Introduction: The concept of empathy has been described in many ways by researchers. According to some, it is the basic cognitive function or ability of being aware of others’ thoughts and feelings. Empathy refers to being able to respond to emotions, sharing the feelings of individuals, and reflecting them as if in a mirror. It also helps to establish good relationships with people, to understand them, and share their feelings. The use of empathy in the classroom, especially in life skills courses help students to make connections between school and everyday life.
Methods: This study aimed to investigate how an empathy-based education programme implemented in the life skills teaching course affected the empathy skills of prospective classroom teachers in Turkey. For this purpose, using a mixed-methods research design, the participant prospective classroom teachers received empathy-based education programme 12 class hours. The data collection tools used in the study were the Empathy Quotient Scale, document analysis and open-ended questionnaire. The study was conducted with 64 prospective classroom teachers attending at Istanbul University, Turkey. The dependent t-test was employed to analyze the quantitative data and content analysis for qualitative data.
Results: As a result, it was seen that the qualitative data supported the quantitative data. According to the quantitative data, after receiving empathy-based education programme, the students developed the skills of empathy. According to the qualitative data, it was determined that prospective teachers understood the importance of empathy and put themselves in the place of others. In addition, the prospective teachers considered that empathy would have several positive contributions to their future primary school students. It is thought that the results obtained from this study will guide teaching practices involving empathy-based activities.
Discussion: According to the findings obtained from the quantitative data, the empathy-based education programme provided for the prospective teachers caused a significant increase in their empathy levels. Similarly, in a study who applied a critical thinking programme and empathic tendency scale to prospective teachers, reported a positive correlation between critical thinking and empathic tendency at a low-level significance. According to the findings obtained from the qualitative data, the topics chosen for the preparation of empathy-based activities were mostly from the life skills subjects of the first grade of primary school, followed by second and third grades. This may be because the prospective teachers considered it appropriate to perform empathy-based activities with children from the earliest age. Furthermore, a higher number of participants chose to prepare written empathy-based activities, followed by drawing and photography, which might be attributed to their belief that they could better express themselves through writing, rather than drawing or taking/showing pictures.
Limitations: The study group covered in the third year of the classroom teaching programme in the selected university only. Although the empathy-based education programme prepared by the researcher was implemented with the prospective teachers as part of the life skills teaching course in 10 class hours.
Conclusions: In conclusion, empathy is considered to be very important especially in the education of children of young age. As revealed by the review of literature, empathy skills also affect many positive elements. For this reason and considering that the available research in the literature is based either on quantitative or on qualitative data, more mixed-design studies are needed to investigate the effects of similar empathy-based education programmes integrated into life skills and social studies courses. In addition, it is as important to conduct empathy-based activities in other courses of the primary and middle school as in life skills and social studies courses. It is also suggested that empathy-based education should also be provided for teacher candidates enrolled in science teaching programmes, as well as those in social studies.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
Barnett M. A. & Thompson S. (2001). The role of perspective taking and empathy in children’s machiavellianism prosocial behaviour and motive for helping. The Journal of Genetic Psychology 146(3) 295-305.
Creswell J. W. (2016). Research design qualitative quantitative and mixed methods approaches. In S. B. Demir (Trans. Eds.) Ankara: Educating Book.
Ekinci Ö. & Aybek B. (2010). Analysis of the empathy and the critical thinking disposition of the teacher candidates. Elementary Education Online 9(2) 816-827.
Elikesik M. & Alım M. (2013). The investigation of empathic skills of social sciences teachers in terms of some variables. Ataturk University Journal of the Institute of Social Sciences 17(3) 167-180.
Feshbach N. D. & Feshbach S. (2009). Empathy and education. In J. Decety & W. Ickes (Eds.) The social neuroscience of empathy (pp. 85-98). Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Kaya B. & Çolakoğlu Ö. M. (2015). Adaptation of empathy quotient (EQ) scale. Inonu University Journal of Education Faculty 16(1) 17-30. https://doi.org/10.17679/iuefd.16127895
Kabapınar Y. (2004). Empathy through drawings as a teaching activity used in primary school social studies courses. Marmara University Ataturk Education Faculty Journal of Educational Sciences 20 85-100.
Kabapınar Y. (2005). Empathy as a teaching method that can be used in teaching life science and social studies with application and evaluation criteria. Journal of Values Education 3(9) 119-142.
Krznaric R. (2008). You are therefore I am: How empathy education can create social change. Oxfam GB Research Report.
Lawrence E. J. Shaw P. Baker D. Baron-Cohen S. & David A. S. (2004). Measuring empathy: Reliability and validity of the empathy quotient. Psychological Medicine 34 911-924.
Mareš J. (2017). Prosocial behavior education in children. Acta Educationis Generalis 7(2) 7-16. https://doi.org/10.1515/atd-2017-0009
McAllister G. & Irvine J. J. (2002). The role of empathy in teaching culturally diverse students a qualitative study of teachers’ beliefs. Journal of Teacher Education 53(5) 433-443.
Miles M. B. & Huberman A. M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook qualitative data analysis. London: Sage Publications.
Ministry of National Education. (2018). Life studies course curriculum: 1st 2nd and 3rd grades. Ankara: Ministry of National Education Publishing.
Patton M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. M. Bütün & S. B. Demir (Trans. Eds.) Ankara: Pegem Publishing.
Peck N. F. Maude S. P. & Brotherson M. J. (2015). Understanding preschool teachers’ perspectives on empathy: A qualitative inquiry. Early Childhood Education Journal 43(3) 169-179.
Sinclair B. B. & Fraser B. J. (2002). Changing classroom environments in urban middle schools. Learning Environments Research 5 301-328.
Şahin M. (2012). An investigation into the efficiency of empathy training program on preventing bullying in primary schools. Children and Youth Services Review 34 1325-1330.
Tamášová V. & Barnová S. (2019). Coping with adversity in the lives of children in foster care. Acta Educationis Generalis 9(1) 1-19. https://doi.org/10.2478/atd-2019-0001
Tettegah S. (2007). Pre-service teachers’ victim empathy: Cognitions problem solving and technology. Technology Instruction Cognition and Learning 5 41-68.