Minority rights instruments have been traditionally applied to old minority groups. This paper examines to what extent these same instruments are conceptually meaningful to the integration of new minorities stemming from migration. The conviction that minority groups, irrespective of their being old or new minorities, have some basic common claims that can be subsumed under a common definition does not mean that all minority groups have all the same rights and legitimate claims: some have only minimum rights, while others have or should be granted more substantial rights; some can legitimately put forward certain claims – not enforceable rights – that need to be negotiated with the majority, while others should not. In order to devise a common but differentiated set of rights and obligations for old and new minority groups, it is essential to analyse the differences and similarities of both categories of minorities, their claims, needs, and priorities; in this way, it will be possible to delineate a catalogue of rights that can be demanded by and granted to different minority groups. Studying the interaction between traditional minorities and migrants or old and new minority groups is a rather new task because so far these topics have been studied in isolation from each other. It is also an important task for future research in Europe since many states have established systems for the rights of old minorities but have not as yet developed sound policies for the integration of new minority groups stemming from migration.
ACFC (Advisory Committee of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities). 2001a. Opinion on the United Kingdom, 30 November, ACFC/INF/OP/I(2002)006.
ACFC (Advisory Committee of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities). 2001b. Opinion on Austria, 16 May, ACFC/INF/OP/I/009.
ACFC (Advisory Committee of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities). 2002a. Opinion on Germany, 1 March, ACFC/INF/OP/I/008.
ACFC (Advisory Committee of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities). 2002b. Opinion on Ukraine, 1 March, ACFC/INF/OP/I/010.2004b, Second Report submitted by Finland, 10 December, ACFC/SR/II(2004)012 (Art. 3).
ACFC (Advisory Committee of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities). 2004a. Opinion on BiH, 27 May, ACFC/INF/OP/I(2005)003.
ÅKERMARK, Sia Spiliopoulou. 2007. Shifts in the Multiple Justifications of Minority Protection. In: BLOED, Arie–HOFMANN, Rainier–MARKO, Joseph–MAYALL, James–PACKER, John–WELLER, Marc (eds), European Yearbook on Minority Issues 7(8).
BAUBÖCK, Rainer. 1994. The Integration of Immigrants. Report of the 7th Meeting of the Joint Group of Specialists on Migration, Demography and Employment, Council of Europe, Strasbourg, 15–17 March 1994, CDMG(94) 25.
CAPOTORTI, Francesco. 1977. Study on the Rights of Persons Belonging to Ethnic, Religious and Linguistic Minorities, UN Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/384/Rev.1.
EIDE, Asbjørn. 1993. Protection of Minorities. Report submitted to the UN Sub-Commission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities, Forty-fifth session, 10 August 1993, UN Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/1993/34.
EIDE, Asbjørn. 2000. Commentary to the UN Declaration on the Rights of Persons Belonging to National or Ethnic, Religious and Linguistic Minorities. Working paper submitted to the UN Working Group on Minorities, Sixth session, 22–26 May 2000, UN Doc., E/CN.4/Sub.2/AC.5/2000/WP.1.
EKÉUS, Rolf. 2006. Statement to the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly. Fifth Annual Winter Meeting, Vienna, 23 February 2006, HCNM.GAL/3/06.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (Venice Commission). 2007. Report on Non-Citizens and Minority Rights, CDL-AD(2007)001, 18 January 2007.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. 2005. A Common Agenda for Integration. Framework for the Integration of Third-Country Nationals in the European Union, 1 September, COM(2005) 389.
EUROSTAT. May 2015. Migration and Migrant Population Statistics. At: <http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Migration_and_migrant_population_statistics>.
ECtHR. 1989. Kamasinski v. Austria. Judgment of 19 December, Series A, No. 168.
ECtHR.2001. Cyprus v. Turkey, Appl. No. 25781/94, judgment of 10 May.
ECtHR.2006. Kalifatstaat v. Germany. Appl. No 13828/4, decision on the admissibility of 11 December.
EU. 2004. Directive Concerning the Status of Third-Country Nationals Who Are Long-Term Residents. OJC 109, 23 January.
FCNM (Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities). 1995a. List of Declarations, Declaration by Germany. Dated 11 May 1995 and renewed on 10 September 1997. http://conventions.coe.int.
FCNM (Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities). 1995b. Explanatory Report of the FCNM. http://conventions.coe.int.
FCNM (Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities). 1997. List of Declarations. Declaration by Estonia dated 6 January 1997. http://conventions.coe.int.
HOFMANN, Rainer. 2006. The Impact of International Norms on the Protection of National Minorities in Europe: The Added Value and Essential Role of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities (Council of Europe Document DH-MIN(2006)18).
HOFMANN, Rainer. 2004. The Framework Convention at the End of the First Cycle of Monitoring. In: Council of Europe (ed.), Filling the Frame. Five Years of Monitoring the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities (Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg).
HRC. 1994. General Comment No 23. The Rights of Minorities (Art. 27). CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.5, 8 April.
IOM. 2015. World Migration Report 2015. Geneva.
KYMLICKA, Will. 1997. States, Nations and Cultures. Spinoza Lectures, University of Amsterdam, Van Gorcum, Assen.
KYMLICKA, Will. 2001. Politics in the Vernacular, Nationalism, Multiculturalism, and Citizenship. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
KYMLICKA, Will. 2007. Multicultural Odysseys. Navigating the New International Politics of Diversity. Oxford University Press, Oxford–New York.
Kymlicka, Will–OPALSKI, Magda (eds). 2001. Can Liberal Pluralism be Exported? Western Political Theory and Ethnic Relations in Eastern Europe. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
MARKO, Joseph. 1997. Equality and Difference: Political and Legal Aspects of Ethnic Group Relations. In: Franz Matscher (ed.), Vienna International Encounter on Some Current Issues Regarding the Situation of National Minorities. N. P. Engel Verlag, Kehl, Strasbourg, Arlington.
MEDDA-WINDISCHER, Roberta. 2009. Old and New Minorities. Reconciling Diversity and Cohesion. Nomos Publisher, Baden-Baden.
MEDDA-WINDISCHER, Roberta. 2010. Changing Paradigms in the Traditional Dichotomy of Old and New Minorities. In: Henrard, Kristin (ed.), Double Standards Pertaining to Minority Protection. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden.
MURRAY, John. 1997. Should Immigrants or Roma and Sinti be Regarded as Minorities? In: Matscher, Franz (ed.), Vienna International Encounter on Some Current Issues regarding the Situation of National Minorities. N. P. Engel Verlag, Kehl, Strasbourg, Arlington.
OSCE High Commissioner on National Minorities. 2006. Policies on Integration and Diversity in Some OSCE Participating States. Exploratory study prepared by the Migration Policy Group, HCNM.GAL/6/06, 3 July.
UNHCR. 2015. Global Appeal 2015 Update. At: http://www.unhcr.org/ga15/index.xml.
WALZER, Michael. 1995. Pluralism: a Political Perspective. In: Kymlicka, Will (ed.), The Rights of Minority Cultures. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
WHEATLEY, Steven. 2003. Deliberative Democracy and Minorities. European Journal of International Law 14(3): 507–527.