Dental abfraction is a pathological process which causes a loss of dental hard substance. Etiopathogenesis is related to occlusal stress that causes microfractures in enamel and dentin in the cervical region. The restoration treatment is made using aesthetic adhesive materials, but must take into account the causal factors and the specific area where the restoration is done.
1. Abrahamsen TC. (2005). The worn dentition– pathognomonic patterns of abrasion and erosion. Int Dent J. 55, 268–76.
2. Chan D. C., Browning W.D., Pohjola R., Hackman S.& Myers M.L. (2006). Predictors of non-carious loss of cervical tooth tissues. Op Dent.31(1), 84–88.
3. Bartlett D.W. & Shah P. (2006). A critical review of non-carious cervical (wear) lesions and the role of abfraction, erosion, and abrasion. J Dent Res. 85(4), 306–12.
4. Fruits T.J., VanBrunt C.L., Khajotia S.S. & Duncanson M.G. Jr.(2002). Effect of cyclical lateral forces on microleakage in cervical resin composite restorations. Quint Int. 33, 205–12.
5. Grippo J.O., Simring M. & Schreiner S. (2004) Attrition, abrasion, corrosion and abfraction revisited: A new perspective on tooth surface lesions. J Am Dent Assoc. 135, 1109–18.
6. Takehara J., Takano T., Akhter R. & Morita M. (2008). Correlations of noncarious cervical lesions and occlusal factors determined by using pressure-detecting sheet. J Dent. 36(10), 774–79. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.05.009
7. Tsiggos N., Tortopidis D., Hatzikyriakos A. & Menexes G. (2008). Association between self-reported bruxism activity and occurrence of dental attrition, abfraction, and occlusal pits on natural teeth. J Prosteth Dent. 100(1), 41–46. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60135-3.
8. Michael J.A., Townsend G.C., Greenwood L.F. & Kaidonis J.A. (2009) Abfraction: Separating fact from fiction. Aust Dent J. 54, 2–8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2008.01080.x.
9. Rees J.S. (2000). A Review of biomechanics of abfraction. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 8,139–44.
10. Palamara J.E.A., Palamara D., Messer H. & Tyas M.J. (2006). Tooth morphology and characteristics of non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent. 34(3),185–94.
11. Litonjua L.A., Andreana S., Bush P.J., Tobias T.S. & Cohen R.E. (2003). Noncarious cervical lesions and abfractions: A re-evalution. J Am Dent Assoc. 134, 845–50.
12. Peaumans M, De Munck J., Landuyt V., Kanumilli P., Yoshida Y. & Inoue S. (2007) Restoring cervical lesions with flexible composites. Dent Mater.23, 749–54.
13. Pereira A.F., Poiate I.A., Poiate E. Jr & Miranda W.G. Jr. (2008). Abfraction lesions reviewed: Current concepts. RGO (Porto Alegre). 56, 321– 26.
14. Wood I., Jawad Z., Paisley C. & Brunton P. (2008). Non-carious cervical tooth surface loss: a literature review. J Dent. 36(10), 759–66. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.06.004
15. Perez C.R. (2010). Alternative technique for class v resin composite restorations with minimum finishing/ polishing procedures. Op Dent. 35(3), 375–79. DOI: 10.2341/09-310-TR.
16. Li Q., Jepsen S., Albers H.K. & Eberhard J. (2006). Flowable materials as an intermediate layer could improve the marginal and internal adaptation of composite restorations in Class-V-cavities. Dent Mater. 22, 250–57. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.06.004