Zsuzsa–GOLDGEIER, James M. 2006. Virtual Nationalism in Comparative Context: How Unique Is the Hungarian Approach? 21st Century COE Program Slavic Eurasian Studies 9.

  • CSERGŐ, Zsuzsa–GOLDGEIER, James M. 2006. Beyond Sovereignty: from Status Law to Transnational Citizenship? Osamu Ieda Slavic Research Center. Accessed on: 14 January 2016.

  • DAALDER, Hans. 1974. Review: The Consociational Democracy Theme. World Politics 26(4): 604–621.

  • EGEDY, Gergely. 2001. Konzervativizmus az ezredfordulón [Conservatism at the Turn of the Millennium]. Magyar Szemle Könyvek, Budapest, 174–181.

  • EGEDY, Gergely. 2013. Conservatism and Nation Models in Hungary. Hungarian Review 3.

  • EGEDY, Gergely. 2016. A multikulturalizmus vége? [The End of Multiculturalism?]. Kommentár 2: 73–86.

  • EGRY, Gábor. 2010. Otthonosság és idegenség [Feelings of Homeliness and Strangeness]. Napvilág Kiadó, Budapest.

  • FAIST, Thomas. 2009. The Transnational Social Question – Social Rights and Citizenship in a Global Context. International Sociology 24(1): 7–35.

  • FAIST, Thomas–KIVISTO, Peter (eds). 2008. Dual Citizenship in Global Perspective. From Unitary to Multiple Citizenship. Palgrave Macmillan, London.

  • FREY, Bruno S. 2003. Flexible Citizenship for a Global Society. Politics, Philosophy & Economics 2(1): 93–114.

  • FURIA, Peter A. 2005. Global Citizenship, Anyone? Cosmopolitanism, Privilege and Public Opinion. Global Society 19(4): 331–359.

  • GELLNER, Ernest. 1983. Nations and Nationalism. Cornell University Press, Ithaca–London.

  • GREENFELD, Liah. 1992. Nationalism: Five Roads to Modernity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge–London.

  • GYURGYÁK, János. 2007. Ezzé lett magyar hazátok. A magyar nemzeteszme és nacionalizmus története [This Happened to Your Homeland. The History of the Concept of the Hungarian Nation and Nationalism]. Osiris, Budapest.

  • HABERMAS, Jürgen. 1995. Citizenship and National Identity: Some Reflections on the Future of Europe. In: BEINER, Ronald (ed.), Theorizing Citizenship. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY, 155–282.

  • HANSEN, Randall. 2009. The Poverty of Postnationalism: Citizenship, Immigration, and the New Europe. Theory & Society 1(38): 1–24.

  • HARRIS, Erika. 2009. Nationalism Theories and Cases. Edinburgh University Press.

  • HELD, David. 1995. Democracy and the Global Order. From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance. Stanford University Press, Stanford

  • HOBSBAWM, Eric. 1992. Nations and Nationalism since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  • HROCH, Miroslav. 1985. Social Preconditions of National Revival in Europe: a Comparative Analysis of the Social Composition of Patriotic Groups among the Smaller European Nations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  • JOPPKE, Christian. 1999. Immigration and the Nation State. The United States, Germany, and Great Britain. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

  • JOPPKE, Christian. 2005. Selecting by Origin. Ethnic Migration in the Liberal State. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

  • JOPPKE, Christian. 2006. Citizenship between Re- and De-ethnicization. In: BODEMANN, Y. Michal–YURDAKUL, Gökçe (eds), Migration, Citizenship, Ethnos. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 63–94.

  • KÁNTOR, Zoltán. 2014. A nemzet intézményesülése a rendszerváltás utáni Magyarországon [The Institutionalization of the Nation in Hungary after the change of Regime]. Osiris, Budapest.

  • KISS, Tamás. 2015. Defining the Nation. Citizenship Policies, Classificatory Struggles and Discourses Crosscutting the Idea of National Reunification in Hungary and Romania. Manuscript.

  • KOHN, Hans. 1944. The Idea of Nationalism. A Study in Its Origin and Background. Macmillan, London.

  • KOSLOWSKI, Rey. 2000. Demographic Boundary Maintenance in World Politics. In: ALBERT, Mathias–JACOBSON, David–LAPID, Yosef (eds), Identities, Borders, Orders. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

  • KYMLICKA, Will–OPALSKI, Magda (eds). 2001. Can Liberal Pluralism Be Exported? Western Political Theory and Ethnic Relations in Eastern Europe. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

  • LEGGEWIE, Claus. 2013. Transnational Citizenship Ideals and European Realities.

  • LIJPHART, Arend. 2004. Constitutional Design for Divided Societies. Journal of Democracy 15(2): 96–109.

  • LINZ, Juan–STEPAN, Alfred. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.

  • MEINECKE, Friedrich. 1962. Weltbürgertum und Nationalstaat: Studien zur Genesis des deutschen Nationalstaates. Oldenburg, Munich.

  • NELL, Liza M. 2004. Conceptualising the emergence of immigrants’ transnational communities. Migration Letters 1: 50–56.

  • ÖLLÖS, László. 2006. Nemzet és külpolitika. Magyar Kisebbség 10(41–42): 165–185.

  • ØSTERGAARD-NIELSEN, Eva K. 2003. The politics of migrants’ transnational political practices. International Migration Review 37(3): 760–786.

  • PAPP Z., Attila. 2014. Kisebbségi identitáskonstrukciók [Minority Identity Constructions]. REGIO 22(1): 118–155.

  • POGGE, T. W. 1997. Migration and Poverty. In: V. Bader (ed.), Citizenship and Exclusion. St. Martin’s Press, New York, 12–27.

  • POGONYI, Szabolcs. 2011. Multiple Citizenship, Multiple Dilemmas. In: Revue Regard sur l’Est. Dossier #59 «Citoyenneté et Nationalité à l’Est». Source: Accessed on: 14 January 2016.

  • POGONYI, Szabolcs. 2015. Transborder Kin-Minority as Symbolic Resource in Hungary. Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe 14(3): 73–98.

  • SCHÖPFLIN, György. 2003. A modern nemzet [The Modern Nation]. Attraktor, Gödöllő-Máriabesnyő.

  • SHORE, Cris. 2004. Whither European Citizenship? Eros and Civilization Revisited. European Journal of Social Theory 7(1): 27–44.

  • SPIRO, Peter J. 2010 Dual Citizenship as Human Right. International Journal of Constitutional Law 8(1): 111–130.

  • SZABÓ, Marcel. 2013. A többes állampolgárság – új nemzetközi és uniós perspektívák felé? [The Multicitizenship – Towards New International and Union Perspective]. Állam- és Jogtudomány LIV(1–2): 125–145. Source:

  • SZÉKELY, István. 2014. Dynamics of Party Politics, Electoral Competition and Cooperation within the Hungarian Minorities of Romania, Serbia and Slovakia (PhD thesis).

  • MABRY, Tristan James–MCGARRY, John–MOORE, Margaret–O’LEARY, Brendan (eds). 2013. Divided Nations and European Integration. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.

  • WEIL, Patrick. 2011. From Conditional to Secured and Sovereign: the New Strategic Link between the Citizen and the Nation-State in a Globalized World. International Journal of Constitutional Law 9(3–4): 615–635.

Journal Information


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 80 80 63
PDF Downloads 20 20 17