Thermoregulatory and Behaviour Responses of Dairy Heifers Raised on a Silvopastoral System in a Subtropical Climate

Frederico Márcio C. Vieira 1 , Matheus Deniz 1 , Edgar S. Vismara 2 , Piotr Herbut 3 , Jaqueline A. Pilatti 1 , Maurício Zotti Sponchiado 1 ,  and Barbara de Oliveira Puretz 1
  • 1 Grupo de Estudos em Biometeorologia – GEBIOMET (Biometeorology Study Group), Federal University of Technology – Paraná (UTFPR), Brazil
  • 2 Federal University of Technology – Paraná (UTFPR), , Brazil
  • 3 University of Agriculture in Krakow, Department of Rural Building, Kraków, Poland


In this study, we investigated the influence of a silvopastoral system on the thermal environment, behaviour and thermoregulation of dairy heifers in a subtropical climate. The experiment was conducted on a dairy farm in Southwest Paraná, Brazil, during the summer of 2014. Crossbred Holstein × Jersey dairy heifers (n = 10) were used in a split-plot design. The fixed effects in this study include time of day (9:00–10:00, 13:00–14:00, and 17:00–18:00 h) under silvopastoral or open pastures conditions, which were the main-plot and split-plot factors, respectively. To assess the environmental conditions in both systems, air temperature, relative humidity and wind speed were recorded. In addition, the temperature-humidity index was calculated based on the microcli-mate measurements. Respiratory rate and hair coat surface temperature of heifers were measured in both groups during time of day (30 days). Diurnal behaviour using focal observations with 0/1 sampling was observed. Data were analysed using Bayesian inference with a mixed effects model. The air temperature was higher (P<0.05) in open pasture conditions than the silvopasture system. Temperature-humidity index values for the silvopasture system were lower than open pasture during the hottest hours of the day. Regarding thermoregulation responses, there was an interaction between time of day and pasture environment (P<0.05). Heifers showed lower respiratory rates and hair coat surface temperature values (P<0.05) when access to shade was provided, mainly during the hottest periods in the afternoon. In addition, there was also an interaction between rumination and water intake (P<0.05), which indicates a higher rumination frequency for animals in the silvopasture system during the hottest period, as well as a higher water intake frequency for heifers in open pasture during midday. These findings imply that the arrangement of trees in a silvopasture system provides better thermal comfort conditions for dairy heifers raised in a subtropical climate.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Ainsworth J.A.W., Moe S.R., Skarpe C. (2012). Pasture shade and farm management effects on cow productivity in the tropics. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 155: 105–110.

  • Alvares C.A., Stape J.L., Sentelhas P.C., Gonçalves J.L.M., Sparovek G. (2013). Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorol. Z., 22: 711–728.

  • Angrecka S., Herbut P. (2016). Impact of barn orientation on insolation and temperature of stalls surface. Ann. Anim. Sci., 16: 887–896.

  • Armstrong D.V. (1994). Symposium – Nutrition and heat-stress interaction with shade and cooling. J. Dairy Sci., 77: 2044–2050.

  • Baliscei M.A., Barbosa O.R., Souza W., Costa M.A., Krutzmann A., Queiroz E.O. (2013). Microclimate without shade and silvopastoral system during summer and winter. Acta Scient. Anim. Sci., 35: 49–56.

  • Baumgard L.H., Rhoads Jr.R.P. (2013). Effects of heat stress on postabsorptive metabolism and energetics. Ann. Rev. Anim. Biosci., 1: 311–337.

  • Berman A., Folman Y., Kaim M., Mamen M., Herz Z., Wolfenson D., Arieli A., Graber Y. (1985). Upper critical temperatures and forced ventilation effects for high-yielding dairy-cows in a sub-tropical climate. J. Dairy Sci., 68: 1488–1495.

  • Broom D.M., Fraser A.F. (2007). Domestic Animal Behaviour and Welfare, 4th edition. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.

  • Bürkner P. (2017). brms: An R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan. Journal of Statistical Software, 80: 1–28.

  • Cardot V., Le Roux Y., Jurjanz S. (2008). Drinking behavior of lactating dairy cows and prediction of their water intake. J. Dairy Sci., 91: 2257–2264.

  • Collier R.J., Dahl G.E., Vanbaale M.J. (2006). Major advances associated with environmental effects on dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci., 89: 1244–1253.

  • Domingos H.G.T., Maia A.S.C., Souza Jr.J.B.F., Silva R.B., Vieira F.M.C., Silva R.G. (2013). Effect of shade and water sprinkling on physiological responses and milk yields of Holstein cows in a semi-arid region. Livest. Sci., 154: 169–174.

  • Feldhake C.M. (2009). Forage evapotranspiration and photosynthetically active radiation interception in proximity to deciduous trees. Agric. Water Manag., 96: 1170–1174.

  • Fuquay J.W. (1981). Heat stress as is affects animal production. J. Anim. Sci., 52: 164–174.

  • Hahn G.L. (1999). Dynamic responses of cattle to thermal heat loads. J. Anim. Sci., 77: 10–20.

  • Herbut P., Angrecka S. (2018). Relationship between THI level and dairy cows’ behaviour during summer period. Ital. J. Anim. Sci., 17: 226–233.

  • Kadzere C.T., Murphy M.R., Silanikove N., Maltz E. (2002). Heat stress in lactating dairy cows: a review. Livest. Prod. Sci., 77: 59–91.

  • Karki U., Goodman M.S. (2010). Cattle distribution and behavior in southern-pine silvopasture versus open-pasture. Agroforestry Systems, 78: 159–168.

  • Karki U., Goodman M.S. (2015). Microclimatic differences between mature loblolly-pine silvo-pasture and open-pasture. Agroforestry Systems, 89: 319–325.

  • Karvatte Jr.N., Klosowski E.S., Almeida R.G., Mesquita E.E., Oliveira C.C., Alves F.V. (2016). Shading effect on microclimate and thermal comfort indexes in integrated crop-livestock-forest systems in the Brazilian Midwest. Internat. J. Biometeorol., 60: 1933–1941.

  • Lopes L.B., Eckstein C., Pina D.S., Carnevalli R.A. (2016). The influence of trees on the thermal environment and behaviour of grazing heifers in Brazilian Midwest. Trop. Anim. Health Pro., 48: 755–761.

  • Marcillac-Embertson N.M., Robinson P.H., Fadel J.G., Mitloehner F.M. (2009). Effects of shade and sprinklers on performance, behavior, physiology, and the environment of heifers. J. Dairy Sci., 92: 506–517.

  • Martello L.S., Savastano Jr.H., Silva S.L., Balieiro J.C.C. (2010). Alternative body sites for heat stress measurement in milking cows under tropical conditions and their relationship to the thermal discomfort of the animals. Internat. J. Biometeorol., 54: 647–652.

  • Mc Neish D. (2016). On using Bayesian methods to address small sample problems. Structural Equation Modelling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23: 750-773.

  • Mello A.C.T., Carnevalli R.A., Shiratsuchi L.S., Carneiroe Pedreira B., Lo-pes L.B., Xavier D.B. (2017). Improved grazing activity of dairy heifers in shaded tropical grasslands. Ciência Rural, 47: 1–7.

  • Peri P.L., Dube F., Varella A.C. (2016). Silvopastoral systems in the subtropical and temperate zones of South America: An overview. In: Silvopastoral systems in Southern South America, Peri P.L., Dube F., Varella A.C. (eds). Gainesville, USA, Springer, pp. 1–8.

  • Pezzopane J.R.M., Nicodemo M.L.F., Bosi C., Garcia A.R., Lulu J. (2019). Animal thermal comfort indexes in silvopastoral systems with different tree arrangements. J. Therm. Biol., 79: 103–111.

  • Porfírio-da-Silva V., Vieira A.R.R., Caramori P.H., Baggio A.J. (2004). A radiação solar global em pastagem arborizada com renques de Grevillea robusta A. Cunn. ex. R. Br. (in Portuguese). Agrossilvicultura, 1: 187–193.

  • Silanikove N. (2000). Effects of heat stress on the welfare of extensively managed domestic ruminants. Livest. Prod. Sci., 67: 1–18.

  • Silva R.G., Maia A.S.C. (2013). Principles of Animal Biometeorology, Heidelberg, Germany, Springer.

  • Souza E.C., Salman A.K.D., Cruz P.G., Veit H.M., Carvalho G.A., Silva F.R.F., Schmitt E. (2019). Thermal comfort and grazing behavior of Girolando heifers in integrated crop-livestock (ICL) and crop-livestock-forest (ICLF) systems. 41: e46483.

  • Tapki I., Sahin A. (2006). Comparison of the thermoregulatory behaviours of low and high producing dairy cows in a hot environment. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 99: 1–11.

  • Varella A.C., Barro R.S., Silva J.L.S., Porfírio-da-Silva V., Saibro J.C. (2016). Silvopastoral systems in the cold zone of Brazil. In: Silvopastoral systems in Southern South America, Peri P.L., Dube F., Varella A.C. (eds). Gainesville, USA, Springer, pp. 231–255.


Journal + Issues