Genotype-by-environment interaction and yield stability analysis in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) genotypes in North Shewa, Ethiopia

Open access

Abstract

A multi-environment sorghum variety trial comprised of nine genotypes along with one standard check, “yeju”, was carried out in the main cropping seasons of the period of 2006–2008. The objective of this research was to identify a stable and better-yielding sorghum variety under the conditions of the sorghum-growing area of North Shewa, Ethiopia. The experiment was arranged in randomized complete block design replicated three times within an experiment. AMMI analysis based on grain yield data revealed that genotypes ICSV 1112BF, 82 LPYT-2 # 5x81ESIP 46, and PGRC/E #222880 were superior to the standard check both in grain yield and stability, and hence these genotypes have been verified, and the genotype PGRC/E #222880 has been registered by the national variety-releasing technical and standing committee by the given name “Chare” for commercial production for the North Shewa sorghum-growing areas.

[1] CSA (Central Statistical Agency), Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia. (2015/16), Agricultural sample survey report on area and production of crops, volume II. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

[2] Dewar, J. (2003), Influence of malting on sorghum grain protein. CSIR. Environmental. Longman scientific and technical Co. Ltd. 200–209.

[3] Steel, R. G. D., Torie, J. H. (1980), Principles and procedure of statistics. A biometrical approach. N. Y.: McGraw-Hill, 195–233.

[4] IRRI 2005. IRRISTAT for Windows ver. 5.0. Philippines: Metro Manila.

[5] Finlay, K. W., Wilkinson, G. N. (1963), The analysis of adaptation in plant breeding programmes. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 14, 742–754.

[6] Nachit, M. M., Sorrels, M. E., Zobel, R. W., Gauch, H. G., Fisher, R. A., Coffman, W. R. (1992-II), Association of environmental variables with sites’ mean grain yield and components of GEI in durum wheat. J. Genet. Breed. 46, 369–372.

[7] Muhe, K., Assefa, A. (2011), Genotypes X environment interaction in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivar development in Ethiopia. Int. Res. J. Plant Sci. 2(10), 317–322. ISSN: 2141-5447.

[8] Gedif, M., Yigzaw, D. (2014), GEI analysis for tuber yield of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) using a GGE biplot method in Amhara Region, Ethiopia. Agricultural Sciences 5, 239–249. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/as.2014.54027.

[9] Adugna, A., Tesso, T. Degu, E., Tadesse, T., Merga, F., Legesse, W. Tirfessa, A., Kidane, H. Wole, A., Daba, C. (2011), Genotype-by-environment interaction and yield stability analysis in finger millet (Elucine coracana L. Gaertn) in Ethiopia. American Journal of Plant Sciences 2, 408–415. doi:10.4236/ajps.2011.23046.

[10] Kang, M. S., Gauch, H. G. (eds). (1996), Cultivar-by-environment interaction. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

[11] Piepho, H. P. (1998), Methods for comparing the yield stability of cropping systems – a rev. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 180, 193–213.

[12] Yan, W., Hant, L. A., Qinglai, S., Szalvincs, Z. (2000), Cultivar evaluation and megaenvironment investigation based on the GGE Biplot. Crop Science 40, 597–605. http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2000.403597x.

[13] Gauch, H. G. (1988), Model selection and validation for yield trials with interaction. Biometrics 44: 705–715.

[14] Zobel, R. W., Wright, M. J., Gauch, H. G. (1988), Statistical analysis of a yield trial. Agronomy Journal 80, 388–393.

[15] Crossa, J., Gauch, H. G., Zobel, R. W. (1990), Additive main effect and multiplicative interaction analysis of two international maize cultivar trials. Crop Science 30, 493–500.

[16] Nida, H., Seyoum, A., Gebreyohannes, A. (2016), Evaluation of yield performance of intermediate altitude sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) genotypes using Genotype x Environment Interaction Analysis and GGE Biplot in Ethiopia. International Journal of Trend in Research and Development 3(2), 27–35. ISSN: 2394-9333.

[17] Adugna, A. (2008), Assessment of yield stability in sorghum using univariate and multivariate statistical approaches. Hereditas 145, 28–37.

[18] Duarte, J. B., Vencovsky, R. (1999), Genotype × environment interaction: an introduction to AMMI analysis [Interação genótipos × ambientes: uma introdução à análise AMMI]. Sociedade Brasileira de Genética, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.

[19] de Oliveira, E. J., de Freitas, J. P. X., de Jesus, O. N. (2014), AMMI analysis of the adaptability and yield stability of yellow passion fruit varieties. Sci. Agric. 71(2), 139–145.

[20] Verma, R. P. S., Kharab, A. S., Singh, J., Kumar, V., Sharma, I., Verma, A. (2016), AMMI model to analyse GxE for dual purpose barley in multi-environment trials. Agric. Sci. Digest. 36(1), 9–16.

[21] Purchase, J. L., Hatting, H., Vandeventer, C. S. (2000), Genotype × environment interaction of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in South Africa. II. Stability analysis of yield performance. South African Journal of Plant and Soil 17, 101–107.

Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Agriculture and Environment

The Journal of "Sapientia" Hungarian University of Transylvania

Journal Information

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 246 246 38
PDF Downloads 72 72 27