Landscape function analysis as a base of landscape visions

Open access


An essential condition for the success of rural areas is the harmonious enforcement of ecologic, economic, and other educational, cultural, aesthetic goods/services of landscape, diversity of landscape functions. Landscape function analysis is a useful tool for the complex evaluation of rural regions. Using statistic and spatial data, we explored the landscape resources, potentials, and limitations of two pilot regions. But what about the future? Based on the landscape function analysis, we have defined special types of regions/landscape visions according to the long-term ability to retain population by the comparison of economic, production, and habitat value of the landscape.


  • [1] Bastian, O., Krönert, R., and Lipský, Z. (2006), Landscape diagnosis on different space and time scales – A challenge for landscape planning. Landscape Ecology 21(3), 359–374.

  • [2] de Groot, R., Hein, L. (2007), Concept and valuation of landscape functions at different scales. In: Mander, Ü., Wiggering, H., Helming, K. (eds), Multifunctional land use. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer, 15–36.

  • [3] Willemen, L., Hein, L., van Mensvoort, M. E. F.; Verburg, P. H. (2010), Space for people, plants, and livestock? Quantifying interactions among multiple landscape functions in a Dutch rural region. Ecological Indicators 10, 62–73.

  • [4] Costanza, R., Arge d’, R., Groot de, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O’Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R. G., Sutton, P., Belt van den, M. (1997), The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387, 253–260.

  • [5] de Groot, R. S. (1992), Functions of nature: Evaluation of nature in environmental planning, management and decision making. Wolters-Noordhoff, Groningen.

  • [6] de Groot, R. (2006), Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 75, 175–186.

  • [7] MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) (2005), Ecosystems and human well-being: Biodiversity synthesis. World Resource Institute, Washington D.C.

  • [8] Bastian, O. (1997), Gedanken zur Bewertung von Landschaftsfunktionen – unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Habitatfunktion, Schnevedingen, Germany: Alfred Toepfer Akademie für Naturschutz.

  • [9] OECD (2007), OECD Regions at a Glance: 2007 Edition. OECD Publishing, Paris.

  • [10] Gómez-Sal A., Belmontes J.-A., Nicolau J.-M. (2003), Assessing landscape values: a proposal for a multidimensional conceptual model. Ecological modelling 168, 319–341.

  • [11] Koschke, L., Fürst, C., Frank, S., Makeschin, F. (2012), A multi-criteria approach for an integrated land-cover-based assessment of ecosystem services provision to support landscape planning. Ecological Indicators 21, 54–66.

  • [12] Kollányi L. (2004), Táji indikátorok alkalmazási lehetőségei a környezetállapot értékeléséhez. BKAE Tájtervezési és Területfejlesztési Tanszék, Budapest.

  • [13] Daniel, T. C. (2001), Whiter scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning 54, 267–282.

  • [14] Ehrlich, P. R., and Ehrlich, A. H. (1981), Interaction among landscape elements: A core of landscape ecology. New York: Random House.

  • [15] Swanwick, C. (2002), Landscape character assessment. Guidance for England and Scotland. Scottish Natural Heritage and Countryside Agency, Cheltenham and Edinburgh.

  • [16] de Groot, R. S., Wilson, M., Boumans, R. (2002), A typology for the description, classification and valuation of ecosystem functions. Goods Services Econ. 41(3), 393–408.

  • [17] Gobster, P. H. (1999), An ecological aesthetic for forest landscape management. Landscape Journal 18(1), 54–64.

Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Agriculture and Environment

The Journal of "Sapientia" Hungarian University of Transylvania

Journal Information


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 17 17 17
PDF Downloads 19 19 19