The Guerrilla Literacy Learners Project: Development of Literacies through Informal Learning


Introduction: This paper deals with the options of non-formal education and, partially, a set of literacies developed within informal learning, which an individual should be equipped with in order to succeed in life in the contemporary society. At the beginning, there is a mention to the nature of learning and knowledge of society in the context of lifelong learning.

Purpose: The aim of the paper is to analyse and explain non-formal education in contemporary society of knowledge and, subsequently, to provide examples of its use when developing operational literacy. This literacy can be defined as an individual’s ability to be nimble, proactive, and responsive to various life situations.

Methods: The paper serves as an overview study of the subject. For a literary analysis, the methods of comparison and content analysis were used with examples of good practice at the end.

Conclusions: At the end of the paper, one can find an example of the international project “Guerrilla Literacy Learners” the goal of which is to find innovative strategies for informal learning and to develop a methodology that would support the development of literacy and active knowledge of a foreign language by using modern teaching resources, such as ICT, visually attractive materials and adequate methods - MOOC and blended learning.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Alam, K. R. (2004). Operational definition of literacy for assessment purposes: Literacy to meet basic learning meeds. Adult Education and Development, 61, 41-50. Retrieved from:

  • Delors, J. (1996). Learning: The treasure within. Report to UNESCO of the International Commission on education for the twenty-first century. Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved from:

  • Drucker, P. (1959). Landmarks of tomorrow: A report on the new "post-modern" world. Transaction Publisher.

  • EUR-Lex (2000). Commission memorandum of 30 October, 2000 on lifelong learning. Retrieved from:

  • EUR-Lex (2013). Opening up education: Innovative teaching and learning for all through new technologies and open educational resources. Retrieved from:

  • European Commission. (1995). White Paper on teaching and learning: Towards the learning society. Retrieved from:

  • Jůvová, A., & F. Bakker. (2015). Didactic principles by Comenius and 21st century skills. e-PEDAGOGIUM, 2, 7-20.

  • Jůvová, A. et al. (2015). Reflection of constructivist theories in current educational practice. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 3(5), 345-349. Retrievd from: DOI: 10.13189/ ujer.2015.030506

  • Kolomazník, J. (2000). K některým sociálním aspektům a posunům v koncepcích postindustriální a informační společnosti. Sociologický časopis, 36(2|, 221-232. Retrieved from:

  • Köln Charter: Aims and ambitions for lifelong learning (1999). Retrieved from:

  • Liessmann, K. P. (2006). Theorie der Unbildung: Die Irrtümer der Wissensgesellschaft. Wien: Zsolnay.

  • Modern teacher. A revolutionary platform for teaching and learning in the digital world. Retrieved from:

  • OECD. (2016). Skills matter: Further results from the survey of adult skills, Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from: DOI:

  • Orr, D., Rimini, M., & Van Damme, D. (2015). Open educational resources: A catalyst for innovation, educational research and innovation. Paris: OECD Publishing, Retrieved from:

  • Oosterlinck, A. (2014). "Leraren hebben een te Laag niveau". Knack. Retrieved from:

  • Rabušicová, M., & Rabušic, L. O informálním učení v České republice. Retrieved from:

  • Reich, R. (1992). The Work of Nations. New York: Random House.

  • Simonová, N. (2010). „Výzkumy funkční gramotnosti dospělých - SIALS a PIAAC.“ Socioweb, 4. Retrieved from:

  • Straka, G. A. (2009). Informal and implicit learning: concepts, communalities and ifferences [Informální a implicitní učení: pojetí, komunality a rozdíly]. EJVT, 48, 132-145. Retrieved from:

  • Šima, K. (2006). Paradigma společnosti vědění a jeho uplatnění v evropské vysokoškolské politice. AULA, 14, 4. Retrieved from:

  • Tawil, S., & Cougoureux, M. (2013). Revisiting learning: The treasure within. Assessing the influence of the 1996 Delors Report. UNESCO Education Research and Foresight; Occasional paper, 4. Retrieved from:

  • Toffler, A., & Toffler, H. (1996). Utváranie novej civilizácie. Politika tretej vlny. Bratislava: Open Windows.

  • Thyssen, M. (2016). Keynote speech at the launch event of the “New Skills Agenda for Europe”, Brussels. Retrieved from:

  • UNESCO. (2014). Teaching and learning: Achieving quality for all. education for all global monitoring report. Retrieved from:

  • Veselý, A. (2005). Co je a není společnost vědění? AULA,13, 3. Retrieved from:


Journal + Issues