Legibility is urban quality, defining ability to find a way in urban or architectural structure, as well as understanding the identity or function of a certain space. Legible environment could help to comprehend not only the space in which person is in a given situation, but also the whole city. It helps to identify oneself as part of a group or certain community. The article is oriented to better understanding of people’s needs in environment, by analyzing the case study of Kaunas New Town. The project is based on observation, analysis of literature and results of research by space syntax methodology. The results show coherence between design rules, based on people’s needs, and visibility graph model, which shows the potential of public and private spaces.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
1. Lynch K.The Image of the City. Cambridge: The M.I.T Press 1960. 208 p.
2. Benjamin W.The Arcades Project. Cambridge: Belknap Press 2002. 1088 p.
3. Alexander C. Ishikawa S. Silverstein M. Jacobson M. Fiks-dahl-King I. Angel S.Pattern Language: Towns Buildings Construction. New York: Oxford University Press 1977. 1171 p.
4. Ostwald M. J. Vaughan J.Fractal dimension of architecture. 2016. 423 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32426-5
5. Carmona M. Heath T. Oc T. Tiesdell S. Public Places – Urban Spaces. Oxford: Architectural Press 2003. 394 p.
6. Gehl J.Cities for People (1st Edition). Washington: Island Press; 2010. 288 p.
7. Kaplan S. Aesthetics Affect and Cognition Environmental Preference from an Evolutionary Perspective. Environment and Behavior 1987 Vol. 19 No. 1 pp. 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916587191001
8. Kaplan R. Kaplan S. Brown T. Environmental Preference: A Comparison of Four Domains of Predictors. Environment and Behavior SAGE Journals September 1989 Vol. 21 No. 5 pp. 509–530. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916589215001
9. Csikszentmihalyi M.Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper and Row 1990. 336 p.
10. Zaleckis K. Matijošaitienė I. Hidden urban revolution in Kaunas downtown area: 1935–1988–2011. Proceedings: Eighth International Space Syntax Symposium. Edited by M. Greene J. Reyes and A. Castro. Santiago de Chile: PUC 87. 2012. pp. 8227:1–8227:16.
11. Turner A. Doxa M. O’Sullivan D. Penn A. From isovists to visibility graphs: a methodology for the analysis of architectural space. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2001 Vol. 28 pp. 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1068/b2684
12. Tahar B. Brown F. The visibility graph: An approach for the analysis of traditional domestic M’zabite spaces. Proceedings: 4th International Space Syntax Symposium London 2003. Held at UCL Vol. II p. 56.
13. Zaleckis K. Role of the urban green structure in creation of preferred urban environment. COST C 11 Green structures and urban planning 2003 pp. 249–255.
14. Wiener J. M. Franz G. Rossmanith N. Reichelt A. Mallot H. A. Bulthoff H. H. Isovist analysis captures properties of space relevant for locomotion and experience. ISSN 1468-4233 Perception 2007 Vol. 36 pp. 1066–1083. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5587
15. Hölscher C. Meilinger T. Vrachliotis G. Brösamle M.&Knauff M. Finding the Way Inside: Linking Architectural Design Analysis and Cognitive Processes. (Editors: C. Freksa M. Knauff B. Krieg-Brückner B.. Nebel&T. Barkowsky) Spatial Cognition IV - Reasoning Action Interaction. International Conference Spatial Cognition 2004 Vol. 3343 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin: Springer. pp. 1–23.
16. Shokouhi M. Legible cities: The role of visual clues and pathway configuration in legibility of cities. 4th International Space Syntax Symposium London 2003. pp. 71.1–71.14.
17. Kim Y. O.&Penn A. Linking the Spatial Syntax of Cognitive Maps To the Spatial Syntax of the Environment. Environment&Behavior 2004 Vol. 36 Issue 4 pp. 483–507. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916503261384