Rosborough Formulation in Satellite Gravity Gradiometry

Open access

ABSTRACT

Following the launch of CHAMP, a new era was born in the gravity field determination from satellite observations. Many methods have been proposed and applied for the recovery of the Earth’s gravity field from the observations of the satellite missions CHAMP, GRACE and GOCE. This paper deals with the Rosborough formulation in gravity field modelling. This formulation is derived from the transformation of time-wise representation from the orbital into the spherical coordinate systems. Base functions of the Rosborough formulation depend on the type of the functional of the gravity field and the inclination of the orbit. Unlike the space-wise approach, the Rosborough approach can easily deal with both isotropic and non-isotropic functionals. The proposed formulation is implemented on the GOCE data in order to show its efficiency. Numerical results show that the Rosborough formulation is a powerful and efficient tool in the case of GOCE gradiometry data processing.

European Space Agency, (1999) Gravity field and steady-state Ocean Circulation mission. Reports for the Mission selection. The four candidate Earth explorer core missions. ESA SP-1233(1), European Space Agency.

Kaula, W.M., (1966) Theory of satellite geodesy. Blaisdell Publishing Company.

Klees, R., Koop, R., Visser, P., Van den Ijssel, J., (2000) Efficient gravity field recovery from GOCE gravity gradient observations. Journal of geodesy 74, 561-571.

Lemoine, F.G., Kenyon, S.C., Factor, J.K., Trimmer, R.G., Pavlis, N.K., Chinn, D.S., Cox, C.M., Klosko, S.M., Luthcke, S.B., Torrence, M.H., others, (1998) The Development of the Joint NASA GSFC and the National Imagery and Mapping Agency(NIMA) Geopotential Model EGM 96. NASA.

Pail, R., Goiginger, H., Mayrhofer, R., Schuh, W.D., Brockmann, J.M., Krasbutter, I., Höck, E., Fecher, T., (2010) GOCE gravity field model derived from orbit and gradiometry data applying the time-wise method, in: Proceedings of the ESA Living Planet Symposium, ESA Publication SP-686, ESA/ESTEC, ISBN (Online). p. 978-92.

Pail, R., Bruinsma, S., Migliaccio, F., Förste, C., Goiginger, H., Schuh, W.D., Höck, E., Reguzzoni, M., Brockmann, J.M., Abrikosov, O., others,(2011) First GOCE gravity field models derived by three different approaches. Journal of Geodesy 85, 819-843.

Petrovskaya, M., Vershkov, A., (2006) Non-singular expressions for the gravity gradients in the local north-oriented and orbital reference frames. Journal of Geodesy 80, 117-127.

Reguzzoni, M., Tselfes, N., (2009) Optimal multi-step collocation: application to the spacewise approach for GOCE data analysis. Journal of Geodesy 83, 13-29.

Reigber, C., Schwintzer, P., Lühr, H., (1999) The CHAMP geopotential mission. Boll Geof Teor Appl 40: 285-289.

Rosborough, G.W., (1986) Satellite Orbit Perturbations due to Geopotential, CSR-86-1 Rummel, R., Van Gelderen M, Koop R, Schrama E, Sanso F, Brovelli M, Miggliaccio F, Sacerdote F, (1993) Spherical harmonic analysis of satellite gradiometry. Publ Geodesy 39, Netherlands Geodetic Commission , Delft.

Rummel, R., Balmino, G., Johannessen, J., Visser, P., Woodworth, P., (2002) Dedicated gravity field missions-principles and aims. Journal of Geodynamics 33, 3-20.

Rummel, R., Yi, W., Stummer, C., (2011) GOCE gravitational gradiometry. Journal of Geodesy 85: 777-790.

Sharifi, M.A., (2006) Satellite to satellite tracking in the space-wise approach. Ph.D. Thesis, university of Stuttgart, Germany.

Sneeuw, N.J., (2000) A semi-analytical approach to gravity field analysis from satellite observations. Ph.D. Thesis, Technical university of Munchen, Germany.

Sneeuw, N., (2003) Space-wise, time-wise, torus and Rosborough representations in gravity field modelling. Space science reviews 108, 37-46.

Tapley, B.D., Bettadpur, S., Watkins, M., Reigber, C., (2004) The gravity recovery and climate experiment: Mission overview and early results. Geophys. Res. Lett 31, L09607.

Xu, C., Sideris, M., Sneeuw, N., (2008) The Torus Approach in Spaceborne Gravimetry, in: VI Hotine-Marussi Symposium on Theoretical and Computational Geodesy. pp. 23-28.

Artificial Satellites

The Journal of Space Research Centre of Polish Academy of Sciences

Journal Information


CiteScore 2017: 0.71

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.302
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.703

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 109 109 16
PDF Downloads 16 16 1