Introduction: The article presents the results of a research project the aim of which was to describe the level of kindergarten teachers’ work with educational objectives in connection with the application of a differentiated curriculum for the development of gifted children.
Methods: The research tool was a questionnaire in which the teachers selected one of three answers possible and matched their pedagogical activities in kindergarten the most. 345 teachers from kindergartens in the Czech Republic took part in the research. Data was processed using computer software SPSS.
Results: It was discovered that most of them can differentiate their instructions, however, at least a half of them do not respect the rules of inclusive education and their instructions result in an unwanted labelling of the gifted children. We have also proved that the level of the teachers’ work with the educational objectives is positively influenced by their longer than 10 years’ experience, work with heterogeneous class age-wise, and their having attended a seminar focused on the topic of giftedness.
Discussion: The discussion focuses on the description of variables affecting the level of work with educational objectives in connection with the application of a differentiated curriculum for the development of gifted children.
Limitations: The limitation is the simplification of the pedagogical reality into 3 possible answers and the artificial metrization of this data. Another problem was that our questionnaire was focused only on selected aspects of pedagogical work with gifted preschoolers, which were related to the curriculum modification and inclusive education. Furthermore, despite the big amount of validly filled in questionnaires (345) the research cannot be considered to be large area survey and the results cannot be generalized.
Conclusions: Gifted children should have the maximal space for the development of their own potential. It is also necessary to increase the teachers’ skills to apply the differentiated curriculum with the features of inclusive education in order to develop the giftedness of all the children as much as possible. One of the possibilities is the kindergarten teachers’ attendance to educational events on the topic of giftedness, which is one of the variables which significantly influence the quality of their work.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
Akalin S. & Demir S. et al. (2014). The needs of inclusive preschool teachers about inclusive practices. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research54 39-60.
Bailey D. B. & Leonard J. (1977). A model for adapting. Bloom’s taxonomy to a preschool curriculum for the gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly21(1) 97-103.
Cukierkorn J. R. Karnes F. A. & Manning S. (2007). Serving the preschool gifted child: Programming and resources. Roeper Review29(4) 271-276.
Ericsson K. A. (2006). The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. In K. A. Ericsson et al. (Eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (pp. 683-704). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hertzog N. B. (2008). Early Childhood Gifted Education. Texas: Prufrock Press Inc.
Heward W. L. (2013). Exceptional Children. An Introduction to Special Education. Ohio: Pearson.
Kostelnik M. J. Soderman A. K. & Whiren A. P. (2004). Developmentally Appropriate Curriculum: Best Practices in Early Childhood Education. NJ: Pearson.
Machů E. & Kočvarová I. (2013). Kvalita školy z hlediska péče o nadané žáky. Zlín: UTB ve Zlíně.
Mönks F. J. (1992). Development of gifted children: The issue of identification and programming. In F. J. Mönks. & W. A. M. Peters (Eds.) Talent for the Future. Proceedings of the Ninth World Conference on Gifted and Talented Children (pp. 191-202). Assen: Van Gorcum.
Nind M. Rix J. Sheehy K. & Simmons K. (2013). Curriculum and Pedagogy in Inclusive Education. London and New York: Routledge.
Olszewski - Kubilius P. (2003). Early Gifts - Recognizing and Nurturing Children’s Talents. Texas: Prufrock Press.
Palmer D. J. Stough L. M. Burdnski T. K. & Gonzales M. (2005). Identifying teacher expertise: An examination of researchers’ decision making. Educational Psychologist 40(1) 13-25.
Riley T. L. (2011). Teaching Gifted Students in the Inclusive Classroom. USA: Prufrock.
Sankar - DeLeeuw N. (2013). Gifted preschoolers: Parent and teacher views on identification early admission and programming. Roeper Review 21(3) 174-179.
Smith C. M. M. (2006). Principles of inclusion: Implications for able learners. In C. M. M. Smith (Ed.) Including the Gifted and Talented. Making Inclusion Work for More Gifted and Able Learners (pp. 3-21). London: Routledge.
Škrabánková J. & Martínková M. (2018). Giftedness as a possible risk of bullying. Acta Educationalis Generalis 8(3) 69-93. https://doi.org/10.2478/atd-2018-0018
Taber K. S. Sumida M. & Mcclue L. (2018). Teaching Gifted Learners in STEM Subjects. NY: Routledge.
Tomlinson C. A. (2013). Differentiated instruction. In C. M. Callahan & H. L. Herberg-Davis (Eds.) Fundamentals of Gifted Education Considering Multiple Perspectives (pp. 287-300). NY: Routledge.
Trávníčková P. (2018). An analysis of teacher’s didactical activity in the context of children’s preconception usage. Acta Educationalis Generalis 8(2) 40-53.https://doi.org/10.2478/atd-2018-0010
Van Tassel-Baska J. & Stambaugh T. (2005). Challenges and possibilities for serving gifted learners in the regular classroom. Theory into Practice 44 211-217.
Westberg K. & Daoust M. E. (2004). The Results of the Classroom Practices Survey Replication in Two States. Connecticut: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.