Diversity and distribution of testate amoebae (Amoebozoa, Rhizaria) in reservoirs, Northeastern Bulgaria

Open access


The aim of the study is to describe the testate amoebae fauna in seven reservoirs in the Northeastern Bulgaria and to investigate the relationship of taxonomic diversity and abundance of these organisms to the some characteristics of the reservoirs. A total of 52 species, varieties and forms belonging to 15 genera were identified in the benthal of the coastal zone. There are significant differences in species richness and abundance between the testacea of different reservoirs. Number of taxa was significantly higher in the Beli Lom (29 species and 12 genera) and Loznitsa (22 species and 13 genera). Most of the reservoirs - Kara Michal, Bogdantsi, Isperih, Lipnik and Brestovene have extremely poor fauna compared to other similar reservoirs. This is confirmed by the low values of the Shannon-Weaver diversity index, which varied between 1.04 and 2.396, as well as by the other indices used to assess the environmental conditions in the reservoirs. The data of the regression analysis showed that a relation between age, surface area and water volume of the reservoirs and the species richness and abundance of testacea is not established.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1]. Moraczewski J. Taxocenoses des Testacea de quelques petits bassins de terrains inondables de la Narew Acta Protozoologica 1965vol.III 18 189-213.

  • [2]. Junk W. J.; Bayley P. B.; Sparks R. R. The flood pulse concept in river floodplain systems. In: Proceedings of the International Large River Symposium; Dodge D. P. Ed.; Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences1989; 110-127.

  • [3]. Mendez V.; Gill J.; Burton N.; Austin G.; Petchey O.; Davies R. Functional diversity across space and time: trends in wader communities on British estuaries. Diversity and Distribution 201218 356-365.

  • [4]. Schwind L.; Arrieira R.; Mantovano T.; Bonecker C.; Lansac-Tôha F. Temporal influence on the functional traits of testate amoebae in a floodplain lake Limnetica 201635 (2) 355-364.

  • [5]. Disaster Protection Plan of Razgrad District 2014 p. 18. https://www.razgrad.bg/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=4841&Itemid=345&lang=bg

  • [6]. Deflandre G. Le genre Arcella Ehrenberg Arch. Protistenk. 192864 152-287.

  • [7]. Deflandre G. Le genre Centropyxis Stein Arch. Protistenk. 192967 323-374.

  • [8]. Gauthier-Lievre L.; Thomas R. Les genres Difflugia Pentagonia Maghrebia et Hoogenraadia (Rhizopodes testaces) en Afrique Arch. Protistenk. 1958103 241-370.

  • [9]. Thomas R. Le genre Plagiopyxis Penard Hydrobiologia 195810 198-214.

  • [10]. Decloitre L. Le genre Euglypha Dujardin Arch. Protistenk. 1962106 51-100.

  • [11]. Schönborn W. Studien uber die Gattung Difflugiella Cash (Rhizopoda Testacea) Limnologica (Berlin) 19653 3 315-328.

  • [12]. Ogden C.; Hedley R. An Atlas of Freshwater Testate Amoebae Bull. Br. Mus. (Natural History) Oxford University press 1980 p. 222.

  • [13]. Ogden C. Observations on the systematics of the genus Difflugia in Britain (Rhizopoda Protozoa) Bull Br Mus (Natural History) Zoology series 198344 p. 73.

  • [14]. Ogden C.; Živcovic A. Morphological studies on some Difflugiidae from Yugoslavia (Rhizopoda Protozoa) Bull. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist. (Zool.) 1983 44 (6) 341-370.

  • [15]. Hammer O.; Harper D.; Ryan P. PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis Palaeontologia Electronica 20014 (1) p. 9.

  • [16]. StatSoft inc. Statistica (Data analysis software system) Vers. 10. Computer software. 2010. [http://www.statsoft.com].

  • [17]. Moraczewski J. Différenciation écologique de la faune des Testacés du littoral peu profond du lac Mamry Polsk. Arch. Hydrob. 196210 333-353.

  • [18]. Schönborn W. Die Ökologie der Testaceen im oligotrophen See dargestellt am Beispiel des Groben Stechlinsees Limnologica (Berlin) 19621 111-182.

  • [19]. Golemansky V. Materiaux sur la systematique et l`ecologie des thecamoebiens (Protozoa Rhizopoda) du lac D`Ohrid Prir.-mat. F. Univ. ZITETOT Skopie XIV 19674 (76) 3-21.

  • [20]. Vikol M. Testaceous Amoebae (Rhizopoda Testacea) of the basins of Dnestr. AN Republic of Moldova Inst. of Zoology. 1992 p. 128.

  • [21]. Booth R. K. Ecology of testate amoebae (protozoa) in two lake superior coastal wetlands: implications for palaeoecology and environmental monitoring Wetlands 200121 564-576.

  • [22]. Davidova R.; Golemansky V.; Todorov M. Diversity and Biotopic Distribution of Testate Amoebae (Arcellinida and Euglyphida) of Ticha Dam (Northeastern Bulgaria) Acta zoologica bulgarica 2008 Suppl. 2 7-18.

  • [23]. Todorov M.; Golemansky V.; Temelkov B. Diversity and Biotopic Distribution of Testate amoebae (Protozoa: Arcellinida and Euglyphida) in the Batak Reservoir (Soutern Bulgaria) Acta zoologica bulgarica 200860 (2) 115-124.

  • [24]. Qin Y.; Booth R.; Gu Y.; Wang Y.; Xie S. Testate amoebae as indicators of 20th century environmental change of Lake Zhangdu China Fund Appl Limnol 2009175 29-38.

  • [25]. Davidova R. Testate Amoebae Communities (Protozoa: Arcellinida and Euglyphida) in the Rabisha Reservoir (Northwestern Bulgaria) Acta zoologica bulgarica 201062 (3) 259-269.

  • [26]. Roe H.; Patterson R.; Swindles G. Controls on the contemporary distribution of lake thecamoebians (testate amoebae) within the Greater Toronto Area and their potential as water quality Indicators J Paleolimnol 201043 955-975.

  • [27]. Davidova R. Biotopic Distribution of Testate Amoebae (Protozoa: Arcellinida and Euglyphida) in Ovcharitsa Reservoir (Southeastern Bulgaria) Acta zoologica bulgarica 201264 (1) 13-22.

  • [28]. Roe H.; Patterson R. Arcellacea (Testate Amoebae) as bioindicators of road salt contamination in lakes Microbial Ecol 201468 299-313.

  • [29]. Davidova R.; Boycheva M. Testate Amoebae Fauna (Amoebozoa Rhizaria) from the Benthal of Kamchia Reservoir (Eastern Bulgaria) Acta zoologica bulgarica 201567 (3) 375-384.

  • [30]. Hobaek A.; Manca M; Andersen T. Factors influencing species richness in lacustrine zooplankton Acta Oecologica 200223 155-163.

  • [31]. Hessen D.; Faafeng B.; Smith V.; Bakkestuen V.; Walseng B. Extrinsic and Intrinsic Controls of Zooplankton Diversity in Lakes Ecology 200687 (2) 433-443.

  • [32]. Frisch D.; Moreno-Ostos E.; Green A. Species richness and distribution of copepods and cladocerans and their relation to hydroperiod and other environmental variables in Doñana south-west Spain Hydrobiologia 2006556 327-340.

  • [33]. Dodson S.; Everhart W.; Jandl A.; Krauskopf S. Effect of watershed land use and lake age on zooplankton species richness Hydrobiologia 2007579 (1) 393-399.

  • [34]. Vadeboncoeur Y.; McIntyre P.; van der Zanden M. J. Borders of Biodiversity: Life at the Edge of the World’s Large Lakes BioScience 201161 (7) 526-537.

  • [35]. Mailand W. Comparison of Gastropod Assemblages from Natural and Phosphate Mine Lakes of Central Florida University of South Florida Masters of Biology 2015 pp. 45.

  • [36]. Patterson R.; Kumar A. Assessment of arcellacean (thecamoebian) assemblages species and strains as contaminant indicators in James Lake Northeastern Ontario Canada J Foramin Res. 200030 310-320.

  • [37]. Roe H.; Patterson R. Distribution of thecamoebians (testate amoebae) in small lakes and ponds Barbados West Indies J Foram Res. 200636116-134.

  • [38]. Patterson R.; Roe H.; Swindles G. Development of an Arcellacean (testate lobose amoebae) based transfer function for sedimentary phosphorous in lakes Palaeogeogr Palaeocl. 2012348-349 32-44.

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 338 330 9
PDF Downloads 269 266 7