Effect of Two Cooling Frequencies on Respiration Rate in Lactating Dairy Cows Under Hot and Humid Climate Conditions

Severino Pinto 1 , 2 , Gundula Hoffmann 1 , Christian Ammon 1 , Wolfgang Heuwieser 3 , Harel Levit 4 , Ilan Halachmi 4 ,  and Thomas Amon 1 , 2
  • 1 Department of Engineering for Livestock Management, Leibniz Institute for Agricultural Engineering and Bioeconomy – ATB, 14469, Potsdam, Germany
  • 2 Institute of Animal Hygiene and Environmental Health, Free University Berlin, 14163, Berlin, Germany
  • 3 Clinic for Animal Reproduction, Free University Berlin, 14163, Berlin, Germany
  • 4 Precision Livestock Farming Laboratory, Agricultural Research Organization – The Volcani Center – ARO, 7505101, Rishon LeZion, Israel


The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of evaporative cooling at two different frequencies per day on the respiration rate (RR) of lactating dairy cows, considering cow-related factors. Twenty multiparous Israeli Holstein dairy cows housed in a naturally ventilated cowshed were divided randomly into two treatment groups. The cows of both groups were exposed to 3 or 8 cooling sessions per day (3xcool vs. 8xcool, respectively). The RR was observed hourly, with a maximum of 12 measurements per day. Body posture (standing vs. lying) was simultaneously documented. Milk yield was recorded daily. Coat color was determined from a digital photograph. The RR of standing and lying cows was lower in the 8xcool group (60.2 and 51.6 breaths per min (bpm), respectively) than in the 3xcool group (73.1 and 65.6 bpm, respectively). For each increment of five kilograms of milk produced, RR increased by one bpm, and the RR of cows in early days in milk (DIM) was 12.3 bpm higher than that of cows in late DIM. In conclusion, eight cooling sessions per day instead of three lead to a RR abatement in heat-stressed cows under hot conditions, and cow-related factors directly impact the RR during heat stress assessment.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Acatincăi S., Gavojdian D., Stanciu G., Cziszter L.T., Tripon I., Baul S. (2010). Study regarding rumination behavior in cattle – position adopted by cows during rumination process. Sci. Pap. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol., 43: 199–202.

  • Angrecka S., Herbut P. (2017). Eligibility of lying boxes at different THI levels in a freestall barn. Ann. Anim. Sci., 17: 257–269.

  • Avendano-Reyes L., Alvarez-Valenzuela F.D., Correa-Calderon A., Algandar-Sandoval A., Rodriguez-Gonzalez E., Perez-Velazquez R., Macias-Cruz U., Diaz-Molina R., Robinson P.H., Fadel J.G. (2010). Comparison of three cooling management systems to reduce heat stress in lactating Holstein cows during hot and dry ambient conditions. Livest. Sci., 132: 48–52.

  • Berman A. (2005). Estimates of heat stress relief needs for Holstein dairy cows. J. Anim. Sci., 83: 1377–1384.

  • Berman A. (2006). Extending the potential of evaporative cooling for heat-stress relief. J. Dairy Sci., 89: 3817–3825.

  • Berman A., Folman Y., Kaim M., Mamen M., Herz Z., Wolfenson D., Arieli A., Graber Y. (1985). Upper critical-temperatures and forced ventilation effects for high-yielding dairy cows in a sub-tropical climate. J. Dairy Sci., 68: 1488–1495.

  • Bernabucci U., Lacetera N., Baumgard L.H., Rhoads R.P., Ronchi B., Nardone A. (2010). Metabolic and hormonal acclimation to heat stress in domesticated ruminants. Animal, 4: 1167–1183.

  • Brown-Brandl T.M., Eigenberg R.A., Nienaber J.A., Hahn G.L. (2005). Dynamic response indicators of heat stress in shaded and non-shaded feedlot cattle, Part 1: Analyses of indicators. Biosyst. Eng., 90: 451–462.

  • Burgos R., Odens L.J., Collier R.J., Baumgard L.H., Van Baale M.J. (2007). Case study: evaluation of different cooling systems in lactating heat-stressed dairy cows in a semi-arid environment. The Professional Animal Scientist, 23: 546–555.

  • Chen J.M., Schutz K.E., Tucker C.B. (2015). Cooling cows efficiently with sprinklers: physiological responses to water spray. J. Dairy Sci., 98: 6925–6938.

  • Chen J.M., Schutz K.E., Tucker C.B. (2016). Cooling cows efficiently with water spray: behavioral, physiological, and production responses to sprinklers at the feed bunk. J. Dairy Sci., 99: 4607–4618.

  • Flamenbaum I., Wolfenson D., Mamen M., Berman A. (1986). Cooling dairy cattle by a combination of sprinkling and forced ventilation and its implementation in the shelter system. J. Dairy Sci., 69: 3140–3147.

  • Fournel S., Ouellet V., Charbonneau E. (2017). Practices for alleviating heat stress of dairy cows in humid continental climates: a literature review. Animal, 7: 37; doi:10.3390/ani7050037.

  • Frazzi E., Calamari L., Calegari F., Stefanini L. (2000). Behavior of dairy cows in response to different barn cooling systems. ASAE, 43: 387–394.

  • Galán E., Llonch P., Villagrá A., Levit H., Pinto S., del Prado A. (2018). A systematic review of non-productivity-related animal-based indicators of heat stress resilience in dairy cattle. Plos One, 13: e0206520.

  • Garner J.B., Douglas M., Williams S.R.O., Wales W.J., Marett L.C., Di Giacomo K., Leury B.J., Hayes B.J. (2017). Responses of dairy cows to short-term heat stress in controlled-climate chambers. Anim. Prod. Sci., 57: 1233–1241.

  • Gaughan J.B., Holt S.M., Hahn G.L., Mader T.L., Eigenberg R. (2000). Respiration rate – is it a good measure of heat stress in cattle? Asian-Australas. J. Anim., 13: 329–332.

  • Gaughan J.B., Mader T.L., Holt S.M. (2008). Cooling and feeding strategies to reduce heat load of grain-fed beef cattle in intensive housing. Livest. Sci., 113: 226–233.

  • Hahn G.L. (1999). Dynamic responses of cattle to thermal heat loads. J. Anim. Sci., 77, Suppl 2: 10–20.

  • Her E., Wolfenson D., Flamenbaum I., Folman Y., Kaim M., Berman A. (1988). Thermal, productive, and reproductive responses of high yielding cows exposed to short-term cooling in summer. J. Dairy Sci., 71: 1085–1092.

  • Herbut P., Angrecka S. (2018). The effect of heat stress on time spent lying by cows in a housing system. Ann. Anim. Sci., 18: 825–833.

  • Honig H., Miron J., Lehrer H., Jackoby S., Zachut M., Zinou A., Portnick Y., Moallem U. (2012). Performance and welfare of high-yielding dairy cows subjected to 5 or 8 cooling sessions daily under hot and humid climate. J. Dairy Sci., 95: 3736–3742.

  • Kabuga J.D. (1992). The influence of thermal conditions on rectal temperature, respiration rate and pulse-rate of lactating Holstein-Friesian cows in the humid tropics. Int. J. Biometeorol., 36: 146–150.

  • Kadzere C.T., Murphy M.R., Silanikove N., Maltz E. (2002). Heat stress in lactating dairy cows: a review. Livest. Prod. Sci., 77: 59–91.

  • Kendall P.E., Verkerk G.A., Webster J.R., Tucker C.B. (2007). Sprinklers and shade cool cows and reduce insect-avoidance behavior in pasture-based dairy systems. J. Dairy Sci., 90: 3671–3680.

  • Legates J.E., Farthing B.R., Casady R.B., Barrada M.S. (1991). Body temperature and respiratory rate of lactating dairy cattle under field and chamber conditions. J. Dairy Sci., 74: 2491–2500.

  • Maia A.S.C., da Silva R.G., Bertipaglia E.C.A. (2005). Environmental and genetic variation of the effective radiative properties of the coat of Holstein cows under tropical conditions. Livest. Prod. Sci., 92: 307–315.

  • Moallem U., Altmark G., Lehrer H., Arieli A. (2010). Performance of high-yielding dairy cows supplemented with fat or concentrate under hot and humid climates. J. Dairy Sci., 93: 3192–3202.

  • Ortiz X.A., Smith J.F., Villar F., Hall L., Allen J., Oddy A., al-Haddad A., Lyle P., Collier R.J. (2015). A comparison of 2 evaporative cooling systems on a commercial dairy farm in Saudi Arabia. J. Dairy Sci., 98: 8710–8722.

  • Pinto S., Hoffmann G., Ammon C., Amon B., Heuwieser W., Halachmi I., Banhazi T., Amon T. (2019). Influence of barn climate, body postures and milk yield on the respiration rate of dairy cows. Ann. Anim. Sci., 19: 469–481; doi:10.2478/aoas-2018-0053.

  • Polsky L., von Keyserlingk M.A.G. (2017). Invited review: Effects of heat stress on dairy cattle welfare. J. Dairy Sci., 100: 8645–8657.

  • Ravagnolo O., Misztal I., Hoogenboom G. (2000). Genetic component of heat stress in dairy cattle, development of heat index function. J. Dairy Sci., 83: 2120–2125.

  • Sharma A.K., Rodriguez L.A., Mekonnen G., Wilcox C.J., Bachman K.C., Collier R.J. (1983). Climatological and genetic effects on milk composition and yield. J. Dairy Sci., 66: 119–126.

  • Tresoldi G., Schutz K.E., Tucker C.B. (2018). Cooling cows with sprinklers: Spray duration affects physiological responses to heat load. J. Dairy Sci., 101: 4412–4423.

  • Tucker C.B., Rogers A.R., Schutz K.E. (2008). Effect of solar radiation on dairy cattle behaviour, use of shade and body temperature in a pasture-based system. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 109: 141–154.

  • Valtorta S.E., Gallardo M.R. (2004). Evaporative cooling for Holstein dairy cows under grazing conditions. Int. J. Biometeorol., 48: 213–217.

  • Wang X.S., Zhang G.Q., Choi C.Y. (2018). Effect of airflow speed and direction on convective heat transfer of standing and reclining cows. Biosyst. Eng., 167: 87–98.

  • West J.W. (2003). Effects of heat-stress on production in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci., 86: 2131–2144.


Journal + Issues