Comparative Analysis of Pine Needles and Coal for Electricity Generation using Carbon Taxation and Emission Reductions

Open access

Abstract

Mitigating global climate change via emission control and taxation is promising for strengthening the economic benefits of bioenergy generation and utilization. This study examines the cost effectiveness of pine needles as an alternative fuel for off-grid electricity generation in India. We first examined the changes of prices in coal for electricity generation due to CO2 emission reductions and taxes using experimental data of gasification plants. The time value of money and depreciation scale were used to find out the real levellized cost of electricity generation of gasification plants. Then, the costs of electricity generation fuelled by pine needles and coal were estimated using the cost analysis method. Our results indicate that pine needles would have more competitive edge than coal if emission had taxed at about an emission tax INR 525.15 Mg-1 of CO2 (US$ 8.4), or higher would be needed for pine needles at a yield of 202.176 dry Mg hm-2 yr. The price of coal used for electricity generation would have significantly increased if global CO2 emission had abridged by 20% or more. However, pine needles were found a much better fuel source with an increasing yield of 5.05 Mg hm-2 yr (with respect to power generation) and 2.335 Mg hm-2 yr (with respect to feedstock production).

APP. 2010. The Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate. Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate website. Retrieved from http:// www.asiapacificpartnership.org/pdf/translated_versions/Fact_Sheet_English.pdf

Bridgewater , A. V 1995. The technical and economic feasibility of biomass gasification for power generation. In Fuel, vol. 74, 1995, no. 5, pp. 631-653.

Brown , R. J. - Yanuck, R. R. 1980. Life Cycle Costing: A Practical Guide for Energy Managers. Atlanta : Fairmont Press, Inc.

Carlo , N. - Hamelinck , C. N. - Suurs, R. A. A. - Faaij, A. P. C. 2005. International bioenergy transport costs and energy balance. In Biomass and Bioenergy, 2005, no. 29, pp. 114-134.

Central Electricity Authority (CEA). 2000. Performance review of thermal power stations. Retrieved from http://cea.nic.in//reports/yearly/thermal_perfm_review_rep/9900

Commerce Clearing House, Inc. (CCH). 1992. U.S. Master Tax Guide. 75th anniversary edition.

Dhaundiyal , A. - Gupta , V. K. 2014. Analysis of pine needles as a substrate for gasification. In Journal of Water, Energy and Environment, 2014, no. 15, pp. 73-81.

Dogra , S. 2010. India sets $1/mt clean coal tax for domestic producers/importers. Platts International Coal Report.

Gresham , C. A. 1982. Litterfall patterns in mature loblolly and longleaf pine stands in coastal South Carolina. In Forest Science, vol. 28, 1982, no. 2, pp. 223-231.

Guttikunda , K. - Jawahar , P. 2014. Atmospheric emissions and pollution from the coal-fired thermal power plants in India. In Atmospheric Environment, 2014, no. 92, pp. 449-460.

Hall, D. O. - Rosillo -Calle, F. - Williams , R. H. - Woods, J.1993. Biomass for energy: Supply prospects. In Johansson, T. B. - Kelly, H. - Amulya, K. N. R. - Williams, R. H. (editors). Renewable Energy, Sources for Fuels and Electricity. Washington, D.C. : Island Press, 1993, pp. 593-653.

Horlock , J. H. 1995. Combined power plants - past, present and future. In Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, vol. 117, 1995, no. 4, pp. 608-616.

Islegen, Ö. - Reichelstein, S. 2011. Carbon capture by fossil fuel power plants: an economic analysis. In Management Science, 2011, no. 57, pp. 21-39.

Jones, B. et al. 2008. Recent emission-reduction policy initiatives. In Chapter 4. Climate change and the global economy (Tamirisa et al.). In World Economic and Financial Surveys: World Economic Outlook: Housing and the Business Cycle. A survey by staff of the IMF. Washington, D.C., International Monetary Fund. Retrieved from http://www.imf.org/

Lawrence , D. M. - Slater , A. G. 2005. A projection of severe near-surface permafrost degradation during the 21st century. In Geophysical Research Letters, 2005, no. 32(L24401), p. 1-5.

Nienow, S. - McNamara , K. - Gillespie, A. - Preckel, P. 1999. A model for the economic evaluation of plantation biomass production for co-firing with coal in electricity production. In Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, vol. 28, 1999, no. 1, pp. 106-118.

Palm, T. - Qayum , A. 1985. Private and Public Investment Analysis. Cincinnati, South-Western Publishing Co.

Pearson, N. O. 2010. India to raise $ 535 million from carbon tax on coal. Bloomsberg Businessweek, 1 July.

Perlack , R. - Wright, L. - Huston , M. - Schramm , W. 1995. Biomass fuel from woody crops for electricity power generation. ORNL-6871. US Department of Energy Oak Ridge National Laboratory, TN.

Sengupta , D. - Bureau , ET. 2014. Coal India Limited: Coal India can expect higher realizations from e-auctions with blocks likely to be returned. Retrieved from http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/

Stern, N. 2007. Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change (pre-publication edition). Cambridge, New York, Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/

Uttarakhand Renewable Energy Development Agency (UREDA). 2014. Report on availability of biomass in Uttarakhand.

Uttar Pradesh Gazetteer - Pithoragarh District. 1967. Chapter V Industries. Retrieved from http://pithoragarh.nic.in/files/Gazetteer/industries.pdf

Acta Technologica Agriculturae

The Scientific Journal for Agricultural Engineering The Journal of Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra

Journal Information

CiteScore 2018: 0.98

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.315
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.986

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 391 284 22
PDF Downloads 145 121 11