Developing Students’ Language Competence and Essential 21st Century Skills for Future Employability: The Case of Latvia and Lithuania

Open access


Introduction: Nowadays, language and intercultural competences have become core employability skills in many fields, supporting the development of other skills which emphasizes the necessity for specific pedagogic approaches in developing online learning materials and courses that would develop learners’ language competence and other relevant 21st century skills for future employability. The current comparative summative evaluation research conducted in two higher education institutions in Latvia and Lithuania analyses students’ feedback, elicited from 200 students, on the efficiency of the methods and methodologies applied in the course development and their suitability to develop the above-mentioned skills and competences.

Methods: The research implies a mixed-model design comprising a students’ questionnaire (a quantitative tool) and students’ essays (a qualitative tool). Quantitative data analysis was done applying descriptive and inferential statistics tests by IBM SPSS 22 software, qualitative data analysis – applying discourse analysis.

Results: The findings indicate that students highly evaluate the learning platform and the courses created. They find them as useful, visually appealing, interesting, interactive, well-structured, and easy to understand. Students acknowledge that they have developed their knowledge of professional lexis, reading skills, grammar and gained useful knowledge in their field. Significant differences were found concerning students’ group, specialization and the course completed – local students vs. international students as to the evaluation of the learning platform, students of IT field vs. business fields, Latvian students vs. Lithuanian students as to the intercultural B2/C1 English course completed. The research results strengthen the cognitions derived from theory on significant issues to be observed when creating blended-learning courses.

Discussion: The course designed is an alternative way of learning and may be useful for anyone who wishes to update their language and intercultural competence either through a formal or non-formal education course or on a lifelong learning basis.

Limitations: The research period covered one semester only. Although the study materials for 16 languages have been created, the current paper analyses only the results obtained in piloting English and Spanish courses, with the predominance of learners opting for English courses.

Conclusions: The research results show that the methods and methodologies applied in the given interactive blended-learning courses have developed the students’ language competence and have fostered the development of their digital competence, team-working and collaboration skills, problem-solving skills and learning-to-learn thus motivating them to become autonomous learners. The pedagogy-based approach applied in the current research has been successful despite a few flaws in the design of the course materials.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • A European Roadmap for Linguistic Diversity: Towards a New Approach on Languages as Part of the European Agenda 2020. (2015). Retrieved from

  • Ananiadou K. & Claro M. (2009). 21st century skills and competences for new millennium learners in OECD countries. OECD Education Working Papers 41. Paris: OECD Publishing.

  • Binkley M. Erstad O. Herman J. Raizen S. Ripley M. Miller-Ricci M. & Rumble M. (2012). Defining twenty-first century skills. In P. Griffin B. McGaw & E. Care (Eds.) Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills (pp. 17-66). Dordrecht: Springer.

  • Bueno-Alastuey M. C. & López Pérez M. V. (2014). Evaluation of a blended learning language course: Students’ perceptions of appropriateness for the development of skills and language areas. Computer Assisted Language Learning 27(6) 509-527.

  • Care E. & Anderson K. (2016). How Education Systems Approach Breadth of Skills. Skills for a Changing World. Brookings: Centre for Universal Education.

  • Cedefop. (2016). Future Skill Needs in Europe: Critical Labour Force Trends. Cedefop research paper; No.59. Luxembourg: Publications Office.

  • Cedefop. (2018). Insights into Skill Shortages and Skill Mismatch: Learning from Cedefop’s European Skills and Jobs Survey. Cedefop reference series 106. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from

  • Chu S. K. W. Reynolds R. B. Tavares N. J. Notari M. & Lee C. W. Y. (2017). 21st Century Skills Development Through Inquiry-Based Learning. From Theory to Practice. Singapore: Springer.

  • Donina A. & Luka I. (2014). The compliance of tourism education with industry needs in Latvia. EJTHR Tourism Research 5(3) 91-120.

  • enGauge 21st century skills. (2003). Literacy in the Digital Age. Retrieved from

  • European Commission. (2015). New Priorities for European Cooperation in Education and Training. Retrieved from

  • Eurostat. (2018). Foreign Language Skills statistics. Retrieved from

  • Fawcett B. & Pockett R. (2015). Turning Ideas into Research. Theory Design & Practice. LA: SAGE.

  • Fischer J. Casey E. Abrantes A. M. Gigl E. & Lešnik M. (2008). LCaS – Language Case Studies. Teacher Training Modules on the Use of Case Studies in Language Teaching at Secondary and University Level. A handbook. Graz: European Centre for Modern Languages/Council of Europe.

  • Grigsby Y. Theard-Griggs C. & Lilly C. (2015). (Re)Claiming voices: Digital storytelling and second language learners. Acta Technologica Dubnicae 5(1) 60-67.

  • Heinze A. & Procter C. (2004). Reflections on the use of blended learning. In Education in a Changing Environment. UK: University of Salford.

  • Kaya H. (2015). Blending technology with constructivism: Implications for an ELT classroom. Teaching English with Technology 15(1) 3-13.

  • Krashen S. (1989). We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: Additional evidence for the input hypothesis. Modern Language Journal 31(1) 440-464. Retrieved from

  • Laborda J. G. (2009). Using webquests for oral communication in English as a foreign language for tourism studies. Journal of Educational Technology & Society 12(1) 258-270.

  • Laborda J. G. & Litzler M. F. (2015). Current perspectives in teaching English for Specific Purposes. ONOMÁZEIN 31 38-51.

  • (2016). The project webpage. Retrieved from

  • Lu F.-C. & Chang B. (2016). Role-play game-enhanced English for a Specific-Purpose vocabulary-acquisition framework. Journal of Educational Technology & Society 19(2) 367-377.

  • Luka I. (2016). Developing language competence for tourism students and employees in a blended learning language course. Society. Integration. Education I 137-157.

  • Luka I. (2018). Summative evaluation of online language learning course efficiency for students studying tourism and hospitality management. Quality Assurance in Education (26)4 446-465.

  • Marcinkonienė R. & Zdanytė J. (2015). Screen vs paper in foreign language learning. Research Journal Studies about Languages. Kalbu Studijos 27 106-114.

  • Marope P. T. M. (2014). Learning and competences for the 21st century. Prospects 44(4) 483-486.

  • Millar M. & Park S.-Y. (2013). Sustainability in hospitality education: The industry’s perspective and implications for curriculum. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education 25(2) 80-88.

  • Mulder M. (2016). Competence for the unknown future. ASEM Conference Copenhagen Denmark October 5 2016. Retrieved from

  • O’Leary Z. (2010). The Essential Guide to Doing Your Research Project. LA: SAGE.

  • OECD. (2018). The Future of Education and Skills 2030. Retrieved from

  • Olejarczuk E. (2014). The e-learning component of a blended learning course. Teaching English with Technology 14(3) 58-68.

  • Queensland Curriculum & Assessment Authority. (2015). 21st Century Skills for Senior Education. An Analysis of Educational Trends. Retrieved from

  • Ryabchikova K. (2018). Development of intercultural competence during pedagogical practice of Ukrainian students in vocational schools in slovakia. Acta Educationis Generalis 8(3) 109-117.

  • Saunders M. Lewis P. & Thornhill A. (2009). Research Methods for Business Students (5th edition). Harlow: Pearson Education Ltd.

  • Saunders V. & Zuzel K. (2010). Evaluating employability skills: Employer and student perceptions. Bioscience Education 15(1) 1-15.

  • Schmitt N. (2000). Vocabulary in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Scott C. L. (2015). The Futures of Learning 2: What Kind of Learning for the 21st Century? Paris: UNESCO Education Research and Foresight.

  • Silva S. (2009). Measuring skills for 21st-century learning. Phi Delta Kappa 90(09) 630-634.

  • Simándi S. (2017). Study circles in online learning environment in the spirit of learning-centered approach. Acta Educationis Generalis7(2) 96-104.

  • Sós T. (2018). The interrelations of competency expectations in connection with career-starter skilled workers in the counties of Northern Hungary. Acta Educationis Generalis 8(2) 54-62.

  • Stone G. & Ineson E. (2015). Introduction. In E. Ineson M. Smith & V. Nita (Eds.) International Case Studies for Hospitality Tourism and Event Management Students and Trainees (pp. xv-xvi). 6. Iasi: Tehnopress.

  • Suto I. (2013). 21st century skills: Ancient ubiquitous enigmatic? Research Matters: A Cambridge Assessment publication 15 2-18. Retrieved from

  • Szobiová E. (2015). Creativity in organizational environment. Acta Technologica Dubnicae5(2) 69-79.

  • The glossary of education reform. (2016). 21st Century Skills. Retrieved from

  • Tomlinson B. (2003). Materials evaluation. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.) Developing Materials for Language Teaching (pp. 16-36). London: Continuum.

  • Tuomaitė V. & Zajankauskaitė Z. (2017). Oral communication in a foreign language competence development in academic contexts. Research Journal Studies about Languages. Kalbu Studijos 31 113-129.

  • Walliman N. (2016). Social Research Methods. LA: SAGE.

  • Wang Y-F. & Tsai C.-T. (2014). Employability of hospitality graduates: Student and industry perspectives. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education 26(3) 125-135.

  • World Economic Forum. (2015). New Vision for Education. Geneva. Retrieved from

  • Yang F.-C. O. & Wu W.-C. V. (2015). Using mixed-modality learning strategies via e-learning for second language vocabulary acquisition. Educational Technology & Society 18(3) 309-322.

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 258 258 23
PDF Downloads 123 123 8