Bus shelters, which form a part of daily lives of people, generally provide service as small areas of urban space created for short-term periods of waiting. From the perspective of spatial design, it is important that an environment of good quality is provided for users of bus-shelters. This study proposed hypotheses to research how the physical design of bus shelters (location-accessibility, anthropometric characteristics, roofing and walls, lighting, electronic information, seating, etc.) affected general satisfaction of their users. To establish users’ general satisfaction, direct observation was performed and the hypotheses were tested through surveys conducted at bus-shelters selected in two areas of Istanbul (Ataköy-Beşyol) with different economic levels, and an assessment was made of the users’ satisfaction analyses and related problems of bus shelter design. In the conclusion, it was established that there is a significant correlation between general satisfaction and, among other things, the perceived degree of difficulty in getting on and off buses, the harmonization of bus shelter design with the surroundings, the adequacy of a shelter for summer use, the comfort of a shelter, the adequacy of seating, and the extent to which the shelter is maintained.
8. Gattis J. L.Guide for the geometric design of driveways. Transportation Research Board 2010 32 p.
9. Grava S.Urban transportation systems. Choices for communities. 2003 [online cited 22.05.2018]. http://www.tfl.gov.uk/assets/downloads/businessandpartners/accessibile_bus_stop_design_guidance.pdf 2004.
10. Pecheux K. K. Guidebook for mitigating fixed-route bus-and-pedestrian collisions. Transportation Research Board 2008. 65 p.
11. Zhang K. J. Bus Stop Urban Design: Nine Techniques for Enhancing Bus Stops and Neighbourhoods and their Application in Metro Vancouver B. Environment Design Master Thesis The University of British Columbia. 2012.
12. Foothill Goldline [online]. Bus Stop Location and Design CriteriaChapter 3 | Proposed Bus/RAIL INTERFACE FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS Foothill Extension Bus Interface Plan [cited 22.05.2018]. http://foothill-goldline.org/images/uploads/Chapter%203_DRAFT.pdf.
13. GMPTE. Greater Manchester Passenger Transport Executive Design Guidelines for Bus Stops in Greater Manchester Manchester 2007 [online cited 22.05.2018]. http://chennaicityconnect.com/knowledgebase/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/manchester-bus-design-guideline.pdf
14. Septa Bus Stop Design Guidelines. City of Philadelphia Bucks County Chester County Delaware County Montgomery County 2012 [online cited 22.05.2018]. https://septa.org/strategic-plan/reports/SEPTA-Bus-Stop-Design-Guidelines-2012.pdf
20. Bus Shelter Policy 2001 [online]. Holroyd City [cited 22.05.2018]. http://www.holroyd.nsw.gov.au/PDFs/Your%20Council/Policies/Roads%20and%20Infrastucture/Bus%20Shelter%20Policy%20.pdf
21. Tysons Corner Urban Design Guidelines A Fairfax County Virginia 2012 [online]. Urban Design Guidelines Advisory Group [cited 22.05.2018]. publicationhttp://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/tysons/design/download/tysons_udg.pdf
23. Orange in roof and claw (Bus shelter by Peter Eisenman Aachen Germany) [online cited 22.05.2018]. https://thebeautyoftransport.com/2014/04/02/orange-in-roof-and-claw-bus-shelter-by-peter-eisenmanaachen-germany/
24. Strategic Planning Services and Infrastructure Management Services. Transport Stops Shelters and Seating [online]. The City of Newcastle [cited 22.05.2018]. https://www.newcastle.nsw.gov.au/getmedia/a2df7bc4-28a0-41d2-b836-110ad11d63c5/Transport_stops_shelters_seating.aspx
25. Chien S. I. Qin Zh. Optimization of bus stop locations for improving transit accessibility. Transportation planning and Technology 2004 Vol. 27 Issue 3 pp. 211–227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0308106042000226899
26. Loukaitou-Sideris A. Hot spots of bus stop crime: The importance of environmental attributes. Journal of the American Planning association 1999 Vol. 65 Issue 4 pp. 395–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369908976070
27. Hart T. C. Miethe T. D. Street robbery and public bus stops: a case study of activity nodes and situational risk. Security Journal 2014 Vol. 27 Issue 2 pp. 180–193. https://doi.org/10.1057/sj.2014.5
28. Ibeas Á. et al. Optimizing bus stop spacing in urban areas. Transportation research part E: logistics and transportation review 2010 Vol. 46 Issue 3 pp. 446–458. http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/1731-03
29. Liggett R. Loukaitou-Sideris A. Iseki H. Bus stop-environment connection: do characteristics of the built environment correlate with bus stop crime? Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2001 Vol. 1760 pp. 20–27. https://doi.org/10.3141/1760-03
30. Ewing R. Using a visual preference survey in transit design. Public Works Management & Policy 2001 Vol. 5 Issue 4 pp. 270–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724X0154002
31. Law Ph. Taylor B. Shelter from the storm: Optimizing distribution of bus stop shelters in Los Angeles. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2001 Vol. 1753 pp. 79–85.
32. Fitzpatrick K. et al.TCRP Report 19: Guidelines for the Location and Design of Bus Stops. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies Washington DC 1996. 222 p. ISBN 0-309-06050-8 [online cited 22.05.2018]. https://nacto.org/docs/usdg/tcrp_report_19.pdf
33. Broome K. et al. Evaluation of flexible route bus transport for older people. Transport Policy 2012 Vol. 21 pp. 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.02.005
34. Woldeamanuel M. Somers A. When the Wait seems Longer: Assessing Quality Attributes of Bus Stops. TRB 95th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers 2016. 17 p. [online cited 22.05.2018]. http://docs.trb.org/prp/16-0446.pdf
35. Buys L. Miller E. Conceptualising convenience: Transportation practices and perceptions of inner-urban high density residents in Brisbane Australia. Transport Policy 2011 Vol. 18 Issue 1 pp. 289–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.08.012
36. Pizzato G. Guimarães L. Caten C. The perception of pleasantness in a product of collective use : the bus shelter. Work 2012 Vol. 41.Supplement 1 pp. 282–289 [cited 22.05.2018]. https://content.iospress.com/download/work/wor0170?id=work%2Fwor0170https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2012-0170-282
37. Ely V. H. M. B. De Oliveira J. M. Lodgsdon L. A bus stop shelter evaluated from the user’s perspective. Work 2012 Vol. 41.Supplement 1 pp. 1226–1233. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2012-0307-1226
38. Nabors D. et al.Pedestrian road safety audit guidelines and prompt lists. Washington DC U.S. Dept. of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Office of Safety 2007 128 p.
39. Nikolopoulou M. Kleissl J. Linden P.F. Lykoudis S. Pedestrians’ perception of environmental stimuli through field surveys: Focus on particulate pollution. Science of the total environment 2011 Vol. 409 Issue 13 pp. 2493–2502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.02.002
40. Pereira D.A.G. Faria B.M.A. Goncalves R.A.M. Carvalho V.B.F. Prata K.O. Saraiva P.S. Navarro T.P. Cunha-Filho I. Relação entre força muscular e capacidade funcional em pacientes com doença arterial obstrutiva periférica: um estudo piloto. Jornal Vascular Brasileiro 2011 Vol. 10 Issue 1 pp. 26–30 [online cited 22.05.2018]. http://www.scielo.br/pdf/jvb/v10n1/v10n1a05.pdf
41. Iseki H. Ringler A. Taylor B.D. Miller M. and Smart M.Evaluating Transit Stops and Stations from the Perspective of Transit Users 2007 [online cited 22.05.2018]. https://www.its.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2014/06/Appendix-C.pdf