This paper is based on the analysis of a focus group interview of a moderator and a group of undergraduate students on the topic of self-regulation of learning. The purpose of the investigation was to identify interaction patterns that appeared in the talk of participants and the moderator. In the stream of communication two rudimentary interaction patterns were recognized. The first pattern was named the Catalogue. It consists of a sequence of turns of participants who respond to a request of the moderator and who provide their answers, one by one, without reacting on the content of the previous partner(s) talk. The other interaction pattern was called the Domino. In this pattern participants respond to each other. The Catalogue pattern prevailed in the interview. Alongside with identification of patterns of interaction the study demonstrated the functions of the common ground and its accomplishment in the talk of the moderator and participants.
Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. A. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L.B. Resnick, J.M. Levine, & Teasley, S.D. (Eds.) Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington: APA Books, pp. 127-149.
Clark, H.H. (2006). Context and common ground. In Brown, K. (ed.) Encyclopedia of language and linguistics. Vol. 3. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 105-108.
Clark, H.H., & Schaefer, E.F. (1987). Collaborating on contributions to conversations. Language and Cognitive Processes, 2(1), 19-41.
Flick, U. (2002). An introduction to qualitative research. London: SAGE.
Gavora, P., Jakešová, J., & Kalenda, J. (2015). The Czech validation of the Self-regulation Questionnaire. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 171, 222–230.
Gronkjaer, M., Curtis, T., De Crespigny, CH., & Delmar, Ch. (2011). Analysing group interaction in focus group research: Impact on content and the role of the moderator. Qualitative Studies, 2(1), 16-31.
Halkier, B. (2010). Focus groups as social enactments: integrating interaction and content in the analysis of focus group data. Qualitative Research, 10(1), 71-89.
Heritage, J. (1989). Current developments in conversation analysis. In Roger, D., Peter Bull (Eds.), Conversation: an interdisciplinary perspective. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 21-47
Hydén, L. C., & Bülow, P. H. (2003). Who's talking: drawing conclusions from focus groups: some methodological considerations. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 6, 305-321.
Jakešová, J., Kalenda, J., & Gavora, P. (2015) Self-regulation and academic self-efficacy of Czech university students. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 1117–1123.
Kalenda, J., & Vávrová, S. (in press). Self-regulated learning in students of helping professions. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences.
Kalenda, J., & Vávrová, S. (2005). Mapping the self-regulated learning of adults. In Efficiency and Responsibility in Education. Prague: Czech University of Life Sciences, pp. 239-249.
Kitzinger, J. (2005). Focus group research: Using group dynamics to explore perceptions, experiences and understandings. In Holloway I. (Ed.) Qualitative research in health care. Maidenhead: Open University Press, pp.56-69.
Merton, R.K., Fiske, M., & Kendall, P.L. (1990). The focused interview. New York: Free Press.
Morgan, D. L. (2001). Ohniskové skupiny jako metoda kvalitativního výzkumu. Boskovice: Albert.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696-733.
Stewart, D.W., Shamdasani, P.E., & Rook, D.W. (2007). Focus group: theory and practice. London: SAGE.
Vaughn, S., Schumm, J.S., & Sinagub, J. (1996). Focus group interview in education and psychology. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Vávrová, S., & Gavora, P. (2014). Analýza ohniskové skupiny ve výchovném ústavu. Studia paedagogica, 19(2),105-121.