Introduction: Tooth impaction is defined as the absence of a tooth on the arch, after its normal eruption age. The main reason canines are impacted is the lack of space required for the tooth to erupt.
Aim of study: The main objective of this study is to determine the types of malocclusions associated with canine impaction (Lindauer classification). A secondary objective is to establish the correlation between these parameters and identification of subjects with high risk of canine impaction based on pre-existing malocclusion.
Material and methods: This study was performed on a sample of 20 patients, 9 men and 11 women. The dental casts were subject to Angle classification and various measurements such as arch perimeter, Pont’s index, sum of the mesiodistal width of the incisor and arch length were performed. The Lindauer sectorial classification was determined based on the patients’ panoramic radiography.
Results: According to the data collected, the Class II /2 malocclusion is more frequent, and it is associated with the impacted canine (approximately 50%). According to the Lindauer classification higher frequency of the impacted canines was found in Sector IV.
Conclusion: The diagnosis for impacted canines is often associated with Class II /2 malocclusion, and according to the Sector classification, it is often localised in Sector IV.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
1. Maverna R, Gracco A. Different diagnostic tools for the localization of impacted maxillary canines: clinical considerations. Prog Orthod. 2007;8(1):28-44
2. Om Prakash Kharbanda: Diagnosis and Management of Malocclusion and Dentofacial Deformities. All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Elsevier: 2009, pp. 415 - 436
3. Goje SK: Impacted maxillary canine orthodontic traction and incisor root resorption. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019;155(5):615-616
4. Reyes E, James M, Leah W: Three-dimensional localization of maxillary canines with cone-beam computed tomography. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2005;128:418–423
5. Malik DES, Fida M, Sukhia RH. Correlation between radiographic parameters for the prediction of palatally impacted maxillary canines. J Orthod. 2019;46(1):6-13
6. Becker A, Chaushu S. Etiology of maxillary canine impaction: a review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015;148(4):557-67
7. Grybienė V, Juozėnaitė D, Kubiliūtė K. Diagnostic methods and treatment strategies of impacted maxillary canines: A literature review. Stomatologija. 2019;21(1):3-12
8. McConnell TL, D L Hoffman, D P Forbes, E K Janzen, N H Weintraub. Maxillary canine impaction in patients with transverse maxillary deficiency. ASDC J Dent Child. 1996; 63(3):190-5.
9. Power SM, Short MB. An investigation into the response of palatally displaced canines to the removal of deciduous canines and an assessment of factors contributing to favourable. Br J Orthod. 1993;20(3):215-23
10. Eslami E, Barkhordar H, Abramovitch K, Kim J, Masoud MI. Cone-beam computed tomography vs conventional radiography in visualization of maxillary impacted-canine localization: A systematic review of comparative studies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017;151(2):248-258
11. Tadinada A, Mahdian M, Vishwanath M, Allareddy V, Upadhyay M, Yadav S. Evaluation of alveolar bone dimensions in unilateral palatally impacted canine: a cone-beam computed tomographic analyses. Eur J Orthod. 2015;37(6):596-602
12. Chaushu S, Chaushu G, Becker A. The use of panoramic radiographs to localize displaced maxillary canines. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1999;88(4):511-6
13. Archna N, Pai K, Suhas S, Gaurav S. Localization of impacted maxillary canines using panoramic radiography. Jurnal of Oral Science. 2009;51(1):37-45
14. Lindauer SJ, Rubenstein LK, Hang WM, Andersen WC, Isaacson RJ. Canine impaction identified early with panoramic radiographs. Am Dent Assoc. 1992;123:91–97